Loading…
Wastewater treatment by membrane ultrafiltration enhanced with ultrasound: Effect of membrane flux and ultrasonic frequency
•Ultrasonic enhanced membrane ultrafiltration at two fluxes and two US frequencies.•Enhancement of the treatment performance at the lowest US frequency of 35kHz.•US are more effective in fouling rate reduction at higher membrane flux (150L/m2h).•Higher OM and turbidity removals were obtained at 130k...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasonics 2018-02, Vol.83, p.42-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Ultrasonic enhanced membrane ultrafiltration at two fluxes and two US frequencies.•Enhancement of the treatment performance at the lowest US frequency of 35kHz.•US are more effective in fouling rate reduction at higher membrane flux (150L/m2h).•Higher OM and turbidity removals were obtained at 130kHz.
Membrane ultrafiltration is increasingly applied for wastewater treatment and reuse, even though membrane fouling still represents one of the main drawbacks of this technology. In the last years, innovative strategies for membrane fouling control have been developed, such as the combination of membrane processes with ultrasound (US). In present work, the application of membrane ultrafiltration and its combination with US were studied, evaluating the influence on the performance of the treatment and membrane fouling formation of two membrane fluxes, 75 and 150L/m2h, along with two US frequencies, 35 and 150kHz. The results observed showed that the combination of membrane ultrafiltration with US, respect to the filtration process alone, reduced membrane fouling rates to a greater extent at the higher membrane flux and lower US frequency applied, reaching a reduction of 57.33% at 150L/m2h and 35kHz. Furthermore, higher organic matter and turbidity removals were observed at higher frequency (130kHz). The results obtained highlights the applicability of this combined process for the upgrading of membrane ultrafiltration and as an alternative option to conventional tertiary wastewater treatments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-624X 1874-9968 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.06.013 |