Loading…

Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions

Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Sub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hippocampus 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238
Main Authors: Pajkert, Anna, Finke, Carsten, Shing, Yee Lee, Hoffmann, Martina, Sommer, Werner, Heekeren, Hauke R., Ploner, Christoph J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3
container_end_page 1238
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1230
container_title Hippocampus
container_volume 27
creator Pajkert, Anna
Finke, Carsten
Shing, Yee Lee
Hoffmann, Martina
Sommer, Werner
Heekeren, Hauke R.
Ploner, Christoph J.
description Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hipo.22766
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925892361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1966798244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6MyfJmmOMtQNlHnQc8jSxHW0TU1axr69mZ0ePHh6n8OPh5cHgEsEpwhCfLcuWzfFmDN2BMYIijxFkJHjfaYwFYygETgLYQMhQhTCUzDCOWc5pHwM6Iupnd8lZdOZD6-60jUxJ-u-Vk1ItmW3TmJ967SqW1UllQlRhHNwYlUVzMXhTsD748PbbJ4-L58Ws_vnVBNBWMpWjHNlNSXGsswwA22mSWY5NawwAmqt0EphFE9GhCpWGhJLbG4LRQuuNJmAm6G39e6zN6GTdRm0qSrVGNcHiQSmucCEoUiv_9CN630Tv4uKMS5ynGVR3Q5KexeCN1a2vqyV30kE5X5MuR9Tfo8Z8dWhsl_VpvilP-tFgAawLSuz-6dKzhevy6H0C70Kf3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966798244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-9631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28768057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Association Learning ; Brain Neoplasms - psychology ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Clinical trials ; decision making ; encoding ; Female ; Hippocampus ; Hippocampus - injuries ; Hippocampus - surgery ; Humans ; Integration ; Learning ; Male ; Memory ; Memory Disorders ; memory integration ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Patients ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Prefrontal cortex ; relational inference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hippocampus, 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Yee Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><title>Hippocampus</title><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><description>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>encoding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Hippocampus - injuries</subject><subject>Hippocampus - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders</subject><subject>memory integration</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>relational inference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1050-9631</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6MyfJmmOMtQNlHnQc8jSxHW0TU1axr69mZ0ePHh6n8OPh5cHgEsEpwhCfLcuWzfFmDN2BMYIijxFkJHjfaYwFYygETgLYQMhQhTCUzDCOWc5pHwM6Iupnd8lZdOZD6-60jUxJ-u-Vk1ItmW3TmJ967SqW1UllQlRhHNwYlUVzMXhTsD748PbbJ4-L58Ws_vnVBNBWMpWjHNlNSXGsswwA22mSWY5NawwAmqt0EphFE9GhCpWGhJLbG4LRQuuNJmAm6G39e6zN6GTdRm0qSrVGNcHiQSmucCEoUiv_9CN630Tv4uKMS5ynGVR3Q5KexeCN1a2vqyV30kE5X5MuR9Tfo8Z8dWhsl_VpvilP-tFgAawLSuz-6dKzhevy6H0C70Kf3A</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Pajkert, Anna</creator><creator>Finke, Carsten</creator><creator>Shing, Yee Lee</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Martina</creator><creator>Sommer, Werner</creator><creator>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creator><creator>Ploner, Christoph J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><author>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>encoding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Hippocampus - injuries</topic><topic>Hippocampus - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders</topic><topic>memory integration</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>relational inference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Yee Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pajkert, Anna</au><au>Finke, Carsten</au><au>Shing, Yee Lee</au><au>Hoffmann, Martina</au><au>Sommer, Werner</au><au>Heekeren, Hauke R.</au><au>Ploner, Christoph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</atitle><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1230</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1230-1238</pages><issn>1050-9631</issn><eissn>1098-1063</eissn><abstract>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28768057</pmid><doi>10.1002/hipo.22766</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-9631
ispartof Hippocampus, 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238
issn 1050-9631
1098-1063
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925892361
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Association Learning
Brain Neoplasms - psychology
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Clinical trials
decision making
encoding
Female
Hippocampus
Hippocampus - injuries
Hippocampus - surgery
Humans
Integration
Learning
Male
Memory
Memory Disorders
memory integration
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Patients
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Prefrontal cortex
relational inference
Young Adult
title Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A47%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory%20integration%20in%20humans%20with%20hippocampal%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Hippocampus&rft.au=Pajkert,%20Anna&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1230&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1230-1238&rft.issn=1050-9631&rft.eissn=1098-1063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hipo.22766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966798244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966798244&rft_id=info:pmid/28768057&rfr_iscdi=true