Loading…

Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials

Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53
Main Authors: Bodner, Todd E, Bliese, Paul D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263
cites
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 103
creator Bodner, Todd E
Bliese, Paul D
description Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/apl0000251
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928785954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rHSEUBmAJLclN2k1_QBnopiRM68d41WW5-WggUCh3L44eE8NcZ6pOIf31cXKTFLqomwPHxxfhRegDwV8IZuKrmQZcD-XkAK2IYqolkndv0KruSKswwUfoOOd7jEnHFD5ER1RKzDu6XiF7DgVsCfG2MdE158F7SBBLME-7cgd1lxYxxmb0zebOxFt4stexQPq92Hp1Ud_ZkpsQm5_1ctyFP-CabQpmyO_QW18HvH-eJ2h7ebHdfG9vflxdb77dtIYJVVqHjfGE1dFRzrkkgrnedx471wNIsB7EWlFuFfFOGEYd77FwvRFGrumanaDP-9gpjb9myEXvQrYwDCbCOGdNFJVCcsW7Sj_9Q-_HOcX6OU0xZlJyxuj_1JKlCCUdqep0r2wac07g9ZTCzqQHTbBe-tF_-6n443Pk3O_AvdKXQio42wMzGT3lB2tSCXaAbOe09LKELamaaCbYI0semfc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928912141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><source>PsycARTICLES via EBSCO</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><creator>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D</creator><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D ; Chen, Gilad</creatorcontrib><description>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0000251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28805426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials ; Employment ; Health psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Intervention ; Mathematical Modeling ; Models, Statistical ; Organizational Innovation ; Psychology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards ; Statistical Estimation ; Statistical Power ; Studies ; Terminology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</description><subject>Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mathematical Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Statistical Estimation</subject><subject>Statistical Power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1rHSEUBmAJLclN2k1_QBnopiRM68d41WW5-WggUCh3L44eE8NcZ6pOIf31cXKTFLqomwPHxxfhRegDwV8IZuKrmQZcD-XkAK2IYqolkndv0KruSKswwUfoOOd7jEnHFD5ER1RKzDu6XiF7DgVsCfG2MdE158F7SBBLME-7cgd1lxYxxmb0zebOxFt4stexQPq92Hp1Ud_ZkpsQm5_1ctyFP-CabQpmyO_QW18HvH-eJ2h7ebHdfG9vflxdb77dtIYJVVqHjfGE1dFRzrkkgrnedx471wNIsB7EWlFuFfFOGEYd77FwvRFGrumanaDP-9gpjb9myEXvQrYwDCbCOGdNFJVCcsW7Sj_9Q-_HOcX6OU0xZlJyxuj_1JKlCCUdqep0r2wac07g9ZTCzqQHTbBe-tF_-6n443Pk3O_AvdKXQio42wMzGT3lB2tSCXaAbOe09LKELamaaCbYI0semfc</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Bodner, Todd E</creator><creator>Bliese, Paul D</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><author>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mathematical Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Statistical Estimation</topic><topic>Statistical Power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodner, Todd E</au><au>Bliese, Paul D</au><au>Chen, Gilad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>37-53</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>28805426</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0000251</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785954
source PsycARTICLES via EBSCO; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
subjects Clinical Trials
Employment
Health psychology
Human
Humans
Intervention
Mathematical Modeling
Models, Statistical
Organizational Innovation
Psychology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
Statistical Estimation
Statistical Power
Studies
Terminology
Workplaces
title Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A58%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20and%20Differentiating%20the%20Direction%20of%20Change%20and%20Intervention%20Effects%20in%20Randomized%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Bodner,%20Todd%20E&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=37-53&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0000251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928785954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928912141&rft_id=info:pmid/28805426&rfr_iscdi=true