Loading…

Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2

1. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of slaughter age and stunning method on the quality of turkey meat from poultry processing plants. 2. One hundred B.U.T. Premium turkeys were divided into 4 groups of 25 animals according to slaughter age (15 or 17 weeks) and CO 2 stunning pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British poultry science 2017-11, Vol.58 (6), p.656-663
Main Authors: Mauri, S., Guijarro, Á., Peña, F., Domenech, V., Avilés, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 663
container_issue 6
container_start_page 656
container_title British poultry science
container_volume 58
creator Mauri, S.
Guijarro, Á.
Peña, F.
Domenech, V.
Avilés, C.
description 1. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of slaughter age and stunning method on the quality of turkey meat from poultry processing plants. 2. One hundred B.U.T. Premium turkeys were divided into 4 groups of 25 animals according to slaughter age (15 or 17 weeks) and CO 2 stunning procedure (G1 stepwise: step1: 30% CO 2 , 15 s; step 2: 55% CO 2 , 40 s; step 3: 70% CO 2 , 45 s; G2: progressive increase of the CO 2 concentration at a rate of 0.8% per s for 100 s). The quality of the breast meat was determined in fillets taken at different post-mortem times. 3. There were differences between the stunning groups for several variables (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.02; a*: −1.84 ± 0.05 and −2.21 ± 0.04; b*: 4.99 ± 0.15 and 4.68 ± 0.16; drip loss: 0.85 ± 0.02 and 0.71 ± 0.02 for G1 and G2, respectively), while no significant differences were found for L*, cooking loss and texture analysed with a Warner Bratzler Shear Force cell (WBSF). 4. Slaughter age had a significant effect on all the parameters studied (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.01; a*: −2.21 ± 0.05 and −1.88 ± 0.05, b*: 5.50 ± 0.17 and 4.42 ± 0.15; drip loss: 0.71 ± 0.02 and 0.86 ± 0.02, cooking loss: 12.56 ± 0.22 and 14.69 ± 0.16 for turkeys slaughtered at 15 and 17 w, respectively) except on L* and WBSF. 5. The ageing of the meat affected pH, colour values, drip loss and WBSF, with differing degrees of evolution: mean values of L* (39.36 ± 0.35. 45.77 ± 0.20 and 46.30 ± 0.24, for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and drip loss (0.75 ± 0.03 and 0.84 ± 0.02 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) increased, those of a* (−1.77 ± 0.08, −1.94 ± 0.07 and −2.22 ± 0.05 for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and WBSF decreased (3.73 ± 0.06 and 2.63 ± 0.04 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively), those of pH decreased in the first 24 h and remained stable for the next 6 d (6.19 ± 0.02, 5.87 ± 0.01 and 5.88 ± 0.01), and those of b* increased in the first 24 h post-mortem and remained stable for the next 6 d (3.26 ± 0.31, 5.86 ± 0.16 and 5.47 ± 0.08). 6. The results revealed no critical differences between stunning methods, and suggest that animals slaughtered at 15 weeks present higher quality meat than those slaughtered at 17 weeks.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00071668.2017.1367091
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928785803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-33c6fba5d67e222bba5033aba1760fc2352138c2aa2458c5b01ea9da1e0cc9003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_grBHL6mzu81mc1OKH4VCQfS8TLaTNrpNbHZj6b83sfU0w_C8L8zD2K2AiQAD9wCQCa3NRILIJkLpDHJxxkZiqnUisjw_Z6OBSQbokl2F8PkXMemIzd_I0w_WjnhTclwTx8iDx269idTypuZb6i-7Dn0VDwMTu_aLDoGH2NU1rfi-ihs-W8prdlGiD3RzmmP28fz0PntNFsuX-exxkVRymsZEKafLAtOVzkhKWfQrKIUFikxD6aRKpVDGScQeNy4tQBDmKxQEzuUAaszujr3fbbPrKES7rYIj77GmpgtW5NJkJjV965g9HNGqLpt2i_um9Ssb8eCbtmz7p6tglQA7WLT_Fu1g0Z4sql9moGUK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928785803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Mauri, S. ; Guijarro, Á. ; Peña, F. ; Domenech, V. ; Avilés, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mauri, S. ; Guijarro, Á. ; Peña, F. ; Domenech, V. ; Avilés, C.</creatorcontrib><description>1. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of slaughter age and stunning method on the quality of turkey meat from poultry processing plants. 2. One hundred B.U.T. Premium turkeys were divided into 4 groups of 25 animals according to slaughter age (15 or 17 weeks) and CO 2 stunning procedure (G1 stepwise: step1: 30% CO 2 , 15 s; step 2: 55% CO 2 , 40 s; step 3: 70% CO 2 , 45 s; G2: progressive increase of the CO 2 concentration at a rate of 0.8% per s for 100 s). The quality of the breast meat was determined in fillets taken at different post-mortem times. 3. There were differences between the stunning groups for several variables (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.02; a*: −1.84 ± 0.05 and −2.21 ± 0.04; b*: 4.99 ± 0.15 and 4.68 ± 0.16; drip loss: 0.85 ± 0.02 and 0.71 ± 0.02 for G1 and G2, respectively), while no significant differences were found for L*, cooking loss and texture analysed with a Warner Bratzler Shear Force cell (WBSF). 4. Slaughter age had a significant effect on all the parameters studied (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.01; a*: −2.21 ± 0.05 and −1.88 ± 0.05, b*: 5.50 ± 0.17 and 4.42 ± 0.15; drip loss: 0.71 ± 0.02 and 0.86 ± 0.02, cooking loss: 12.56 ± 0.22 and 14.69 ± 0.16 for turkeys slaughtered at 15 and 17 w, respectively) except on L* and WBSF. 5. The ageing of the meat affected pH, colour values, drip loss and WBSF, with differing degrees of evolution: mean values of L* (39.36 ± 0.35. 45.77 ± 0.20 and 46.30 ± 0.24, for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and drip loss (0.75 ± 0.03 and 0.84 ± 0.02 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) increased, those of a* (−1.77 ± 0.08, −1.94 ± 0.07 and −2.22 ± 0.05 for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and WBSF decreased (3.73 ± 0.06 and 2.63 ± 0.04 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively), those of pH decreased in the first 24 h and remained stable for the next 6 d (6.19 ± 0.02, 5.87 ± 0.01 and 5.88 ± 0.01), and those of b* increased in the first 24 h post-mortem and remained stable for the next 6 d (3.26 ± 0.31, 5.86 ± 0.16 and 5.47 ± 0.08). 6. The results revealed no critical differences between stunning methods, and suggest that animals slaughtered at 15 weeks present higher quality meat than those slaughtered at 17 weeks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-1799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1367091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Breast muscle ; meat quality ; slaughter age ; stunning ; turkeys</subject><ispartof>British poultry science, 2017-11, Vol.58 (6), p.656-663</ispartof><rights>2017 British Poultry Science Ltd 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4613-8596 ; 0000-0002-5886-2944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mauri, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guijarro, Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenech, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avilés, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2</title><title>British poultry science</title><description>1. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of slaughter age and stunning method on the quality of turkey meat from poultry processing plants. 2. One hundred B.U.T. Premium turkeys were divided into 4 groups of 25 animals according to slaughter age (15 or 17 weeks) and CO 2 stunning procedure (G1 stepwise: step1: 30% CO 2 , 15 s; step 2: 55% CO 2 , 40 s; step 3: 70% CO 2 , 45 s; G2: progressive increase of the CO 2 concentration at a rate of 0.8% per s for 100 s). The quality of the breast meat was determined in fillets taken at different post-mortem times. 3. There were differences between the stunning groups for several variables (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.02; a*: −1.84 ± 0.05 and −2.21 ± 0.04; b*: 4.99 ± 0.15 and 4.68 ± 0.16; drip loss: 0.85 ± 0.02 and 0.71 ± 0.02 for G1 and G2, respectively), while no significant differences were found for L*, cooking loss and texture analysed with a Warner Bratzler Shear Force cell (WBSF). 4. Slaughter age had a significant effect on all the parameters studied (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.01; a*: −2.21 ± 0.05 and −1.88 ± 0.05, b*: 5.50 ± 0.17 and 4.42 ± 0.15; drip loss: 0.71 ± 0.02 and 0.86 ± 0.02, cooking loss: 12.56 ± 0.22 and 14.69 ± 0.16 for turkeys slaughtered at 15 and 17 w, respectively) except on L* and WBSF. 5. The ageing of the meat affected pH, colour values, drip loss and WBSF, with differing degrees of evolution: mean values of L* (39.36 ± 0.35. 45.77 ± 0.20 and 46.30 ± 0.24, for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and drip loss (0.75 ± 0.03 and 0.84 ± 0.02 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) increased, those of a* (−1.77 ± 0.08, −1.94 ± 0.07 and −2.22 ± 0.05 for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and WBSF decreased (3.73 ± 0.06 and 2.63 ± 0.04 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively), those of pH decreased in the first 24 h and remained stable for the next 6 d (6.19 ± 0.02, 5.87 ± 0.01 and 5.88 ± 0.01), and those of b* increased in the first 24 h post-mortem and remained stable for the next 6 d (3.26 ± 0.31, 5.86 ± 0.16 and 5.47 ± 0.08). 6. The results revealed no critical differences between stunning methods, and suggest that animals slaughtered at 15 weeks present higher quality meat than those slaughtered at 17 weeks.</description><subject>Breast muscle</subject><subject>meat quality</subject><subject>slaughter age</subject><subject>stunning</subject><subject>turkeys</subject><issn>0007-1668</issn><issn>1466-1799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_grBHL6mzu81mc1OKH4VCQfS8TLaTNrpNbHZj6b83sfU0w_C8L8zD2K2AiQAD9wCQCa3NRILIJkLpDHJxxkZiqnUisjw_Z6OBSQbokl2F8PkXMemIzd_I0w_WjnhTclwTx8iDx269idTypuZb6i-7Dn0VDwMTu_aLDoGH2NU1rfi-ihs-W8prdlGiD3RzmmP28fz0PntNFsuX-exxkVRymsZEKafLAtOVzkhKWfQrKIUFikxD6aRKpVDGScQeNy4tQBDmKxQEzuUAaszujr3fbbPrKES7rYIj77GmpgtW5NJkJjV965g9HNGqLpt2i_um9Ssb8eCbtmz7p6tglQA7WLT_Fu1g0Z4sql9moGUK</recordid><startdate>20171102</startdate><enddate>20171102</enddate><creator>Mauri, S.</creator><creator>Guijarro, Á.</creator><creator>Peña, F.</creator><creator>Domenech, V.</creator><creator>Avilés, C.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-2944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171102</creationdate><title>Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2</title><author>Mauri, S. ; Guijarro, Á. ; Peña, F. ; Domenech, V. ; Avilés, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-33c6fba5d67e222bba5033aba1760fc2352138c2aa2458c5b01ea9da1e0cc9003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Breast muscle</topic><topic>meat quality</topic><topic>slaughter age</topic><topic>stunning</topic><topic>turkeys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mauri, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guijarro, Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenech, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avilés, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mauri, S.</au><au>Guijarro, Á.</au><au>Peña, F.</au><au>Domenech, V.</au><au>Avilés, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2</atitle><jtitle>British poultry science</jtitle><date>2017-11-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>656-663</pages><issn>0007-1668</issn><eissn>1466-1799</eissn><abstract>1. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of slaughter age and stunning method on the quality of turkey meat from poultry processing plants. 2. One hundred B.U.T. Premium turkeys were divided into 4 groups of 25 animals according to slaughter age (15 or 17 weeks) and CO 2 stunning procedure (G1 stepwise: step1: 30% CO 2 , 15 s; step 2: 55% CO 2 , 40 s; step 3: 70% CO 2 , 45 s; G2: progressive increase of the CO 2 concentration at a rate of 0.8% per s for 100 s). The quality of the breast meat was determined in fillets taken at different post-mortem times. 3. There were differences between the stunning groups for several variables (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.02; a*: −1.84 ± 0.05 and −2.21 ± 0.04; b*: 4.99 ± 0.15 and 4.68 ± 0.16; drip loss: 0.85 ± 0.02 and 0.71 ± 0.02 for G1 and G2, respectively), while no significant differences were found for L*, cooking loss and texture analysed with a Warner Bratzler Shear Force cell (WBSF). 4. Slaughter age had a significant effect on all the parameters studied (pH: 6.01 ± 0.01 and 5.95 ± 0.01; a*: −2.21 ± 0.05 and −1.88 ± 0.05, b*: 5.50 ± 0.17 and 4.42 ± 0.15; drip loss: 0.71 ± 0.02 and 0.86 ± 0.02, cooking loss: 12.56 ± 0.22 and 14.69 ± 0.16 for turkeys slaughtered at 15 and 17 w, respectively) except on L* and WBSF. 5. The ageing of the meat affected pH, colour values, drip loss and WBSF, with differing degrees of evolution: mean values of L* (39.36 ± 0.35. 45.77 ± 0.20 and 46.30 ± 0.24, for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and drip loss (0.75 ± 0.03 and 0.84 ± 0.02 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) increased, those of a* (−1.77 ± 0.08, −1.94 ± 0.07 and −2.22 ± 0.05 for 20 min, 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively) and WBSF decreased (3.73 ± 0.06 and 2.63 ± 0.04 for 24 h and 7 d post mortem, respectively), those of pH decreased in the first 24 h and remained stable for the next 6 d (6.19 ± 0.02, 5.87 ± 0.01 and 5.88 ± 0.01), and those of b* increased in the first 24 h post-mortem and remained stable for the next 6 d (3.26 ± 0.31, 5.86 ± 0.16 and 5.47 ± 0.08). 6. The results revealed no critical differences between stunning methods, and suggest that animals slaughtered at 15 weeks present higher quality meat than those slaughtered at 17 weeks.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00071668.2017.1367091</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-2944</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1668
ispartof British poultry science, 2017-11, Vol.58 (6), p.656-663
issn 0007-1668
1466-1799
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785803
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Breast muscle
meat quality
slaughter age
stunning
turkeys
title Relevance of age at slaughter on meat quality of turkeys stunned with CO2
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relevance%20of%20age%20at%20slaughter%20on%20meat%20quality%20of%20turkeys%20stunned%20with%20CO2&rft.jtitle=British%20poultry%20science&rft.au=Mauri,%20S.&rft.date=2017-11-02&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=656-663&rft.issn=0007-1668&rft.eissn=1466-1799&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00071668.2017.1367091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1928785803%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-33c6fba5d67e222bba5033aba1760fc2352138c2aa2458c5b01ea9da1e0cc9003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928785803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true