Evaluation of chemical spraying and environmental management efficacy in areas with minor previous application of integrated control actions for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil

• Published in: Acta tropica 2017-12, Vol.176, p.109-113
• Main Authors: Lara-Silva, Fabiana de Oliveira, Michalsky, Érika Monteiro, Fortes-Dias, Consuelo Latorre, Fiuza, Vanessa de Oliveira Pires, Dias, Edelberto Santos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Brazil - epidemiology; Chemical spraying; Cities; Environment; Environmental management; Humans; Insect Vectors - drug effects; Insecticides - pharmacology; Leishmaniases control; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - epidemiology; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention & control; Lutzomyia longipalpis; Population Density; Psychodidae - drug effects; Visceral leishmaniasis
• ISSN: 0001-706X; 1873-6254
• DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.07.029

[Display omitted] •Chemical spraying and environmental management were applied as vector control actions in area with no human cases of VL.•The areas were not previously submitted to integrated control actions for VL due to the absence of human cases.•The overall population density of the main VL vector (L. longipalpis) was reduced in the areas under control.•Chemical spraying showed a tendency to reduce the population density of L. longipalpis with no statistical significance.•Enviromental management was effective to reduce the population density of L. longipalpis with statistical significance. Leishmaniases are vector-borne diseases that are transmitted to humans through the bite of Leishmania-infected phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera:Psychodidae). The main proved vector of visceral leishmaniais (VL) in the New World – Lutzomyia longipalpis – is well-adapted to urban areas and has extensive distribution within the five geographical regions of Brazil. Integrated public health actions directed for the vector, domestic reservoir and humans for the control of VL are preferentially applied in municipalities with higher epidemiological risk of transmission. In this study, we evaluated the individual impact of two main vector control actions – chemical spraying and environmental management – in two districts with no reported cases of human VL. Although belonging to an endemic municipality for VL in Brazil, the integrated control actions have not been applied in these districts due to the absence of human cases. The number of L. longipalpis captured in a two-year period was used as indicator of the population density of the vector. After chemical spraying a tendency of reduction in L. longipalpis was observed but with no statistical significance compared to the control. Environmental management was effective in that reduction and it may help in the control of VL by reducing the population density of the vector in a preventive and more permanent action, perhaps associated with chemical spraying.