Loading…

Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450
Main Authors: Falagas, Matthew E., Avgeri, Sofia G., Matthaiou, Dimitrios K., Dimopoulos, George, Siempos, Ilias I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3
container_end_page 450
container_issue 3
container_start_page 442
container_title Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
container_volume 62
creator Falagas, Matthew E.
Avgeri, Sofia G.
Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.
Dimopoulos, George
Siempos, Ilias I.
description Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jac/dkn201
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19280524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jac/dkn201</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1575865391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_AgFnuevvgHSBD0QVibbH7sbt-02p5QUbCC-BJms7NerrubM8lK-9837R0t-ODTwOTDTJgvIS84e8dZI442YI-6y6lk_BFZcKlZUbKGPyYLJpgqKqnEIXka44YxppWun5BDXktdCSYWZPi-9iEV9C-GOEc6-Ol30c0BkvMThSm50dngWwcDTQEhjTgl2vtA8QoshvYORup7atfBT87SNhe7dsnFYwp0xAQFTDBcRxefkYMehojP93VJfpx-ujhZFedfzz6fvD8vrJIiFYrJUiul0bZ1g7IWlRBKWYkKdNNVXce1xMrWvQbBQZa3vfwMCLVtoEexJG92c7fB_5kxJjO6aHEYYEI_R8ObsmaqlBm--gdu_Bzyb6MpeaU1Y_l4S_J2h_IhYgzYm21wI4Rrw5m5DcDkAMwugIxf7ifO7YjdA91fPIPXewDRwtAHmKyL965kWqiyUg_Oz9v_Lyx2zsWEV_cSwqXJCytlVj9_mW8f5ClfXXw0X8QNZKertA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217660045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18467303</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Antibiotics ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchitis ; Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy ; Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology ; Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology ; Cefixime - administration &amp; dosage ; Cefixime - adverse effects ; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; Clarithromycin - administration &amp; dosage ; Clarithromycin - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; Drug dosages ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; macrolides ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pneumology ; quinolones ; Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage ; Quinolones - adverse effects ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Streptococcus pneumoniae ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; β-lactams</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20635275$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18467303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchitis</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology</subject><subject>Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cefixime - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cefixime - adverse effects</subject><subject>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>Clarithromycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Clarithromycin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>macrolides</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>quinolones</subject><subject>Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Quinolones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>β-lactams</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_AgFnuevvgHSBD0QVibbH7sbt-02p5QUbCC-BJms7NerrubM8lK-9837R0t-ODTwOTDTJgvIS84e8dZI442YI-6y6lk_BFZcKlZUbKGPyYLJpgqKqnEIXka44YxppWun5BDXktdCSYWZPi-9iEV9C-GOEc6-Ol30c0BkvMThSm50dngWwcDTQEhjTgl2vtA8QoshvYORup7atfBT87SNhe7dsnFYwp0xAQFTDBcRxefkYMehojP93VJfpx-ujhZFedfzz6fvD8vrJIiFYrJUiul0bZ1g7IWlRBKWYkKdNNVXce1xMrWvQbBQZa3vfwMCLVtoEexJG92c7fB_5kxJjO6aHEYYEI_R8ObsmaqlBm--gdu_Bzyb6MpeaU1Y_l4S_J2h_IhYgzYm21wI4Rrw5m5DcDkAMwugIxf7ifO7YjdA91fPIPXewDRwtAHmKyL965kWqiyUg_Oz9v_Lyx2zsWEV_cSwqXJCytlVj9_mW8f5ClfXXw0X8QNZKertA</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Falagas, Matthew E.</creator><creator>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creator><creator>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creator><creator>Dimopoulos, George</creator><creator>Siempos, Ilias I.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</title><author>Falagas, Matthew E. ; Avgeri, Sofia G. ; Matthaiou, Dimitrios K. ; Dimopoulos, George ; Siempos, Ilias I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchitis</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology</topic><topic>Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cefixime - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cefixime - adverse effects</topic><topic>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>Clarithromycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Clarithromycin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>macrolides</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>quinolones</topic><topic>Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Quinolones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>β-lactams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falagas, Matthew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avgeri, Sofia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimopoulos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siempos, Ilias I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falagas, Matthew E.</au><au>Avgeri, Sofia G.</au><au>Matthaiou, Dimitrios K.</au><au>Dimopoulos, George</au><au>Siempos, Ilias I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>442-450</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of short (5 days) and long (7 or 10 days) duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing regimens of the same antibiotic (same dosage and same route of administration) administered for a different time period. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists from publications, with no language restrictions. Results Of the 1031 reports retrieved initially, seven RCTs, enrolling 3083 patients with AECB, met our inclusion criteria. The antimicrobials studied in these seven RCTs were quinolones, cefixime and clarithromycin. There was no difference between the short- and long-duration therapies with regard to treatment success in intention-to-treat [relative risk (RR) = 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.03], clinically evaluable (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02) or microbiologically evaluable (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93–1.02) patients. Short-duration treatment, when compared with long, was associated with fewer adverse events (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97). Conclusions Short-duration treatment seems to be as effective as and safer than long-duration antimicrobial treatment of patients with AECB. Additional research is required to clarify the long-term outcomes (namely the exacerbation-free interval after the resolution of an initial episode) of the compared regimens.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18467303</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkn201</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7453
ispartof Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2008-09, Vol.62 (3), p.442-450
issn 0305-7453
1460-2091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19280524
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
Antibiotics
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchitis
Bronchitis, Chronic - drug therapy
Bronchitis, Chronic - microbiology
Bronchitis, Chronic - physiopathology
Cefixime - administration & dosage
Cefixime - adverse effects
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma
Clarithromycin - administration & dosage
Clarithromycin - adverse effects
Clinical trials
Drug dosages
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
macrolides
Medical sciences
Meta-analysis
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pneumology
quinolones
Quinolones - administration & dosage
Quinolones - adverse effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
β-lactams
title Short- versus long-duration antimicrobial treatment for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-%20versus%20long-duration%20antimicrobial%20treatment%20for%20exacerbations%20of%20chronic%20bronchitis:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Falagas,%20Matthew%20E.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=442-450&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkn201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1575865391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-50426556ecb89e48373355c4e5a69d7dd164e7c8f6a31a429d7d5c4aea8c9afe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217660045&rft_id=info:pmid/18467303&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jac/dkn201&rfr_iscdi=true