Estimating Suspended Solids from Turbidity in the Robeson Creek, NC Watershed

The purpose of this project was to assess the effect of estimating total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations from turbidity on TSS loads for streams in the Robeson Creek watershed. Discharge was monitored continuously and base‐flow grab and storm event composite samples were collected and analyzed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2013-12, Vol.49 (6), p.1412-1420
Main Authors: Line, D.E., Hall, K.R., Blackwell, J.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
environmental sampling
Estimates
Estimating
Estimating techniques
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
Grabs
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Marine and continental quaternary
Monitoring
nonpoint source pollution
Outlets
Solids
Surficial geology
total suspended solids
Turbidity
Water quality
Water resources
Watersheds
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this project was to assess the effect of estimating total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations from turbidity on TSS loads for streams in the Robeson Creek watershed. Discharge was monitored continuously and base‐flow grab and storm event composite samples were collected and analyzed for TSS and turbidity from five sites during five years of monitoring. For base‐flow samples, the TSS‐turbidity relationship for all five sites was poor indicating that TSS concentrations in base flow cannot be estimated from a TSS‐turbidity relationship. To test the effect of analyzing fewer samples, TSS from every third and the first 20 samples collected from each site was used to develop TSS‐turbidity relationships. In addition, the TSS‐turbidity relationship developed from the most downstream site was used to estimate TSS concentrations from turbidity measured at the other four sites. For four of the five sites, analyzing every third sample for TSS and using the TSS‐turbidity relationship to estimate the missing TSS concentrations would result in mean TSS loads that were not significantly different from the observed. Using the TSS‐turbidity relationship from the outlet to estimate TSS from turbidity measured at the other four sites resulted in significantly different mean TSS loads at three of the four sites. These results indicate that estimating TSS concentrations from turbidity using a TSS‐turbidity relationship developed from a subset of the overall dataset should be done with great caution.
ISSN:1093-474X
1752-1688
DOI:10.1111/jawr.12094