Loading…

Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis

Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urology focus 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259
Main Authors: Vetterlein, Malte W, Seisen, Thomas, May, Matthias, Nuhn, Philipp, Gierth, Michael, Mayr, Roman, Fritsche, Hans-Martin, Burger, Maximilian, Novotny, Vladimir, Froehner, Michael, Wirth, Manfred P, Protzel, Chris, Hakenberg, Oliver W, Roghmann, Florian, Palisaar, Rein-Jüri, Noldus, Joachim, Pycha, Armin, Bastian, Patrick J, Trinh, Quoc-Dien, Xylinas, Evanguelos, Shariat, Shahrokh F, Rink, Michael, Chun, Felix K.-H, Dahlem, Roland, Fisch, Margit, Aziz, Atiqullah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003
container_end_page 259
container_issue 2
container_start_page 252
container_title European urology focus
container_volume 4
creator Vetterlein, Malte W
Seisen, Thomas
May, Matthias
Nuhn, Philipp
Gierth, Michael
Mayr, Roman
Fritsche, Hans-Martin
Burger, Maximilian
Novotny, Vladimir
Froehner, Michael
Wirth, Manfred P
Protzel, Chris
Hakenberg, Oliver W
Roghmann, Florian
Palisaar, Rein-Jüri
Noldus, Joachim
Pycha, Armin
Bastian, Patrick J
Trinh, Quoc-Dien
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Shariat, Shahrokh F
Rink, Michael
Chun, Felix K.-H
Dahlem, Roland
Fisch, Margit
Aziz, Atiqullah
description Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924599046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S2405456916300992</els_id><sourcerecordid>1924599046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7BBXrKZ1E7sZAIS0jAqP9IAo5aKpeXY1x1PnTjYyUjZ8Q68IeJBsDUFIRasbF-dc66vP2fZU4Jzgkl1sc9h0nkRtzmuc4zJg-y0oJgtKKuah3_tT7LzEPY4Khity2X5ODspljUr65qdZj8vtQY5mgP0EAJyGq3UfjqIfkTrHXRu3IEXw4xWegSProQyUli0nsMYXa6bkXYebVws2ihS0ShBIdGri1jfgj0YiTZzN-zQR6fgx7fvWxdMaoc-TEFaWJj-IEI63_jUzJoUL7w0vetEuk8sotdWKAX-BVqhrXcD9DFjRtfS-RT5Bcztboxt164bYDT9Lboy4S6gVS_sHEx4kj3SwgY4v1_Psps3l5_X7xabT2_fr1ebhaQ1HRdMA8OsrFpSlpS2TQNVXciKgVYUq2rJCkKbUkCtKWDdqKWiEkvStq1eNgrj8ix7fswdvPs6QRh5Z4IEa0UPbgqcNAVlTYNpFaXkKJXeheBB88GbTviZE8wTX77nkS9PfDmueaQXPc_u46e2A_XH8ZtmFLw8CiAOeTDgeZAGEhHjIy6unPlv_Kt_3NKaPvG-gxnC3k0-vmecgoeCY36dPlj6X6QqMW6aovwFh67RnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924599046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah ; for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group ; PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28753775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Cystectomy ; Cystectomy - methods ; Cytotoxins - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy ; Propensity score ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder - pathology ; Urinary Bladder - surgery ; Urinary bladder neoplasms ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology focus, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2016 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28753775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seisen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhn, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Manfred P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pycha, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rink, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlem, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Atiqullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><title>European urology focus</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</description><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cystectomy</subject><subject>Cystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cytotoxins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</subject><subject>Propensity score</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary bladder neoplasms</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2405-4569</issn><issn>2405-4569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEolXpA7BBXrKZ1E7sZAIS0jAqP9IAo5aKpeXY1x1PnTjYyUjZ8Q68IeJBsDUFIRasbF-dc66vP2fZU4Jzgkl1sc9h0nkRtzmuc4zJg-y0oJgtKKuah3_tT7LzEPY4Khity2X5ODspljUr65qdZj8vtQY5mgP0EAJyGq3UfjqIfkTrHXRu3IEXw4xWegSProQyUli0nsMYXa6bkXYebVws2ihS0ShBIdGri1jfgj0YiTZzN-zQR6fgx7fvWxdMaoc-TEFaWJj-IEI63_jUzJoUL7w0vetEuk8sotdWKAX-BVqhrXcD9DFjRtfS-RT5Bcztboxt164bYDT9Lboy4S6gVS_sHEx4kj3SwgY4v1_Psps3l5_X7xabT2_fr1ebhaQ1HRdMA8OsrFpSlpS2TQNVXciKgVYUq2rJCkKbUkCtKWDdqKWiEkvStq1eNgrj8ix7fswdvPs6QRh5Z4IEa0UPbgqcNAVlTYNpFaXkKJXeheBB88GbTviZE8wTX77nkS9PfDmueaQXPc_u46e2A_XH8ZtmFLw8CiAOeTDgeZAGEhHjIy6unPlv_Kt_3NKaPvG-gxnC3k0-vmecgoeCY36dPlj6X6QqMW6aovwFh67RnA</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Vetterlein, Malte W</creator><creator>Seisen, Thomas</creator><creator>May, Matthias</creator><creator>Nuhn, Philipp</creator><creator>Gierth, Michael</creator><creator>Mayr, Roman</creator><creator>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creator><creator>Burger, Maximilian</creator><creator>Novotny, Vladimir</creator><creator>Froehner, Michael</creator><creator>Wirth, Manfred P</creator><creator>Protzel, Chris</creator><creator>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creator><creator>Roghmann, Florian</creator><creator>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creator><creator>Noldus, Joachim</creator><creator>Pycha, Armin</creator><creator>Bastian, Patrick J</creator><creator>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creator><creator>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creator><creator>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creator><creator>Rink, Michael</creator><creator>Chun, Felix K.-H</creator><creator>Dahlem, Roland</creator><creator>Fisch, Margit</creator><creator>Aziz, Atiqullah</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</title><author>Vetterlein, Malte W ; Seisen, Thomas ; May, Matthias ; Nuhn, Philipp ; Gierth, Michael ; Mayr, Roman ; Fritsche, Hans-Martin ; Burger, Maximilian ; Novotny, Vladimir ; Froehner, Michael ; Wirth, Manfred P ; Protzel, Chris ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Roghmann, Florian ; Palisaar, Rein-Jüri ; Noldus, Joachim ; Pycha, Armin ; Bastian, Patrick J ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien ; Xylinas, Evanguelos ; Shariat, Shahrokh F ; Rink, Michael ; Chun, Felix K.-H ; Dahlem, Roland ; Fisch, Margit ; Aziz, Atiqullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cystectomy</topic><topic>Cystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cytotoxins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</topic><topic>Propensity score</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary bladder neoplasms</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seisen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhn, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierth, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehner, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Manfred P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protzel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roghmann, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pycha, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastian, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xylinas, Evanguelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shariat, Shahrokh F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rink, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlem, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Margit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Atiqullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vetterlein, Malte W</au><au>Seisen, Thomas</au><au>May, Matthias</au><au>Nuhn, Philipp</au><au>Gierth, Michael</au><au>Mayr, Roman</au><au>Fritsche, Hans-Martin</au><au>Burger, Maximilian</au><au>Novotny, Vladimir</au><au>Froehner, Michael</au><au>Wirth, Manfred P</au><au>Protzel, Chris</au><au>Hakenberg, Oliver W</au><au>Roghmann, Florian</au><au>Palisaar, Rein-Jüri</au><au>Noldus, Joachim</au><au>Pycha, Armin</au><au>Bastian, Patrick J</au><au>Trinh, Quoc-Dien</au><au>Xylinas, Evanguelos</au><au>Shariat, Shahrokh F</au><au>Rink, Michael</au><au>Chun, Felix K.-H</au><au>Dahlem, Roland</au><au>Fisch, Margit</au><au>Aziz, Atiqullah</au><aucorp>for the PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>PROMETRICS 2011 Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis</atitle><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>252-259</pages><issn>2405-4569</issn><eissn>2405-4569</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial. Objective To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice. Design, setting, and participants By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node–positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011. Intervention AC versus observation after RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)–adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation. Results and limitations Overall, 224 patients who received AC ( n = 84) versus observation ( n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively ( p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14–1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design. Conclusions We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations. Patient summary Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node–positive bladder cancer.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28753775</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-4569
ispartof European urology focus, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.252-259
issn 2405-4569
2405-4569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924599046
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adjuvant chemotherapy
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Cystectomy
Cystectomy - methods
Cytotoxins - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy
Propensity score
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Survival
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder - pathology
Urinary Bladder - surgery
Urinary bladder neoplasms
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - drug therapy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - pathology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urology
title Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node–Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score–Weighted Competing Risks Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Adjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20After%20Radical%20Cystectomy%20for%20Locally%20Advanced%20and/or%20Pelvic%20Lymph%20Node%E2%80%93Positive%20Muscle-invasive%20Urothelial%20Carcinoma%20of%20the%20Bladder:%20A%20Propensity%20Score%E2%80%93Weighted%20Competing%20Risks%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20focus&rft.au=Vetterlein,%20Malte%20W&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20PROMETRICS%202011%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=252-259&rft.issn=2405-4569&rft.eissn=2405-4569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924599046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-5fe50536b13344b99e672c65efd40d68521493ae7f4e0f9d8d4c0c1bbbf89d003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924599046&rft_id=info:pmid/28753775&rfr_iscdi=true