Biopsychosocial risk factors of persistent fatigue after acute infection: A systematic review to inform interventions

• Published in: Journal of psychosomatic research 2017-08, Vol.99, p.120-129
• Main Authors: Hulme, Katrin, Hudson, Joanna L, Rojczyk, Philine, Little, Paul, Moss-Morris, Rona
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Behavioral responses; Biopsychosocial; Biopsychosocial aspects; Clinical assessment; Clinical trials; Cognitive ability; Dengue fever; Emotional behavior; Fatigue; Fatigue - complications; Fatigue - etiology; Humans; Immunization; Infections; Intervention; Male; Medical diagnosis; Middle Aged; Narrative synthesis; Post-infection; Prospective Studies; Psychiatry; Psychological distress; Q fever; Risk Factors; Self report; Systematic review; Vaccination; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0022-3999; 1879-1360
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.013

Abstract Objectives Fatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom, preceded by an acute infectious episode in some patients. This systematic review aimed to identify risk factors for the development of persistent fatigue after an acute infection, to develop an evidence-based working model of post-infectious fatigue. Methods Electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE) were searched, from inception to March 2016, for studies which investigated biopsychosocial risk factors of on-going fatigue after an acute infection. Inclusion criteria were: prospective design; biological, psychological or social risk factors; standardised measure of post-infectious fatigue (self-report scales or clinical diagnosis). Studies were excluded if the sample had a pre-existing medical condition, infection was conceptualised as ‘vaccination’ or they were intervention trials. A narrative synthesis was performed. Results Eighty-one full texts were screened, of which seventeen were included in the review. Over half included glandular fever populations. Other infections included dengue fever, ‘general’/‘viral’ and Q-fever. Risk factors were summarised under biological, social, behavioural, cognitive and emotional subthemes. Patients' cognitive and behavioural responses to the acute illness, and pre-infection or baseline distress and fatigue were the most consistent risk factors for post-infectious fatigue. Conclusion An empirical summary model is provided, highlighting the risk factors most consistently associated with persistent fatigue. The components of the model, the possible interaction of risk factors and implications for understanding the fatigue trajectory and informing preventative treatments are discussed.