Loading…
Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study
In the distal left main (LM) atherosclerosis mainly develops within bifurcation or trifur-cation. The aim of this study was to analyze the strategy of distal LM stenosis treatment and associated clinical outcomes in a large hospital in Northern Poland. The study population consisted of consecutive p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cardiology journal 2018-01, Vol.25 (2), p.188-195 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 195 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Cardiology journal |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Kern, Adam Gil, Robert J Bojko, Krystian Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej Bednarski, Krzysztof Górny, Jerzy Bil, Jacek |
description | In the distal left main (LM) atherosclerosis mainly develops within bifurcation or trifur-cation. The aim of this study was to analyze the strategy of distal LM stenosis treatment and associated clinical outcomes in a large hospital in Northern Poland.
The study population consisted of consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and distal LM stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2012 and June 2013. Patients were treated with regular drug-eluting stents (rDES), including bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, or dedicated bifurcation stents (BiOSS LIM®). Clinical outcomes were analyzed at 12, 24 and 36 months. Primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inducing rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 36 months.
One hundred and two patients were identified, 90 of whom were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (56 rDES, including 9 Absorb, and 34 BiOSS) with no stent implantation fail-ure. In 15 (16.7%) patients rDES was required within side branch (SB). After 36 months MACE rate was 19.0% (BiOSS: 18.8% vs. rDES 19.2%), whereas TLR rate was 10.7% (BiOSS 12.5% vs. rDES 9.6%). In logistic regression for 36-month TLR rate proximal optimization technique (OR 0.311, 95% CI 0.211-0.644) was a prognostic factor of better clinical outcome, whereas non-ST-elevation ACS (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.642-5.110), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR 2.771, 95% CI 1.325-7.209) and SB stenting (OR 1.141, 95% CI 1.002-1.881) were risk factors of poor outcome.
Regular drug-eluting stents as well as dedicated bifurcation BiOSS LIM® stents enabled a simple and fast distal LM treatment option with a single stent. Both resulted in comparable MACE and TLR rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0084 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920193917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920193917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-274f5f4c7941e121c255bbd17cee4f12652da3e1b94ab8dbcaff45e8d81c12cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoWh9HrxLw4mVrkk324a2sz1LwoueQTSYlst2teQj9791aFfE0A99vPmbmQ-ickqkoSH7dzKeKEVpOCan4HprQqi4zIep8_09_hI5DeCOkqIVgh-iIVSXlgokJGm7BOK0iGNw6m_zYuqHHIUIfAx489rBMnfLY-LTE0KXo-uWP7HpsXIiqwx3YiFfK7SaH4MINno2z0Q9hDTq6DxiVZDan6MCqLsDZdz1Br_d3L81jtnh-eGpmi0zntIgZK7kVluuy5hQoo5oJ0baGlhqAW8oKwYzKgbY1V21lWq2s5QIqU1FNmdb5Cbra-a798J4gRLlyQUPXqR6GFCStx6fVeU3LEb38h74NyffjdpLxgjMiBN9S2Y7S40nBg5Vr71bKbyQlcpuEbObyKwm5TWLkL75dU7sC80v_vD7_BCoEhX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464205547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Kern, Adam ; Gil, Robert J ; Bojko, Krystian ; Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej ; Bednarski, Krzysztof ; Górny, Jerzy ; Bil, Jacek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kern, Adam ; Gil, Robert J ; Bojko, Krystian ; Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej ; Bednarski, Krzysztof ; Górny, Jerzy ; Bil, Jacek</creatorcontrib><description>In the distal left main (LM) atherosclerosis mainly develops within bifurcation or trifur-cation. The aim of this study was to analyze the strategy of distal LM stenosis treatment and associated clinical outcomes in a large hospital in Northern Poland.
The study population consisted of consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and distal LM stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2012 and June 2013. Patients were treated with regular drug-eluting stents (rDES), including bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, or dedicated bifurcation stents (BiOSS LIM®). Clinical outcomes were analyzed at 12, 24 and 36 months. Primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inducing rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 36 months.
One hundred and two patients were identified, 90 of whom were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (56 rDES, including 9 Absorb, and 34 BiOSS) with no stent implantation fail-ure. In 15 (16.7%) patients rDES was required within side branch (SB). After 36 months MACE rate was 19.0% (BiOSS: 18.8% vs. rDES 19.2%), whereas TLR rate was 10.7% (BiOSS 12.5% vs. rDES 9.6%). In logistic regression for 36-month TLR rate proximal optimization technique (OR 0.311, 95% CI 0.211-0.644) was a prognostic factor of better clinical outcome, whereas non-ST-elevation ACS (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.642-5.110), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR 2.771, 95% CI 1.325-7.209) and SB stenting (OR 1.141, 95% CI 1.002-1.881) were risk factors of poor outcome.
Regular drug-eluting stents as well as dedicated bifurcation BiOSS LIM® stents enabled a simple and fast distal LM treatment option with a single stent. Both resulted in comparable MACE and TLR rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1897-5593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1897-5593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1898-018X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28714525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Clinical outcomes ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Stenosis - surgery ; Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels - surgery ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology ; Incidence ; Male ; Optimization techniques ; Paclitaxel - pharmacology ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Poland - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Sirolimus - pharmacology ; Stents ; Survival Rate - trends ; Tissue Scaffolds ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cardiology journal, 2018-01, Vol.25 (2), p.188-195</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2464205547?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28714525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kern, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bojko, Krystian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednarski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górny, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bil, Jacek</creatorcontrib><title>Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study</title><title>Cardiology journal</title><addtitle>Cardiol J</addtitle><description>In the distal left main (LM) atherosclerosis mainly develops within bifurcation or trifur-cation. The aim of this study was to analyze the strategy of distal LM stenosis treatment and associated clinical outcomes in a large hospital in Northern Poland.
The study population consisted of consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and distal LM stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2012 and June 2013. Patients were treated with regular drug-eluting stents (rDES), including bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, or dedicated bifurcation stents (BiOSS LIM®). Clinical outcomes were analyzed at 12, 24 and 36 months. Primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inducing rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 36 months.
One hundred and two patients were identified, 90 of whom were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (56 rDES, including 9 Absorb, and 34 BiOSS) with no stent implantation fail-ure. In 15 (16.7%) patients rDES was required within side branch (SB). After 36 months MACE rate was 19.0% (BiOSS: 18.8% vs. rDES 19.2%), whereas TLR rate was 10.7% (BiOSS 12.5% vs. rDES 9.6%). In logistic regression for 36-month TLR rate proximal optimization technique (OR 0.311, 95% CI 0.211-0.644) was a prognostic factor of better clinical outcome, whereas non-ST-elevation ACS (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.642-5.110), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR 2.771, 95% CI 1.325-7.209) and SB stenting (OR 1.141, 95% CI 1.002-1.881) were risk factors of poor outcome.
Regular drug-eluting stents as well as dedicated bifurcation BiOSS LIM® stents enabled a simple and fast distal LM treatment option with a single stent. Both resulted in comparable MACE and TLR rates.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - surgery</subject><subject>Drug-Eluting Stents</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Paclitaxel - pharmacology</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Poland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sirolimus - pharmacology</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1897-5593</issn><issn>1897-5593</issn><issn>1898-018X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoWh9HrxLw4mVrkk324a2sz1LwoueQTSYlst2teQj9791aFfE0A99vPmbmQ-ickqkoSH7dzKeKEVpOCan4HprQqi4zIep8_09_hI5DeCOkqIVgh-iIVSXlgokJGm7BOK0iGNw6m_zYuqHHIUIfAx489rBMnfLY-LTE0KXo-uWP7HpsXIiqwx3YiFfK7SaH4MINno2z0Q9hDTq6DxiVZDan6MCqLsDZdz1Br_d3L81jtnh-eGpmi0zntIgZK7kVluuy5hQoo5oJ0baGlhqAW8oKwYzKgbY1V21lWq2s5QIqU1FNmdb5Cbra-a798J4gRLlyQUPXqR6GFCStx6fVeU3LEb38h74NyffjdpLxgjMiBN9S2Y7S40nBg5Vr71bKbyQlcpuEbObyKwm5TWLkL75dU7sC80v_vD7_BCoEhX4</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Kern, Adam</creator><creator>Gil, Robert J</creator><creator>Bojko, Krystian</creator><creator>Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej</creator><creator>Bednarski, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Górny, Jerzy</creator><creator>Bil, Jacek</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study</title><author>Kern, Adam ; Gil, Robert J ; Bojko, Krystian ; Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej ; Bednarski, Krzysztof ; Górny, Jerzy ; Bil, Jacek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-274f5f4c7941e121c255bbd17cee4f12652da3e1b94ab8dbcaff45e8d81c12cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - surgery</topic><topic>Drug-Eluting Stents</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Paclitaxel - pharmacology</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Poland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sirolimus - pharmacology</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kern, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bojko, Krystian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednarski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Górny, Jerzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bil, Jacek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kern, Adam</au><au>Gil, Robert J</au><au>Bojko, Krystian</au><au>Rzeszowski, Bartłomiej</au><au>Bednarski, Krzysztof</au><au>Górny, Jerzy</au><au>Bil, Jacek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Cardiology journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiol J</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>188-195</pages><issn>1897-5593</issn><eissn>1897-5593</eissn><eissn>1898-018X</eissn><abstract>In the distal left main (LM) atherosclerosis mainly develops within bifurcation or trifur-cation. The aim of this study was to analyze the strategy of distal LM stenosis treatment and associated clinical outcomes in a large hospital in Northern Poland.
The study population consisted of consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and distal LM stenosis who were hospitalized between June 2012 and June 2013. Patients were treated with regular drug-eluting stents (rDES), including bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, or dedicated bifurcation stents (BiOSS LIM®). Clinical outcomes were analyzed at 12, 24 and 36 months. Primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inducing rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 36 months.
One hundred and two patients were identified, 90 of whom were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (56 rDES, including 9 Absorb, and 34 BiOSS) with no stent implantation fail-ure. In 15 (16.7%) patients rDES was required within side branch (SB). After 36 months MACE rate was 19.0% (BiOSS: 18.8% vs. rDES 19.2%), whereas TLR rate was 10.7% (BiOSS 12.5% vs. rDES 9.6%). In logistic regression for 36-month TLR rate proximal optimization technique (OR 0.311, 95% CI 0.211-0.644) was a prognostic factor of better clinical outcome, whereas non-ST-elevation ACS (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.642-5.110), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (OR 2.771, 95% CI 1.325-7.209) and SB stenting (OR 1.141, 95% CI 1.002-1.881) were risk factors of poor outcome.
Regular drug-eluting stents as well as dedicated bifurcation BiOSS LIM® stents enabled a simple and fast distal LM treatment option with a single stent. Both resulted in comparable MACE and TLR rates.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><pmid>28714525</pmid><doi>10.5603/CJ.a2017.0084</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1897-5593 |
ispartof | Cardiology journal, 2018-01, Vol.25 (2), p.188-195 |
issn | 1897-5593 1897-5593 1898-018X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920193917 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Acute coronary syndromes Aged Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology Cardiovascular disease Clinical outcomes Coronary Angiography - methods Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis Coronary Stenosis - surgery Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging Coronary Vessels - surgery Drug-Eluting Stents Female Follow-Up Studies Heart attacks Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology Incidence Male Optimization techniques Paclitaxel - pharmacology Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods Poland - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Prosthesis Design Retrospective Studies Sirolimus - pharmacology Stents Survival Rate - trends Tissue Scaffolds Treatment Outcome |
title | Dedicated bifurcation stents or regular drug eluting stents in distal left main stenosis: A retrospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dedicated%20bifurcation%20stents%20or%20regular%20drug%20eluting%20stents%20in%20distal%20left%20main%20stenosis:%20A%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Cardiology%20journal&rft.au=Kern,%20Adam&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=188-195&rft.issn=1897-5593&rft.eissn=1897-5593&rft_id=info:doi/10.5603/CJ.a2017.0084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920193917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-274f5f4c7941e121c255bbd17cee4f12652da3e1b94ab8dbcaff45e8d81c12cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464205547&rft_id=info:pmid/28714525&rfr_iscdi=true |