Loading…
Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3 |
container_end_page | 450 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 442 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Falagas, Matthew E. Avgeri, Sofia G. Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. Dimopoulos, George Siempos, Ilias I. |
description | Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/dkn201 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19280524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jac/dkn201</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1575865391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_AgFnuevvgHSBD0QVibbH7sbt-02p5QUbCC-BJms7NerrubM8lK-9837R0t-ODTwOTDTJgvIS84e8dZI442YI-6y6lk_BFZcKlZUbKGPyYLJpgqKqnEIXka44YxppWun5BDXktdCSYWZPi-9iEV9C-GOEc6-Ol30c0BkvMThSm50dngWwcDTQEhjTgl2vtA8QoshvYORup7atfBT87SNhe7dsnFYwp0xAQFTDBcRxefkYMehojP93VJfpx-ujhZFedfzz6fvD8vrJIiFYrJUiul0bZ1g7IWlRBKWYkKdNNVXce1xMrWvQbBQZa3vfwMCLVtoEexJG92c7fB_5kxJjO6aHEYYEI_R8ObsmaqlBm--gdu_Bzyb6MpeaU1Y_l4S_J2h_IhYgzYm21wI4Rrw5m5DcDkAMwugIxf7ifO7YjdA91fPIPXewDRwtAHmKyL965kWqiyUg_Oz9v_Lyx2zsWEV_cSwqXJCytlVj9_mW8f5ClfXXw0X8QNZKertA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217660045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18467303</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Antibiotics ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchitis ; Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy ; Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology ; Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology ; Cefixime - administration & dosage ; Cefixime - adverse effects ; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; Clarithromycin - administration & dosage ; Clarithromycin - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; Drug dosages ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; macrolides ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pneumology ; quinolones ; Quinolones - administration & dosage ; Quinolones - adverse effects ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Streptococcus pneumoniae ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; β-lactams</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20635275$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18467303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchitis</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cefixime - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cefixime - adverse effects</subject><subject>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>Clarithromycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Clarithromycin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>macrolides</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>quinolones</subject><subject>Quinolones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Quinolones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>β-lactams</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_AgFnuevvgHSBD0QVibbH7sbt-02p5QUbCC-BJms7NerrubM8lK-9837R0t-ODTwOTDTJgvIS84e8dZI442YI-6y6lk_BFZcKlZUbKGPyYLJpgqKqnEIXka44YxppWun5BDXktdCSYWZPi-9iEV9C-GOEc6-Ol30c0BkvMThSm50dngWwcDTQEhjTgl2vtA8QoshvYORup7atfBT87SNhe7dsnFYwp0xAQFTDBcRxefkYMehojP93VJfpx-ujhZFedfzz6fvD8vrJIiFYrJUiul0bZ1g7IWlRBKWYkKdNNVXce1xMrWvQbBQZa3vfwMCLVtoEexJG92c7fB_5kxJjO6aHEYYEI_R8ObsmaqlBm--gdu_Bzyb6MpeaU1Y_l4S_J2h_IhYgzYm21wI4Rrw5m5DcDkAMwugIxf7ifO7YjdA91fPIPXewDRwtAHmKyL965kWqiyUg_Oz9v_Lyx2zsWEV_cSwqXJCytlVj9_mW8f5ClfXXw0X8QNZKertA</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Falagas, Matthew E.</creator><creator>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creator><creator>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creator><creator>Dimopoulos, George</creator><creator>Siempos, Ilias I.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><author>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchitis</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cefixime - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cefixime - adverse effects</topic><topic>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>Clarithromycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Clarithromycin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>macrolides</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>quinolones</topic><topic>Quinolones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Quinolones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>β-lactams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falagas, Matthew E.</au><au>Avgeri, Sofia G.</au><au>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</au><au>Dimopoulos, George</au><au>Siempos, Ilias I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>442-450</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18467303</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkn201</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19280524 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects Antibiotics Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Bacterial diseases Biological and medical sciences Bronchitis Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology Cefixime - administration & dosage Cefixime - adverse effects chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma Clarithromycin - administration & dosage Clarithromycin - adverse effects Clinical trials Drug dosages Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases macrolides Medical sciences Meta-analysis Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pneumology quinolones Quinolones - administration & dosage Quinolones - adverse effects Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections Streptococcus pneumoniae Time Factors Treatment Outcome β-lactams |
title | Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-%20versus%20long-duration%20antimicrobial%20treatment%20for%20exacerbations%20of%20chronic%20bronchitis:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Falagas,%20Matthew%20E.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=442-450&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkn201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1575865391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217660045&rft_id=info:pmid/18467303&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jac/dkn201&rfr_iscdi=true |