Loading…
Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials
Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic op...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied psychology 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 53 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Bodner, Todd E Bliese, Paul D |
description | Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/apl0000251 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928785954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rHSEUBmAJLclN2k1_QBnopiRM68d41WW5-WggUCh3L44eE8NcZ6pOIf31cXKTFLqomwPHxxfhRegDwV8IZuKrmQZcD-XkAK2IYqolkndv0KruSKswwUfoOOd7jEnHFD5ER1RKzDu6XiF7DgVsCfG2MdE158F7SBBLME-7cgd1lxYxxmb0zebOxFt4stexQPq92Hp1Ud_ZkpsQm5_1ctyFP-CabQpmyO_QW18HvH-eJ2h7ebHdfG9vflxdb77dtIYJVVqHjfGE1dFRzrkkgrnedx471wNIsB7EWlFuFfFOGEYd77FwvRFGrumanaDP-9gpjb9myEXvQrYwDCbCOGdNFJVCcsW7Sj_9Q-_HOcX6OU0xZlJyxuj_1JKlCCUdqep0r2wac07g9ZTCzqQHTbBe-tF_-6n443Pk3O_AvdKXQio42wMzGT3lB2tSCXaAbOe09LKELamaaCbYI0semfc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928912141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><source>PsycARTICLES via EBSCO</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><creator>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D</creator><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D ; Chen, Gilad</creatorcontrib><description>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0000251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28805426</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Trials ; Employment ; Health psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Intervention ; Mathematical Modeling ; Models, Statistical ; Organizational Innovation ; Psychology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards ; Statistical Estimation ; Statistical Power ; Studies ; Terminology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</description><subject>Clinical Trials</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mathematical Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Statistical Estimation</subject><subject>Statistical Power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1rHSEUBmAJLclN2k1_QBnopiRM68d41WW5-WggUCh3L44eE8NcZ6pOIf31cXKTFLqomwPHxxfhRegDwV8IZuKrmQZcD-XkAK2IYqolkndv0KruSKswwUfoOOd7jEnHFD5ER1RKzDu6XiF7DgVsCfG2MdE158F7SBBLME-7cgd1lxYxxmb0zebOxFt4stexQPq92Hp1Ud_ZkpsQm5_1ctyFP-CabQpmyO_QW18HvH-eJ2h7ebHdfG9vflxdb77dtIYJVVqHjfGE1dFRzrkkgrnedx471wNIsB7EWlFuFfFOGEYd77FwvRFGrumanaDP-9gpjb9myEXvQrYwDCbCOGdNFJVCcsW7Sj_9Q-_HOcX6OU0xZlJyxuj_1JKlCCUdqep0r2wac07g9ZTCzqQHTbBe-tF_-6n443Pk3O_AvdKXQio42wMzGT3lB2tSCXaAbOe09LKELamaaCbYI0semfc</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Bodner, Todd E</creator><creator>Bliese, Paul D</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</title><author>Bodner, Todd E ; Bliese, Paul D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mathematical Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Statistical Estimation</topic><topic>Statistical Power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Todd E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliese, Paul D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodner, Todd E</au><au>Bliese, Paul D</au><au>Chen, Gilad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>37-53</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>Calls continue for randomized interventions in organizational settings. In many cases, however, practical constraints require researchers to use 2-wave randomized pretest-posttest control group designs. We discuss the importance of randomized trials for theory development with a focus on analytic options for 2-wave designs. Our discussion has implications for both designing studies and interpreting results. We review 23 published work and organizational health psychology intervention studies and find that a majority of studies featured a statistical model known to have low statistical power relative to other options. Furthermore, a majority of studies invoked terminology implying the direction of change without providing explicit statistical tests. To improve research practice, we detail statistical power differences in 3 commonly used statistical models and emphasize the distinction between (a) intervention effects and (b) the size and direction of change over time. We encourage researchers to provide inferential evidence for both types of information and show that only 1 of the 3 reviewed models provides information on the direction of change over time, but at a potential expense for statistical power to detect intervention effects. A reanalysis of data from a published work-family workplace intervention illustrates these nuances and supports recommendations for research practice. We conclude by providing recommendations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>28805426</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0000251</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-8879</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 2018-01, Vol.103 (1), p.37-53 |
issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928785954 |
source | PsycARTICLES via EBSCO; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
subjects | Clinical Trials Employment Health psychology Human Humans Intervention Mathematical Modeling Models, Statistical Organizational Innovation Psychology Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards Statistical Estimation Statistical Power Studies Terminology Workplaces |
title | Detecting and Differentiating the Direction of Change and Intervention Effects in Randomized Trials |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A58%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20and%20Differentiating%20the%20Direction%20of%20Change%20and%20Intervention%20Effects%20in%20Randomized%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Bodner,%20Todd%20E&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=37-53&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0000251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928785954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-d0aaf13d0a425558173dbf4f0ddbee8ecfe76925c91fd7a32d5b07dba7a86263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928912141&rft_id=info:pmid/28805426&rfr_iscdi=true |