Loading…

Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values

Analytical data for 10 major oxides (Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2), 16 total trace elements (As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Ga, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Th, V, Y, Zn and Zr), 14 aqua regia extracted elements (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo and Pb), Loss On Ignition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth and planetary science letters 2012-02, Vol.319-320, p.269-276
Main Authors: de Caritat, Patrice, Reimann, Clemens
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003
container_end_page 276
container_issue
container_start_page 269
container_title Earth and planetary science letters
container_volume 319-320
creator de Caritat, Patrice
Reimann, Clemens
description Analytical data for 10 major oxides (Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2), 16 total trace elements (As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Ga, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Th, V, Y, Zn and Zr), 14 aqua regia extracted elements (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo and Pb), Loss On Ignition (LOI) and pH from 3526 soil samples from two continents (Australia and Europe) are presented and compared to (1) the composition of the upper continental crust, (2) published world soil average values, and (3) data from other continental-scale soil surveys. It can be demonstrated that average upper continental crust values do not provide reliable estimates for natural concentrations of elements in soils. For many elements there exist substantial differences between published world soil averages and the median concentrations observed on two continents. Direct comparison with other continental datasets is hampered by the fact that often mean, instead of the statistically more robust median, is reported. Using a database of the worldwide distribution of lithological units, it can be demonstrated that lithology is a poor predictor of soil chemistry. Climate-related processes such as glaciation and weathering are strong modifiers of the geochemical signature inherited from bedrock during pedogenesis. To overcome existing shortcomings of predicted global or world soil geochemical reference values, we propose Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on analytical results of a representative number of soil samples from two continents (PEGS2). ► Continental-scale soil surveys over Europe and Australia have been completed. ► Exchanged standards ensured total and aqua regia concentrations can be compared. ► Published world soil reference values are unrealistic compared to empirical data. ► Climate is at least as important as lithology in defining soil composition. ► Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on 2 continents are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919962967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012821X11007539</els_id><sourcerecordid>1919962967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctu1DAUjRBIDIUfYOVlWST1tRMnltig0TBUqkSlgtSd5do3xSMnDrZnqv4KX4vDsIbVuYvz0D2nqt4DbYCCuDo0uCTfMArQAGso5y-qDfChqynw-5fVhlJg9cDg_nX1JqUDpVR0Qm6qX9swLTq6-ZFETEefExljmEh-CsSEObsZ56w9ecRgfuDkTLnTMZ7wOZEcyFOI3pIUnC_saQnJZRdmomdLLEZ3Wn1vI1pnMlqymxYX_1jsfXgocLcKL293-zv2oeSPGHE2SE7aHzG9rV6N2id89xcvqu-fd9-2X-qbr_vr7aebWrec51oMg33oe95akGKgdrQ97TWjWjM-tgNtOehBjJ2WTA9t1wOzlDI2SCOoLD3wi-ry7LvE8LPkZjW5ZNB7PWM4JgUSpBRMiv7_VNEBl8AFK1R2ppoYUiq_qSW6ScdnBVStm6mDWjdT62YKmCqbFdHHswjLvyeHUSXj1kqsi2iyssH9S_4bHtyhTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651391362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Caritat, Patrice ; Reimann, Clemens</creator><creatorcontrib>de Caritat, Patrice ; Reimann, Clemens ; NGSA Project Team ; GEMAS Project Team</creatorcontrib><description>Analytical data for 10 major oxides (Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2), 16 total trace elements (As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Ga, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Th, V, Y, Zn and Zr), 14 aqua regia extracted elements (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo and Pb), Loss On Ignition (LOI) and pH from 3526 soil samples from two continents (Australia and Europe) are presented and compared to (1) the composition of the upper continental crust, (2) published world soil average values, and (3) data from other continental-scale soil surveys. It can be demonstrated that average upper continental crust values do not provide reliable estimates for natural concentrations of elements in soils. For many elements there exist substantial differences between published world soil averages and the median concentrations observed on two continents. Direct comparison with other continental datasets is hampered by the fact that often mean, instead of the statistically more robust median, is reported. Using a database of the worldwide distribution of lithological units, it can be demonstrated that lithology is a poor predictor of soil chemistry. Climate-related processes such as glaciation and weathering are strong modifiers of the geochemical signature inherited from bedrock during pedogenesis. To overcome existing shortcomings of predicted global or world soil geochemical reference values, we propose Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on analytical results of a representative number of soil samples from two continents (PEGS2). ► Continental-scale soil surveys over Europe and Australia have been completed. ► Exchanged standards ensured total and aqua regia concentrations can be compared. ► Published world soil reference values are unrealistic compared to empirical data. ► Climate is at least as important as lithology in defining soil composition. ► Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on 2 continents are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-821X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1385-013X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Continents ; Critical Zone ; Crusts ; Geochemistry ; global soil composition ; major elements ; regolith ; Soil (material) ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Titanium dioxide ; trace elements</subject><ispartof>Earth and planetary science letters, 2012-02, Vol.319-320, p.269-276</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Caritat, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimann, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NGSA Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEMAS Project Team</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values</title><title>Earth and planetary science letters</title><description>Analytical data for 10 major oxides (Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2), 16 total trace elements (As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Ga, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Th, V, Y, Zn and Zr), 14 aqua regia extracted elements (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo and Pb), Loss On Ignition (LOI) and pH from 3526 soil samples from two continents (Australia and Europe) are presented and compared to (1) the composition of the upper continental crust, (2) published world soil average values, and (3) data from other continental-scale soil surveys. It can be demonstrated that average upper continental crust values do not provide reliable estimates for natural concentrations of elements in soils. For many elements there exist substantial differences between published world soil averages and the median concentrations observed on two continents. Direct comparison with other continental datasets is hampered by the fact that often mean, instead of the statistically more robust median, is reported. Using a database of the worldwide distribution of lithological units, it can be demonstrated that lithology is a poor predictor of soil chemistry. Climate-related processes such as glaciation and weathering are strong modifiers of the geochemical signature inherited from bedrock during pedogenesis. To overcome existing shortcomings of predicted global or world soil geochemical reference values, we propose Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on analytical results of a representative number of soil samples from two continents (PEGS2). ► Continental-scale soil surveys over Europe and Australia have been completed. ► Exchanged standards ensured total and aqua regia concentrations can be compared. ► Published world soil reference values are unrealistic compared to empirical data. ► Climate is at least as important as lithology in defining soil composition. ► Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on 2 continents are proposed.</description><subject>Continents</subject><subject>Critical Zone</subject><subject>Crusts</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>global soil composition</subject><subject>major elements</subject><subject>regolith</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>trace elements</subject><issn>0012-821X</issn><issn>1385-013X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctu1DAUjRBIDIUfYOVlWST1tRMnltig0TBUqkSlgtSd5do3xSMnDrZnqv4KX4vDsIbVuYvz0D2nqt4DbYCCuDo0uCTfMArQAGso5y-qDfChqynw-5fVhlJg9cDg_nX1JqUDpVR0Qm6qX9swLTq6-ZFETEefExljmEh-CsSEObsZ56w9ecRgfuDkTLnTMZ7wOZEcyFOI3pIUnC_saQnJZRdmomdLLEZ3Wn1vI1pnMlqymxYX_1jsfXgocLcKL293-zv2oeSPGHE2SE7aHzG9rV6N2id89xcvqu-fd9-2X-qbr_vr7aebWrec51oMg33oe95akGKgdrQ97TWjWjM-tgNtOehBjJ2WTA9t1wOzlDI2SCOoLD3wi-ry7LvE8LPkZjW5ZNB7PWM4JgUSpBRMiv7_VNEBl8AFK1R2ppoYUiq_qSW6ScdnBVStm6mDWjdT62YKmCqbFdHHswjLvyeHUSXj1kqsi2iyssH9S_4bHtyhTA</recordid><startdate>20120215</startdate><enddate>20120215</enddate><creator>de Caritat, Patrice</creator><creator>Reimann, Clemens</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120215</creationdate><title>Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values</title><author>de Caritat, Patrice ; Reimann, Clemens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Continents</topic><topic>Critical Zone</topic><topic>Crusts</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>global soil composition</topic><topic>major elements</topic><topic>regolith</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>trace elements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Caritat, Patrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimann, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NGSA Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEMAS Project Team</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Caritat, Patrice</au><au>Reimann, Clemens</au><aucorp>NGSA Project Team</aucorp><aucorp>GEMAS Project Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values</atitle><jtitle>Earth and planetary science letters</jtitle><date>2012-02-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>319-320</volume><spage>269</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>269-276</pages><issn>0012-821X</issn><eissn>1385-013X</eissn><abstract>Analytical data for 10 major oxides (Al2O3, CaO, Fe2O3, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, P2O5, SiO2 and TiO2), 16 total trace elements (As, Ba, Ce, Co, Cr, Ga, Nb, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Th, V, Y, Zn and Zr), 14 aqua regia extracted elements (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo and Pb), Loss On Ignition (LOI) and pH from 3526 soil samples from two continents (Australia and Europe) are presented and compared to (1) the composition of the upper continental crust, (2) published world soil average values, and (3) data from other continental-scale soil surveys. It can be demonstrated that average upper continental crust values do not provide reliable estimates for natural concentrations of elements in soils. For many elements there exist substantial differences between published world soil averages and the median concentrations observed on two continents. Direct comparison with other continental datasets is hampered by the fact that often mean, instead of the statistically more robust median, is reported. Using a database of the worldwide distribution of lithological units, it can be demonstrated that lithology is a poor predictor of soil chemistry. Climate-related processes such as glaciation and weathering are strong modifiers of the geochemical signature inherited from bedrock during pedogenesis. To overcome existing shortcomings of predicted global or world soil geochemical reference values, we propose Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on analytical results of a representative number of soil samples from two continents (PEGS2). ► Continental-scale soil surveys over Europe and Australia have been completed. ► Exchanged standards ensured total and aqua regia concentrations can be compared. ► Published world soil reference values are unrealistic compared to empirical data. ► Climate is at least as important as lithology in defining soil composition. ► Preliminary Empirical Global Soil reference values based on 2 continents are proposed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.033</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-821X
ispartof Earth and planetary science letters, 2012-02, Vol.319-320, p.269-276
issn 0012-821X
1385-013X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919962967
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Continents
Critical Zone
Crusts
Geochemistry
global soil composition
major elements
regolith
Soil (material)
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Titanium dioxide
trace elements
title Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20results%20from%20two%20continental%20geochemical%20surveys%20to%20world%20soil%20composition%20and%20deriving%20Predicted%20Empirical%20Global%20Soil%20(PEGS2)%20reference%20values&rft.jtitle=Earth%20and%20planetary%20science%20letters&rft.au=de%20Caritat,%20Patrice&rft.aucorp=NGSA%20Project%20Team&rft.date=2012-02-15&rft.volume=319-320&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=269-276&rft.issn=0012-821X&rft.eissn=1385-013X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919962967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-688db7734d19680dfd707a20aa23f480431a86f5a92a845712d002289c6090003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651391362&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true