Loading…

Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure

The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in medical science 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533
Main Authors: Stevic, Marija, Ristic, Nina, Budic, Ivana, Ladjevic, Nebojsa, Trifunovic, Branislav, Rakic, Ivan, Majstorovic, Marko, Burazor, Ivana, Simic, Dusica
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823
container_end_page 1533
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1525
container_title Lasers in medical science
container_volume 32
creator Stevic, Marija
Ristic, Nina
Budic, Ivana
Ladjevic, Nebojsa
Trifunovic, Branislav
Rakic, Ivan
Majstorovic, Marko
Burazor, Ivana
Simic, Dusica
description The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1918845510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918845510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoO4uOPoD_AiAS9e2q18daePMqwfsODFBW8hk1TGrN3JmEzD-u83zawigqeiqKfeSt6XkFcM3jGA4aoyYCA6YEPH-aC6-ydkw6RQXQ_y21OyAd7rTo-cXZLntd5BA3smnpFLrgfgWrINibs8H22JNSeaA_2BJzvHhNQmvzY55ImGXKhHPNKK3p5iI9epTXY6YI2WxkTd9zj5gokuyWM55JgOdLIVCz2W7NAvBV-Qi2Cnii8f65bcfrj-uvvU3Xz5-Hn3_qZzYuCnDt0IXPqg2vvEXgYBCve96L1TgYG0fa-1hdFZ5ocBbB9wDMpKKQahnNNcbMnbs267_HPBejJzrA6nySbMSzVsZFpLpZpzW_LmH_QuL6X9a6UEFyA0rILsTLmSay0YzLHE2ZZfhoFZczDnHEyz16w5mPu28_pRednP6P9s_Da-AfwM1DZKByx_nf6v6gPkK5Ou</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932303802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-8921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-604X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28702841</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesia - adverse effects ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; Apnea ; Carbon dioxide ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clinical outcomes ; Deep Sedation - adverse effects ; Dentistry ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Ketamine ; Ketamine - therapeutic use ; Laser Therapy - adverse effects ; Lasers ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Midazolam ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Article ; Oximetry ; Pain perception ; Parents ; Patient safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Photonics ; Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Pulse duration ; Quantum Optics ; ROC Curve ; Stability analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tachycardia ; Wavelength</subject><ispartof>Lasers in medical science, 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Lasers in Medical Science is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28702841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristic, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trifunovic, Branislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majstorovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burazor, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><title>Lasers in medical science</title><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous</subject><subject>Apnea</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Deep Sedation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Ketamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulse duration</subject><subject>Quantum Optics</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tachycardia</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><issn>0268-8921</issn><issn>1435-604X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoO4uOPoD_AiAS9e2q18daePMqwfsODFBW8hk1TGrN3JmEzD-u83zawigqeiqKfeSt6XkFcM3jGA4aoyYCA6YEPH-aC6-ydkw6RQXQ_y21OyAd7rTo-cXZLntd5BA3smnpFLrgfgWrINibs8H22JNSeaA_2BJzvHhNQmvzY55ImGXKhHPNKK3p5iI9epTXY6YI2WxkTd9zj5gokuyWM55JgOdLIVCz2W7NAvBV-Qi2Cnii8f65bcfrj-uvvU3Xz5-Hn3_qZzYuCnDt0IXPqg2vvEXgYBCve96L1TgYG0fa-1hdFZ5ocBbB9wDMpKKQahnNNcbMnbs267_HPBejJzrA6nySbMSzVsZFpLpZpzW_LmH_QuL6X9a6UEFyA0rILsTLmSay0YzLHE2ZZfhoFZczDnHEyz16w5mPu28_pRednP6P9s_Da-AfwM1DZKByx_nf6v6gPkK5Ou</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Stevic, Marija</creator><creator>Ristic, Nina</creator><creator>Budic, Ivana</creator><creator>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creator><creator>Trifunovic, Branislav</creator><creator>Rakic, Ivan</creator><creator>Majstorovic, Marko</creator><creator>Burazor, Ivana</creator><creator>Simic, Dusica</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</title><author>Stevic, Marija ; Ristic, Nina ; Budic, Ivana ; Ladjevic, Nebojsa ; Trifunovic, Branislav ; Rakic, Ivan ; Majstorovic, Marko ; Burazor, Ivana ; Simic, Dusica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous</topic><topic>Apnea</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Deep Sedation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Ketamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulse duration</topic><topic>Quantum Optics</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tachycardia</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ristic, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trifunovic, Branislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majstorovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burazor, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dusica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevic, Marija</au><au>Ristic, Nina</au><au>Budic, Ivana</au><au>Ladjevic, Nebojsa</au><au>Trifunovic, Branislav</au><au>Rakic, Ivan</au><au>Majstorovic, Marko</au><au>Burazor, Ivana</au><au>Simic, Dusica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in medical science</jtitle><stitle>Lasers Med Sci</stitle><addtitle>Lasers Med Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1525</spage><epage>1533</epage><pages>1525-1533</pages><issn>0268-8921</issn><eissn>1435-604X</eissn><abstract>The aim of our study was to research and evaluate cardiovascular and respiratory stability, clinical efficacy, and safety of two different anesthetic agents in pediatric patients who underwent Pulse dye (wavelength 595 nm, pulse duration 0–40 ms, power 0–40 J) and CO 2 (wavelength 10,600 nm, intensity-fraxel mod with SX index 4 to 8, power 0–30 W) laser procedure. This prospective non-blinded study included 203 pediatric patients ASA I-II, aged between 1 month and 12 years who underwent short-term procedural sedation and analgesia for the laser procedure. After oral premedication with midazolam, 103 children were analgo-sedated with ketamine and fentanyl (K group) and 100 with ketofol and fentanyl (KT group). Vital signs, applied drug doses, pulse oximetry, and parental satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare these two groups. Statistical differences were tested using Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the cut-off value of the duration of anesthesia predicting apnea. Tachycardia was recorded in a significantly higher number of patients who received ketamine as the anesthetic agent (35.9 vs. 3% respectively). Hypertension was also significantly more frequent in patients who received ketamine in comparison with patients who received ketofol (25.2 vs. 3%). Laryngospasm was not observed in both examined groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in satisfaction of parents and doctors. Apnea and respiratory depression occurred significantly more frequent in ketofol than in ketamine group (12 vs. 0.97% and 13 vs. 0%). Based on ROC analysis for apnea, we found a significantly higher number of patients with apnea in the ketofol group when duration of anesthesia was longer than 17 min. Our study has shown that ketofol is more comfortable than ketamine in short-term laser procedures in children, causing less hemodynamic alteration with mild respiratory depression and less post-procedural adverse events.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>28702841</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-8921
ispartof Lasers in medical science, 2017-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1525-1533
issn 0268-8921
1435-604X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1918845510
source Springer Nature
subjects Analgesia
Analgesia - adverse effects
Anesthesia
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Apnea
Carbon dioxide
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Clinical outcomes
Deep Sedation - adverse effects
Dentistry
Female
Fentanyl
Humans
Hypertension
Ketamine
Ketamine - therapeutic use
Laser Therapy - adverse effects
Lasers
Male
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Midazolam
Optical Devices
Optics
Original Article
Oximetry
Pain perception
Parents
Patient safety
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Pediatrics
Photonics
Physicians
Prospective Studies
Pulse duration
Quantum Optics
ROC Curve
Stability analysis
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tachycardia
Wavelength
title Comparison of ketamine and ketofol for deep sedation and analgesia in children undergoing laser procedure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A59%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ketamine%20and%20ketofol%20for%20deep%20sedation%20and%20analgesia%20in%20children%20undergoing%20laser%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20medical%20science&rft.au=Stevic,%20Marija&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1525&rft.epage=1533&rft.pages=1525-1533&rft.issn=0268-8921&rft.eissn=1435-604X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10103-017-2275-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918845510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ec9024df52843b4f305eb636dc5f104a6688a09ca1d770a6fe9f5a443735cc823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932303802&rft_id=info:pmid/28702841&rfr_iscdi=true