Publication Bias and Stereotype Threat Research: A Reply to Zigerell

Zigerell (2017) demonstrated that 4 methods of examining publication bias applied to the meta-analysis presented by Nguyen and Ryan (2008) on stereotype threat effects yield highly divergent conclusions. The methods differ in the estimated magnitudes of publication bias and of the stereotype threat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2017-08, Vol.102 (8), p.1169-1177
Main Authors: Ryan, Ann Marie, Nguyen, Hannah-Hanh D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Cross Cultural Differences
Human Sex Differences
Humans
Meta Analysis
Moderators
Occupational psychology
Publication Bias
Racial and Ethnic Differences
Stereotyped Attitudes
Stereotypes
Stereotyping
Systematic review
Threat
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Zigerell (2017) demonstrated that 4 methods of examining publication bias applied to the meta-analysis presented by Nguyen and Ryan (2008) on stereotype threat effects yield highly divergent conclusions. The methods differ in the estimated magnitudes of publication bias and of the stereotype threat effect. Zigerell (2017), Nguyen and Ryan (2008), and the current article all strongly urge researchers to pay attention to moderators of stereotype threat effects, and we provide commentary on the state of this research focus.
ISSN:0021-9010
1939-1854
DOI:10.1037/apl0000242