Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters

A popular assumption in evolutionary psychology claims that reciprocal altruism is supported by a cognitive module that helps individuals to detect and remember cheaters. Previous studies found a source memory advantage for faces of cheaters rather than faces of cooperators. The present study examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.1129-1137
Main Author: Kroneisen, Meike
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Alliances
Altruism
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cheating
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Cooperation
Deception
Experimental psychology
Face
Facial Recognition - physiology
Female
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Memory
Memory, Episodic
Mental Recall - physiology
Psychology
Research methodology
Social Perception
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A popular assumption in evolutionary psychology claims that reciprocal altruism is supported by a cognitive module that helps individuals to detect and remember cheaters. Previous studies found a source memory advantage for faces of cheaters rather than faces of cooperators. The present study examines memory for social-exchange relevant information. More precisely, faces were shown together with behavior descriptions of cheating, trustworthy and neutral behavior either high or low in relevance for a student population. A multinomial model was used to measure old–new discrimination, source memory, and guessing biases separately. The study showed a source memory advantage for cheaters high in relevance. However, source memory for trustworthy persons low and high in relevance was also enhanced. The results are in line with the assumption of a flexible mechanism that focuses on exchange-relevant information. A system that is able to take into account the relative significance of information may be more beneficial than a system focusing on every cheater independently of his or her relative importance.
ISSN:1069-9384
1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-017-1345-1