Loading…
Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques for liver biopsy collection in dogs
Objectives High‐quality biopsy is an essential factor for the successful diagnosis of canine liver disease. The aim of this study was to compare various aspects of biopsies obtained by two different techniques: pretied ligating loop and cup biopsy forceps. Materials and Methods Fifteen client‐owned...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of small animal practice 2017-10, Vol.58 (10), p.555-561 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
High‐quality biopsy is an essential factor for the successful diagnosis of canine liver disease. The aim of this study was to compare various aspects of biopsies obtained by two different techniques: pretied ligating loop and cup biopsy forceps.
Materials and Methods
Fifteen client‐owned dogs underwent laparoscopic liver biopsies for diagnosis of liver disease. Biopsies were obtained from the same liver lobe using a pre‐tied ligating loop and cup biopsy forceps. Biopsy weight, volume, histological value and surgical time were compared between the two techniques. Surgical complications were recorded.
Results
Samples obtained with the pre‐tied ligating loop were significantly heavier and larger in volume than those obtained with cup biopsy forceps. Samples obtained with the ligating loop contained significantly more portal tracts and less crush and fragmentation artefacts. The time required to obtain a liver biopsy with the pre‐tied ligating loop was approximately double that of the cup biopsy forceps technique.
Clinical Significance
The use of a pre‐tied ligating loop is a good alternative to the cup biopsy forceps technique when acquiring laparoscopic liver biopsies in dogs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4510 1748-5827 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jsap.12708 |