Loading…
Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions
Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Sub...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hippocampus 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3 |
container_end_page | 1238 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1230 |
container_title | Hippocampus |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Pajkert, Anna Finke, Carsten Shing, Yee Lee Hoffmann, Martina Sommer, Werner Heekeren, Hauke R. Ploner, Christoph J. |
description | Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hipo.22766 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925892361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1966798244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6MyfJmmOMtQNlHnQc8jSxHW0TU1axr69mZ0ePHh6n8OPh5cHgEsEpwhCfLcuWzfFmDN2BMYIijxFkJHjfaYwFYygETgLYQMhQhTCUzDCOWc5pHwM6Iupnd8lZdOZD6-60jUxJ-u-Vk1ItmW3TmJ967SqW1UllQlRhHNwYlUVzMXhTsD748PbbJ4-L58Ws_vnVBNBWMpWjHNlNSXGsswwA22mSWY5NawwAmqt0EphFE9GhCpWGhJLbG4LRQuuNJmAm6G39e6zN6GTdRm0qSrVGNcHiQSmucCEoUiv_9CN630Tv4uKMS5ynGVR3Q5KexeCN1a2vqyV30kE5X5MuR9Tfo8Z8dWhsl_VpvilP-tFgAawLSuz-6dKzhevy6H0C70Kf3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966798244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-9631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28768057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Association Learning ; Brain Neoplasms - psychology ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Clinical trials ; decision making ; encoding ; Female ; Hippocampus ; Hippocampus - injuries ; Hippocampus - surgery ; Humans ; Integration ; Learning ; Male ; Memory ; Memory Disorders ; memory integration ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Patients ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Prefrontal cortex ; relational inference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hippocampus, 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Yee Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><title>Hippocampus</title><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><description>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>encoding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Hippocampus - injuries</subject><subject>Hippocampus - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders</subject><subject>memory integration</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>relational inference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1050-9631</issn><issn>1098-1063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6MyfJmmOMtQNlHnQc8jSxHW0TU1axr69mZ0ePHh6n8OPh5cHgEsEpwhCfLcuWzfFmDN2BMYIijxFkJHjfaYwFYygETgLYQMhQhTCUzDCOWc5pHwM6Iupnd8lZdOZD6-60jUxJ-u-Vk1ItmW3TmJ967SqW1UllQlRhHNwYlUVzMXhTsD748PbbJ4-L58Ws_vnVBNBWMpWjHNlNSXGsswwA22mSWY5NawwAmqt0EphFE9GhCpWGhJLbG4LRQuuNJmAm6G39e6zN6GTdRm0qSrVGNcHiQSmucCEoUiv_9CN630Tv4uKMS5ynGVR3Q5KexeCN1a2vqyV30kE5X5MuR9Tfo8Z8dWhsl_VpvilP-tFgAawLSuz-6dKzhevy6H0C70Kf3A</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Pajkert, Anna</creator><creator>Finke, Carsten</creator><creator>Shing, Yee Lee</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Martina</creator><creator>Sommer, Werner</creator><creator>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creator><creator>Ploner, Christoph J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</title><author>Pajkert, Anna ; Finke, Carsten ; Shing, Yee Lee ; Hoffmann, Martina ; Sommer, Werner ; Heekeren, Hauke R. ; Ploner, Christoph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>encoding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Hippocampus - injuries</topic><topic>Hippocampus - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders</topic><topic>memory integration</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>relational inference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pajkert, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Yee Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heekeren, Hauke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploner, Christoph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pajkert, Anna</au><au>Finke, Carsten</au><au>Shing, Yee Lee</au><au>Hoffmann, Martina</au><au>Sommer, Werner</au><au>Heekeren, Hauke R.</au><au>Ploner, Christoph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions</atitle><jtitle>Hippocampus</jtitle><addtitle>Hippocampus</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1230</spage><epage>1238</epage><pages>1230-1238</pages><issn>1050-9631</issn><eissn>1098-1063</eissn><abstract>Adaptive behavior frequently depends on inference from past experience. Recent studies suggest that the underlying process of integrating related memories may depend on interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Here, we investigated how hippocampal damage affects memory integration. Subjects with mediotemporal lesions and healthy controls learned a set of overlapping AB‐ and BC‐associations (object‐face‐ and face‐object pairs) and were then tested for memory of these associations (“direct” trials) and of inferential AC‐associations (“indirect” trials). The experiment consisted of four encoding/retrieval cycles. In direct trials, performance of patients and controls was similar and stable across cycles. By contrast, in indirect trials, patients and controls showed distinct patterns of behavior. Whereas patients and controls initially showed only minor differences, controls increased performance across subsequent cycles, while patient performance decreased to chance level. Further analysis suggested that this deficit was not merely a consequence of impaired associative memory but rather resulted from an additional hippocampal contribution to memory integration. Our findings further suggest that contextual factors modulate this contribution. Patient deficits in more complex memory‐guided behavior may depend on the flexible interaction of hippocampus‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms of memory integration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28768057</pmid><doi>10.1002/hipo.22766</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-4530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-9631 |
ispartof | Hippocampus, 2017-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1230-1238 |
issn | 1050-9631 1098-1063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925892361 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adult Association Learning Brain Neoplasms - psychology Brain Neoplasms - surgery Clinical trials decision making encoding Female Hippocampus Hippocampus - injuries Hippocampus - surgery Humans Integration Learning Male Memory Memory Disorders memory integration Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests Patients Pattern Recognition, Visual Prefrontal cortex relational inference Young Adult |
title | Memory integration in humans with hippocampal lesions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A47%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Memory%20integration%20in%20humans%20with%20hippocampal%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Hippocampus&rft.au=Pajkert,%20Anna&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1230&rft.epage=1238&rft.pages=1230-1238&rft.issn=1050-9631&rft.eissn=1098-1063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hipo.22766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966798244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-6b677afc53ef64e6e0f4c34f75e6de90cca1ba21ca1439adbc03f3f8fda5d7ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966798244&rft_id=info:pmid/28768057&rfr_iscdi=true |