Loading…

Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy

Aim To comparatively evaluate the outcomes of professionally administered plaque removal (PAPR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment for experimentally induced gingivitis (G) and peri‐implant mucositis (p‐iM). Materials and methods Twenty systemically healthy patients, each contributing a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of dental hygiene 2018-05, Vol.16 (2), p.e58-e64
Main Authors: Zeza, B, Farina, R, Pilloni, A, Mongardini, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643
container_end_page e64
container_issue 2
container_start_page e58
container_title International journal of dental hygiene
container_volume 16
creator Zeza, B
Farina, R
Pilloni, A
Mongardini, C
description Aim To comparatively evaluate the outcomes of professionally administered plaque removal (PAPR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment for experimentally induced gingivitis (G) and peri‐implant mucositis (p‐iM). Materials and methods Twenty systemically healthy patients, each contributing a single implant‐supported unit in a posterior sextant and a tooth within the same quadrant, were selected. Patients underwent an experimental G and p‐iM trial consisting of a 2‐week period of undisturbed plaque accumulation and a 6‐week resolution phase following treatment administration. Supragingival plaque levels, probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at experimental tooth and implant either before or 2 and 6 weeks after administration of PAPR+PDT. Results The results of the study indicate that (i) treatment with PAPR and PDT resulted in a significant reduction in the median number of BoP+ sites from 1 to 0 around teeth (P=.01) and from 3.5 to 2.0 around implants (P=.03), with the treatment effect being affected by initial PD; (ii) implants showed a significantly higher number of residual BoP+ sites following treatment, and the difference between implants and teeth was particularly pronounced (implants: 42%; teeth: 22%) at shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci as observed at 6 weeks following treatment. Conclusions G and p‐iM can be effectively treated with PAPR+PDT. At shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci, implants may show a higher number of residual bleeding sites when compared to teeth, and the number of residual bleeding sites following PAPR+PDT increases with increasing PD around either teeth or implants.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/idh.12302
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928505276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2025901320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhq0oUSAkCy6ALLFJFgN-dPeMl2ggAQkpm2RteewyY2S3G9sN9C5H4AA5XU4SzwxhgRR74ZLq81-PH6FDSk5oPafOrE8o44S9Qfu0I3TWEj5_-xIzsYc-5HxLCKu3fY_22GIuBONsH_1eetc7rTyOY9ExQMbRYngcILkAfamJG9ffuHtXXMaqN3iT-fPryYXBq77gMOqYt8mSQJXNH_zgyhoPKVrI2cVeeT9hZUItlAskqBpe3Y2AE4R4XytsZdexRDP1KjiNyxqSGqaP6J1VPsOn5_cA_fx68WN5Obv-_u1qeXY907zlbNaKlnMGgjYGBLOiU3ZhupUxQFcLzcDYhiitjaWaG84bq5VWQlnVmE7TruEH6PNOt_Zc-8pFBpc1-DogxDFLKtiiJS2bdxU9foXexjHVEbOsy20FoZyRSn3ZUTrFnBNYOdR1qjRJSuTGMlktk1vLKnv0rDiuApgX8p9HFTjdAQ_Ow_R_JXl1frmT_AuTlKa3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2025901320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zeza, B ; Farina, R ; Pilloni, A ; Mongardini, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeza, B ; Farina, R ; Pilloni, A ; Mongardini, C</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To comparatively evaluate the outcomes of professionally administered plaque removal (PAPR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment for experimentally induced gingivitis (G) and peri‐implant mucositis (p‐iM). Materials and methods Twenty systemically healthy patients, each contributing a single implant‐supported unit in a posterior sextant and a tooth within the same quadrant, were selected. Patients underwent an experimental G and p‐iM trial consisting of a 2‐week period of undisturbed plaque accumulation and a 6‐week resolution phase following treatment administration. Supragingival plaque levels, probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at experimental tooth and implant either before or 2 and 6 weeks after administration of PAPR+PDT. Results The results of the study indicate that (i) treatment with PAPR and PDT resulted in a significant reduction in the median number of BoP+ sites from 1 to 0 around teeth (P=.01) and from 3.5 to 2.0 around implants (P=.03), with the treatment effect being affected by initial PD; (ii) implants showed a significantly higher number of residual BoP+ sites following treatment, and the difference between implants and teeth was particularly pronounced (implants: 42%; teeth: 22%) at shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci as observed at 6 weeks following treatment. Conclusions G and p‐iM can be effectively treated with PAPR+PDT. At shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci, implants may show a higher number of residual bleeding sites when compared to teeth, and the number of residual bleeding sites following PAPR+PDT increases with increasing PD around either teeth or implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-5029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/idh.12302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28799232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bleeding ; Clinical outcomes ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; Gingivitis ; Mucositis ; Patients ; photochemotherapy ; Photodynamic therapy ; Teeth ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>International journal of dental hygiene, 2018-05, Vol.16 (2), p.e58-e64</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4845-6827</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28799232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeza, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilloni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardini, C</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy</title><title>International journal of dental hygiene</title><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><description>Aim To comparatively evaluate the outcomes of professionally administered plaque removal (PAPR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment for experimentally induced gingivitis (G) and peri‐implant mucositis (p‐iM). Materials and methods Twenty systemically healthy patients, each contributing a single implant‐supported unit in a posterior sextant and a tooth within the same quadrant, were selected. Patients underwent an experimental G and p‐iM trial consisting of a 2‐week period of undisturbed plaque accumulation and a 6‐week resolution phase following treatment administration. Supragingival plaque levels, probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at experimental tooth and implant either before or 2 and 6 weeks after administration of PAPR+PDT. Results The results of the study indicate that (i) treatment with PAPR and PDT resulted in a significant reduction in the median number of BoP+ sites from 1 to 0 around teeth (P=.01) and from 3.5 to 2.0 around implants (P=.03), with the treatment effect being affected by initial PD; (ii) implants showed a significantly higher number of residual BoP+ sites following treatment, and the difference between implants and teeth was particularly pronounced (implants: 42%; teeth: 22%) at shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci as observed at 6 weeks following treatment. Conclusions G and p‐iM can be effectively treated with PAPR+PDT. At shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci, implants may show a higher number of residual bleeding sites when compared to teeth, and the number of residual bleeding sites following PAPR+PDT increases with increasing PD around either teeth or implants.</description><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Gingivitis</subject><subject>Mucositis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>photochemotherapy</subject><subject>Photodynamic therapy</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1601-5029</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhq0oUSAkCy6ALLFJFgN-dPeMl2ggAQkpm2RteewyY2S3G9sN9C5H4AA5XU4SzwxhgRR74ZLq81-PH6FDSk5oPafOrE8o44S9Qfu0I3TWEj5_-xIzsYc-5HxLCKu3fY_22GIuBONsH_1eetc7rTyOY9ExQMbRYngcILkAfamJG9ffuHtXXMaqN3iT-fPryYXBq77gMOqYt8mSQJXNH_zgyhoPKVrI2cVeeT9hZUItlAskqBpe3Y2AE4R4XytsZdexRDP1KjiNyxqSGqaP6J1VPsOn5_cA_fx68WN5Obv-_u1qeXY907zlbNaKlnMGgjYGBLOiU3ZhupUxQFcLzcDYhiitjaWaG84bq5VWQlnVmE7TruEH6PNOt_Zc-8pFBpc1-DogxDFLKtiiJS2bdxU9foXexjHVEbOsy20FoZyRSn3ZUTrFnBNYOdR1qjRJSuTGMlktk1vLKnv0rDiuApgX8p9HFTjdAQ_Ow_R_JXl1frmT_AuTlKa3</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Zeza, B</creator><creator>Farina, R</creator><creator>Pilloni, A</creator><creator>Mongardini, C</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-6827</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy</title><author>Zeza, B ; Farina, R ; Pilloni, A ; Mongardini, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Gingivitis</topic><topic>Mucositis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>photochemotherapy</topic><topic>Photodynamic therapy</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeza, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilloni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongardini, C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeza, B</au><au>Farina, R</au><au>Pilloni, A</au><au>Mongardini, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e58</spage><epage>e64</epage><pages>e58-e64</pages><issn>1601-5029</issn><eissn>1601-5037</eissn><abstract>Aim To comparatively evaluate the outcomes of professionally administered plaque removal (PAPR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment for experimentally induced gingivitis (G) and peri‐implant mucositis (p‐iM). Materials and methods Twenty systemically healthy patients, each contributing a single implant‐supported unit in a posterior sextant and a tooth within the same quadrant, were selected. Patients underwent an experimental G and p‐iM trial consisting of a 2‐week period of undisturbed plaque accumulation and a 6‐week resolution phase following treatment administration. Supragingival plaque levels, probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at experimental tooth and implant either before or 2 and 6 weeks after administration of PAPR+PDT. Results The results of the study indicate that (i) treatment with PAPR and PDT resulted in a significant reduction in the median number of BoP+ sites from 1 to 0 around teeth (P=.01) and from 3.5 to 2.0 around implants (P=.03), with the treatment effect being affected by initial PD; (ii) implants showed a significantly higher number of residual BoP+ sites following treatment, and the difference between implants and teeth was particularly pronounced (implants: 42%; teeth: 22%) at shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci as observed at 6 weeks following treatment. Conclusions G and p‐iM can be effectively treated with PAPR+PDT. At shallow (1‐2 mm) sulci, implants may show a higher number of residual bleeding sites when compared to teeth, and the number of residual bleeding sites following PAPR+PDT increases with increasing PD around either teeth or implants.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28799232</pmid><doi>10.1111/idh.12302</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-6827</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1601-5029
ispartof International journal of dental hygiene, 2018-05, Vol.16 (2), p.e58-e64
issn 1601-5029
1601-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928505276
source Wiley
subjects Bleeding
Clinical outcomes
Dental implants
Dentistry
Gingivitis
Mucositis
Patients
photochemotherapy
Photodynamic therapy
Teeth
Transplants & implants
title Clinical outcomes of experimental gingivitis and peri‐implant mucositis treatment with professionally administered plaque removal and photodynamic therapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A04%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20experimental%20gingivitis%20and%20peri%E2%80%90implant%20mucositis%20treatment%20with%20professionally%20administered%20plaque%20removal%20and%20photodynamic%20therapy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dental%20hygiene&rft.au=Zeza,%20B&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e58&rft.epage=e64&rft.pages=e58-e64&rft.issn=1601-5029&rft.eissn=1601-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/idh.12302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2025901320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-595332e914de92f96af8d6bdde1b8c2edf40accdf1c3d334fcaca9afa4d6c1643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2025901320&rft_id=info:pmid/28799232&rfr_iscdi=true