Loading…
Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure
The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lasers in medical science 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823 |
container_end_page | 1533 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1525 |
container_title | Lasers in medical science |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Stevic, Marija Ristic, Nina Budic, Ivana Ladjevic, Nebojsa Trifunovic, Branislav Rakic, Ivan Majstorovic, Marko Burazor, Ivana Simic, Dusica |
description | The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO
2
(wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s
t
test, Mann-Whitney
U
test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1918845510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918845510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoO4uOPoD_AiAS9e2q18daePMqwfsODFBW8hk1TGrN3JmEzD-u83zawigqeiqKfeSt6XkFcM3jGA4aoyYCA6YEPH-aC6-ydkw6RQXQ_y21OyAd7rTo-cXZLntd5BA3smnpFLrgfgWrINibs8H22JNSeaA_2BJzvHhNQmvzY55ImGXKhHPNKK3p5iI9epTXY6YI2WxkTd9zj5gokuyWM55JgOdLIVCz2W7NAvBV-Qi2Cnii8f65bcfrj-uvvU3Xz5-Hn3_qZzYuCnDt0IXPqg2vvEXgYBCve96L1TgYG0fa-1hdFZ5ocBbB9wDMpKKQahnNNcbMnbs267_HPBejJzrA6nySbMSzVsZFpLpZpzW_LmH_QuL6X9a6UEFyA0rILsTLmSay0YzLHE2ZZfhoFZczDnHEyz16w5mPu28_pRednP6P9s_Da-AfwM1DZKByx_nf6v6gPkK5Ou</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932303802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO
2
(wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s
t
test, Mann-Whitney
U
test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28702841</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesia - adverse effects ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; Apnea ; Carbon dioxide ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clinical outcomes ; Deep Sedation - adverse effects ; Dentistry ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Ketamine ; Ketamine - therapeutic use ; Laser Therapy - adverse effects ; Lasers ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Midazolam ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Oximetry ; Pain perception ; Parents ; Patient safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Photonics ; Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Pulse duration ; Quantum Optics ; ROC Curve ; Stability analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tachycardia ; Wavelength</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Lasers in Medical Science is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28702841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristic, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trifunovic, Branislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majstorovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burazor, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO
2
(wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s
t
test, Mann-Whitney
U
test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous</subject><subject>Apnea</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Deep Sedation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Ketamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulse duration</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoO4uOPoD_AiAS9e2q18daePMqwfsODFBW8hk1TGrN3JmEzD-u83zawigqeiqKfeSt6XkFcM3jGA4aoyYCA6YEPH-aC6-ydkw6RQXQ_y21OyAd7rTo-cXZLntd5BA3smnpFLrgfgWrINibs8H22JNSeaA_2BJzvHhNQmvzY55ImGXKhHPNKK3p5iI9epTXY6YI2WxkTd9zj5gokuyWM55JgOdLIVCz2W7NAvBV-Qi2Cnii8f65bcfrj-uvvU3Xz5-Hn3_qZzYuCnDt0IXPqg2vvEXgYBCve96L1TgYG0fa-1hdFZ5ocBbB9wDMpKKQahnNNcbMnbs267_HPBejJzrA6nySbMSzVsZFpLpZpzW_LmH_QuL6X9a6UEFyA0rILsTLmSay0YzLHE2ZZfhoFZczDnHEyz16w5mPu28_pRednP6P9s_Da-AfwM1DZKByx_nf6v6gPkK5Ou</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Stevic, Marija</creator><creator>Ristic, Nina</creator><creator>Budic, Ivana</creator><creator>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creator><creator>Trifunovic, Branislav</creator><creator>Rakic, Ivan</creator><creator>Majstorovic, Marko</creator><creator>Burazor, Ivana</creator><creator>Simic, Dusica</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><author>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous</topic><topic>Apnea</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Deep Sedation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Ketamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulse duration</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristic, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trifunovic, Branislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majstorovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burazor, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevic, Marija</au><au>Ristic, Nina</au><au>Budic, Ivana</au><au>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</au><au>Trifunovic, Branislav</au><au>Rakic, Ivan</au><au>Majstorovic, Marko</au><au>Burazor, Ivana</au><au>Simic, Dusica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1525</spage><epage>1533</epage><pages>1525-1533</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO
2
(wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s
t
test, Mann-Whitney
U
test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>28702841</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-8921 |
ispartof | Lasers in medical science, 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533 |
issn | 0268-8921 1435-604X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1918845510 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Analgesia Analgesia - adverse effects Anesthesia Anesthetics, Intravenous Apnea Carbon dioxide Child Child, Preschool Children Clinical outcomes Deep Sedation - adverse effects Dentistry Female Fentanyl Humans Hypertension Ketamine Ketamine - therapeutic use Laser Therapy - adverse effects Lasers Male Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Midazolam Optical Devices Optics Original Article Oximetry Pain perception Parents Patient safety Patient Satisfaction Patients Pediatrics Photonics Physicians Prospective Studies Pulse duration Quantum Optics ROC Curve Stability analysis Statistical analysis Statistical tests Surveys and Questionnaires Tachycardia Wavelength |
title | Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ketamine%20and%20ketofol%20for%20deep%20sedation%20and%20analgesia%20in%20children%20undergoing%20laser%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Stevic,%20Marija&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1525&rft.epage=1533&rft.pages=1525-1533&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918845510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932303802&rft_id=info:pmid/28702841&rfr_iscdi=true |