Assimilation of carbon and nitrogen from pollen and nectar by a predaceous larva and its effects on growth and development

• Published in: Ecological entomology 2003-12, Vol.28 (6), p.717-728
• Main Authors: Patt, Joseph M., Wainright, Sam C., Hamilton, George C., Whittinghill, Dexter, Bosley, Keith, Dietrick, Jan, Lashomb, James H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 13C; 15N; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Animals; Assimilation; Autoecology; biocontrol; Biological and medical sciences; Chrysoperla carnea; Chrysoperla pallida; Chrysopidae; food webs; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; inter-cropping; larva; metamorphosis; nutrients; omnivory; pollen; predator; Protozoa. Invertebrata; stable isotope; tritrophic interaction
• ISSN: 0307-6946; 1365-2311
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2003.00556.x

.  1. Predaceous insects may benefit from feeding on non‐prey foods, such as pollen, nectar, and honeydew, because they can provide nutrients that help maintain metabolism and enhance overall nutrient intake. Yet, the extent to which predaceous insects can assimilate non‐prey food and the importance of diet mixing during particular life history stages is poorly understood. In this study the relative contribution of an omnivorous diet to the growth and survivorship of a predaceous larva was tested in a hypothetical situation in which nutritionally optimal prey was not available. The study system comprised a predaceous larva (second‐ and third‐instar larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea), nutritionally poor prey (larvae of Drosophila melanogaster), and non‐prey food (pollen suspension, a mixture of bee pollen and artificial nectar (1 M sucrose solution)). Chrysoperla carnea larvae in the mixed diet treatment were provided with both Drosophila larvae and pollen suspension, while those reared on the prey and non‐prey diet treatments received only Drosophila larvae or pollen suspension respectively. 2. The inclusion of pollen and sucrose in their diet enhanced the growth of C. carnea larvae. Second instars reared on the mixed diet developed significantly faster than their cohorts reared on the prey diet, however third instars reared on the mixed diet did not develop faster than their cohorts reared on the prey diet. Larvae reared on the mixed diet became larger adults than did those reared on either the prey or non‐prey diets. Third instars reared on the non‐prey diet completed their development while second instars in the non‐prey diet treatment failed to pupate. 3. Stable isotope analysis indicated that the larvae obtained most of their carbon (55–73%) and nitrogen (71–73%) from Drosophila but acquired only a minor amount of carbon (2–5%) and nitrogen (3–11%) from pollen. Larvae reared on the mixed and non‐prey diets acquired a relatively significant amount of carbon (23–51%) from sucrose. 4. A model, which included a novel fractionation factor to account for the isotopic effect of metamorphosis, was developed to explain the proportion of larval growth attributable to each diet item. It explained the adult δ13C values to within 0.2‰ and adult δ15N values to within 0.7‰ in all treatments. 5. Adults fed 15N‐labelled pollen as larvae retained the 15N signal of the pollen as adults. 6. The collective results of this study support the view that, despite