Loading…

Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China

This article is a survey and critique of recent endeavours to establish statistical foundations for a chronology for the great divergence based upon trends and levels in relative wages. Our reading of the bibliography in Chinese labour history, together with a preliminary investigation into other pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Economic history review 2016-11, Vol.69 (4), p.1057-1082
Main Authors: Deng, Kent, O'Brien, Patrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53
container_end_page 1082
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1057
container_title The Economic history review
container_volume 69
creator Deng, Kent
O'Brien, Patrick
description This article is a survey and critique of recent endeavours to establish statistical foundations for a chronology for the great divergence based upon trends and levels in relative wages. Our reading of the bibliography in Chinese labour history, together with a preliminary investigation into other primary sources, suggests that the Kuznetsian paradigm for empirical economics may not be viable for the construction of analytical narratives for the Chinese and other premodern imperial economies in South and West Asia. Nevertheless, two datasets currently in print will continue to be quoted to lend support to numerically grounded speculations for levels and trends in real wages and welfare for the families of wage-dependent urban workers in China over the eighteenth century. Statistical evidence for the Ming and Qing dynasties calibrated for the purposes of comparing real wage levels for wage-dependent labour between China and western Europe can, however, be placed on a spectrum for accuracy and inferential analysis that runs from 'unfounded guess work' to 'plausible conjectures'. The unwelcome contention of this article is that the data published and potentially available for China (and probably for India and the Ottoman Empire) stand close to the unfounded guess work end of that spectrum. Meanwhile, and as a speculative conclusion, we offer a conjecture that the 'real wages' for Qing China's tiny proletariat, whose income included high proportions of wages in kind, have remained as elusive as they were when the real wage debate began a decade ago.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ehr.12281
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928773733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45183225</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45183225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1u1DAQhSMEEkvhgjewhJDoRVr_JLHDHVptf6QF1KoSl5bXmWS9uHGxky37bjxcJ6RUCAnf2Ja_MzPHJ8veMnrCcJ3CNp4wzhV7li1YUamcclU_zxaUMpFTxuTL7FVKO0ppiQ-L7NcqDWbjXdq6viN4HlwanDWetGHsG7yGPpHQEkPsNoY--NAd8C2SYQuki2AG0rg9xA56Cx8RS2Pcw4GYviE2usH9GGHST_hddLcmHkgKY7SQnspY7DHE0U7NJjaCx8Z7IPemA-JhD36GP-OQ-dU06RLnNa-zF63xCd487kfZzdnqZnmRr7-eXy4_rXNbVJzlilU1K8qWt4WqN1IpI4sNVYJaK0valJZVVEKjSiXbttoUjbCSSiVUawvblOIo-zCXvYsB3aRB37pkwXvTQxiTZjVXUgopBKLv_kF36LXH4TRTvC5oWUmK1PFM2RhSitDqx5_RjOopRo0x6t8xIns6s_fOw-H_oF5dXP9RvJ8VuzSE-LeCCyp1UTIlOJ9s5TOHicPPJ87E77pCN6X-9uVcX6urNVue1VqKB7NTvEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829405670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Deng, Kent ; O'Brien, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Deng, Kent ; O'Brien, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>This article is a survey and critique of recent endeavours to establish statistical foundations for a chronology for the great divergence based upon trends and levels in relative wages. Our reading of the bibliography in Chinese labour history, together with a preliminary investigation into other primary sources, suggests that the Kuznetsian paradigm for empirical economics may not be viable for the construction of analytical narratives for the Chinese and other premodern imperial economies in South and West Asia. Nevertheless, two datasets currently in print will continue to be quoted to lend support to numerically grounded speculations for levels and trends in real wages and welfare for the families of wage-dependent urban workers in China over the eighteenth century. Statistical evidence for the Ming and Qing dynasties calibrated for the purposes of comparing real wage levels for wage-dependent labour between China and western Europe can, however, be placed on a spectrum for accuracy and inferential analysis that runs from 'unfounded guess work' to 'plausible conjectures'. The unwelcome contention of this article is that the data published and potentially available for China (and probably for India and the Ottoman Empire) stand close to the unfounded guess work end of that spectrum. Meanwhile, and as a speculative conclusion, we offer a conjecture that the 'real wages' for Qing China's tiny proletariat, whose income included high proportions of wages in kind, have remained as elusive as they were when the real wage debate began a decade ago.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>18th century ; Economic history ; Economic trends ; Studies ; Trends ; Wages &amp; salaries</subject><ispartof>The Economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.69 (4), p.1057-1082</ispartof><rights>2016 Economic History Society</rights><rights>Economic History Society 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45183225$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45183225$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33849,33850,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deng, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China</title><title>The Economic history review</title><addtitle>The Economic History Review</addtitle><description>This article is a survey and critique of recent endeavours to establish statistical foundations for a chronology for the great divergence based upon trends and levels in relative wages. Our reading of the bibliography in Chinese labour history, together with a preliminary investigation into other primary sources, suggests that the Kuznetsian paradigm for empirical economics may not be viable for the construction of analytical narratives for the Chinese and other premodern imperial economies in South and West Asia. Nevertheless, two datasets currently in print will continue to be quoted to lend support to numerically grounded speculations for levels and trends in real wages and welfare for the families of wage-dependent urban workers in China over the eighteenth century. Statistical evidence for the Ming and Qing dynasties calibrated for the purposes of comparing real wage levels for wage-dependent labour between China and western Europe can, however, be placed on a spectrum for accuracy and inferential analysis that runs from 'unfounded guess work' to 'plausible conjectures'. The unwelcome contention of this article is that the data published and potentially available for China (and probably for India and the Ottoman Empire) stand close to the unfounded guess work end of that spectrum. Meanwhile, and as a speculative conclusion, we offer a conjecture that the 'real wages' for Qing China's tiny proletariat, whose income included high proportions of wages in kind, have remained as elusive as they were when the real wage debate began a decade ago.</description><subject>18th century</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Economic trends</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><issn>0013-0117</issn><issn>1468-0289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1u1DAQhSMEEkvhgjewhJDoRVr_JLHDHVptf6QF1KoSl5bXmWS9uHGxky37bjxcJ6RUCAnf2Ja_MzPHJ8veMnrCcJ3CNp4wzhV7li1YUamcclU_zxaUMpFTxuTL7FVKO0ppiQ-L7NcqDWbjXdq6viN4HlwanDWetGHsG7yGPpHQEkPsNoY--NAd8C2SYQuki2AG0rg9xA56Cx8RS2Pcw4GYviE2usH9GGHST_hddLcmHkgKY7SQnspY7DHE0U7NJjaCx8Z7IPemA-JhD36GP-OQ-dU06RLnNa-zF63xCd487kfZzdnqZnmRr7-eXy4_rXNbVJzlilU1K8qWt4WqN1IpI4sNVYJaK0valJZVVEKjSiXbttoUjbCSSiVUawvblOIo-zCXvYsB3aRB37pkwXvTQxiTZjVXUgopBKLv_kF36LXH4TRTvC5oWUmK1PFM2RhSitDqx5_RjOopRo0x6t8xIns6s_fOw-H_oF5dXP9RvJ8VuzSE-LeCCyp1UTIlOJ9s5TOHicPPJ87E77pCN6X-9uVcX6urNVue1VqKB7NTvEA</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Deng, Kent</creator><creator>O'Brien, Patrick</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China</title><author>Deng, Kent ; O'Brien, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>18th century</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Economic trends</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deng, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deng, Kent</au><au>O'Brien, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China</atitle><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle><addtitle>The Economic History Review</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1057</spage><epage>1082</epage><pages>1057-1082</pages><issn>0013-0117</issn><eissn>1468-0289</eissn><abstract>This article is a survey and critique of recent endeavours to establish statistical foundations for a chronology for the great divergence based upon trends and levels in relative wages. Our reading of the bibliography in Chinese labour history, together with a preliminary investigation into other primary sources, suggests that the Kuznetsian paradigm for empirical economics may not be viable for the construction of analytical narratives for the Chinese and other premodern imperial economies in South and West Asia. Nevertheless, two datasets currently in print will continue to be quoted to lend support to numerically grounded speculations for levels and trends in real wages and welfare for the families of wage-dependent urban workers in China over the eighteenth century. Statistical evidence for the Ming and Qing dynasties calibrated for the purposes of comparing real wage levels for wage-dependent labour between China and western Europe can, however, be placed on a spectrum for accuracy and inferential analysis that runs from 'unfounded guess work' to 'plausible conjectures'. The unwelcome contention of this article is that the data published and potentially available for China (and probably for India and the Ottoman Empire) stand close to the unfounded guess work end of that spectrum. Meanwhile, and as a speculative conclusion, we offer a conjecture that the 'real wages' for Qing China's tiny proletariat, whose income included high proportions of wages in kind, have remained as elusive as they were when the real wage debate began a decade ago.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ehr.12281</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0117
ispartof The Economic history review, 2016-11, Vol.69 (4), p.1057-1082
issn 0013-0117
1468-0289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928773733
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley; Humanities Index; JSTOR
subjects 18th century
Economic history
Economic trends
Studies
Trends
Wages & salaries
title Establishing statistical foundations of a chronology for the great divergence: a survey and critique of the primary sources for the construction of relative wage levels for Ming-Qing China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20statistical%20foundations%20of%20a%20chronology%20for%20the%20great%20divergence:%20a%20survey%20and%20critique%20of%20the%20primary%20sources%20for%20the%20construction%20of%20relative%20wage%20levels%20for%20Ming-Qing%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Deng,%20Kent&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1057&rft.epage=1082&rft.pages=1057-1082&rft.issn=0013-0117&rft.eissn=1468-0289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ehr.12281&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45183225%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-8169145f2f489b788a74b0830cc750d5c1607ed8587ff6b4d3c707838fc4cd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829405670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45183225&rfr_iscdi=true