Loading…
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis
Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design,...
Saved in:
Published in: | European urology focus 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003 |
container_end_page | 259 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | European urology focus |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Vetterlein, Malte W Seisen, Thomas May, Matthias Nuhn, Philipp Gierth, Michael Mayr, Roman Fritsche, Hans-Martin Burger, Maximilian Novotny, Vladimir Froehner, Michael Wirth, Manfred P Protzel, Chris Hakenberg, Oliver W Roghmann, Florian Palisaar, Rein-Jüri Noldus, Joachim Pycha, Armin Bastian, Patrick J Trinh, Quoc-Dien Xylinas, Evanguelos Shariat, Shahrokh F Rink, Michael Chun, Felix K.-H Dahlem, Roland Fisch, Margit Aziz, Atiqullah |
description | Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924599046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S2405456916300992</els_id><sourcerecordid>1924599046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7BBXrKZ1E7sZAIS0jAqP9IAo5aKpeXY1x1PnTjYyUjZ8Q68IeJBsDUFIRasbF-dc66vP2fZU4Jzgkl1sc9h0nkRtzmuc4zJg-y0oJgtKKuah3_tT7LzEPY4Khity2X5ODspljUr65qdZj8vtQY5mgP0EAJyGq3UfjqIfkTrHXRu3IEXw4xWegSProQyUli0nsMYXa6bkXYebVws2ihS0ShBIdGri1jfgj0YiTZzN-zQR6fgx7fvWxdMaoc-TEFaWJj-IEI63_jUzJoUL7w0vetEuk8sotdWKAX-BVqhrXcD9DFjRtfS-RT5Bcztboxt164bYDT9Lboy4S6gVS_sHEx4kj3SwgY4v1_Psps3l5_X7xabT2_fr1ebhaQ1HRdMA8OsrFpSlpS2TQNVXciKgVYUq2rJCkKbUkCtKWDdqKWiEkvStq1eNgrj8ix7fswdvPs6QRh5Z4IEa0UPbgqcNAVlTYNpFaXkKJXeheBB88GbTviZE8wTX77nkS9PfDmueaQXPc_u46e2A_XH8ZtmFLw8CiAOeTDgeZAGEhHjIy6unPlv_Kt_3NKaPvG-gxnC3k0-vmecgoeCY36dPlj6X6QqMW6aovwFh67RnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924599046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah ; for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group ; PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28753775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Cystectomy ; Cystectomy - methods ; Cytotoxins - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy ; Propensity score ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder - pathology ; Urinary Bladder - surgery ; Urinary bladder neoplasms ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology focus, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2016 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seisen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhn, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Manfred P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pycha, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rink, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlem, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Atiqullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><title>European urology focus</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</description><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cytotoxins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</subject><subject>Propensity score</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary bladder neoplasms</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2405-4569</issn><issn>2405-4569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7BBXrKZ1E7sZAIS0jAqP9IAo5aKpeXY1x1PnTjYyUjZ8Q68IeJBsDUFIRasbF-dc66vP2fZU4Jzgkl1sc9h0nkRtzmuc4zJg-y0oJgtKKuah3_tT7LzEPY4Khity2X5ODspljUr65qdZj8vtQY5mgP0EAJyGq3UfjqIfkTrHXRu3IEXw4xWegSProQyUli0nsMYXa6bkXYebVws2ihS0ShBIdGri1jfgj0YiTZzN-zQR6fgx7fvWxdMaoc-TEFaWJj-IEI63_jUzJoUL7w0vetEuk8sotdWKAX-BVqhrXcD9DFjRtfS-RT5Bcztboxt164bYDT9Lboy4S6gVS_sHEx4kj3SwgY4v1_Psps3l5_X7xabT2_fr1ebhaQ1HRdMA8OsrFpSlpS2TQNVXciKgVYUq2rJCkKbUkCtKWDdqKWiEkvStq1eNgrj8ix7fswdvPs6QRh5Z4IEa0UPbgqcNAVlTYNpFaXkKJXeheBB88GbTviZE8wTX77nkS9PfDmueaQXPc_u46e2A_XH8ZtmFLw8CiAOeTDgeZAGEhHjIy6unPlv_Kt_3NKaPvG-gxnC3k0-vmecgoeCY36dPlj6X6QqMW6aovwFh67RnA</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Vetterlein, Malte W</creator><creator>Seisen, Thomas</creator><creator>May, Matthias</creator><creator>Nuhn, Philipp</creator><creator>Gierth, Michael</creator><creator>Mayr, Roman</creator><creator>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creator><creator>Burger, Maximilian</creator><creator>Novotny, Vladimir</creator><creator>Froehner, Michael</creator><creator>Wirth, Manfred P</creator><creator>Protzel, Chris</creator><creator>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creator><creator>Roghmann, Florian</creator><creator>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creator><creator>Noldus, Joachim</creator><creator>Pycha, Armin</creator><creator>Bastian, Patrick J</creator><creator>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creator><creator>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creator><creator>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creator><creator>Rink, Michael</creator><creator>Chun, Felix K.-H</creator><creator>Dahlem, Roland</creator><creator>Fisch, Margit</creator><creator>Aziz, Atiqullah</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><author>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cytotoxins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</topic><topic>Propensity score</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary bladder neoplasms</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seisen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhn, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Manfred P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pycha, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rink, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlem, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Atiqullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vetterlein, Malte W</au><au>Seisen, Thomas</au><au>May, Matthias</au><au>Nuhn, Philipp</au><au>Gierth, Michael</au><au>Mayr, Roman</au><au>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</au><au>Burger, Maximilian</au><au>Novotny, Vladimir</au><au>Froehner, Michael</au><au>Wirth, Manfred P</au><au>Protzel, Chris</au><au>Hakenberg, Oliver W</au><au>Roghmann, Florian</au><au>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</au><au>Noldus, Joachim</au><au>Pycha, Armin</au><au>Bastian, Patrick J</au><au>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</au><au>Xylinas, Evanguelos</au><au>Shariat, Shahrokh F</au><au>Rink, Michael</au><au>Chun, Felix K.-H</au><au>Dahlem, Roland</au><au>Fisch, Margit</au><au>Aziz, Atiqullah</au><aucorp>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</atitle><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>252-259</pages><issn>2405-4569</issn><eissn>2405-4569</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28753775</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2405-4569 |
ispartof | European urology focus, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259 |
issn | 2405-4569 2405-4569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924599046 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adjuvant chemotherapy Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects Cisplatin - therapeutic use Cystectomy Cystectomy - methods Cytotoxins - therapeutic use Female Humans Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy Propensity score Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Survival Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder - pathology Urinary Bladder - surgery Urinary bladder neoplasms Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urology |
title | Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Adjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20After%20Radical%20Cystectomy%20for%20Locally%20Advanced%20and/or%20Pelvic%20Lymph%20Node%E2%80%93Positive%20Muscle-invasive%20Urothelial%20Carcinoma%20of%20the%20Bladder:%20A%20Propensity%20Score%E2%80%93Weighted%20Competing%20Risks%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20focus&rft.au=Vetterlein,%20Malte%20W&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20PROMETRICS%202011%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=252-259&rft.issn=2405-4569&rft.eissn=2405-4569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924599046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924599046&rft_id=info:pmid/28753775&rfr_iscdi=true |