Loading…

Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques

Aspergillus flavus is a filamentous fungus that produces mycotoxins in many food and feed crops, such as maize (Zea mays L.). Isolates were analyzed for toxin production by nucleic acid profiles in an attempt to differentiate aflatoxigenic from nonaflatoxigenic isolates. A total of 41 aflatoxigenic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mycopathologia (1975) 2006-02, Vol.161 (2), p.93-99
Main Authors: Baird, R.E, Trigiano, R.N, Windham, G, Williams, P, Kelley, R, Abbas, H.K, Moulton, J.K, Scruggs, M.L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23
container_end_page 99
container_issue 2
container_start_page 93
container_title Mycopathologia (1975)
container_volume 161
creator Baird, R.E
Trigiano, R.N
Windham, G
Williams, P
Kelley, R
Abbas, H.K
Moulton, J.K
Scruggs, M.L
description Aspergillus flavus is a filamentous fungus that produces mycotoxins in many food and feed crops, such as maize (Zea mays L.). Isolates were analyzed for toxin production by nucleic acid profiles in an attempt to differentiate aflatoxigenic from nonaflatoxigenic isolates. A total of 41 aflatoxigenic and 34 nonalfatoxigenic isolates were included in the study. The isolates were evaluated initially using DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) without clear resolution of the groups. A weak association of aflatoxigenic isolates was observed, as evidenced by their clustering in 18 of 81 trees recovered from maximum parsimony analysis of binary characters derived from arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles (ASAP) data; nonaflatoxigenic isolates exhibited a pattern of paraphyletic laddering. Up to five markers unambiguously supported the aflatoxigenic isolate grouping, but the presence of alternative conflicting topologies in equally parsimonious trees precluded the observation of meaningful statistical support. With additional markers for genome of A. flavus, this method could be used to resolve toxigenic from nontoxigenic strains. This additional work could resolve aflatoxigenic isolates of A. flavus present on maize plants using ASAP, which would reduce labor intense costs and potentially lead to faster determination of resistant cultivars in breeding efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11046-005-0121-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19289150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>985024291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhi1UBMuWB-iljThwC52xkzg5rpYuRUL0UFbiZnkde2uU2KmdoPbIm9fbXQnBaeTR94_H_gj5hHCFAPxrRISiygHKHJBizo7IDEvOcqgZ_UBmwADzoq4eT8lZjE8AKYX8hJxiVVQMGjojL0vfDzLY6F3mTbYwnRz9H7vVzqpMuja7906-ad5Gn446_sfjoMPWdt0UswQ9pzJF67bZ9f0iW_RDZ41VcrRp-Cq1dRiCdeMOeNDql7O_Jx0_kmMju6jPD3VO1qtvD8vv-d2Pm9vl4i5XrMYx16XRUjesLDkvuFE1pxulEFouG6YNGMrbSjJTbqSComCNgrqoFepmY0zdUjYnl_u5Q_C7e0fR26h010mn_RQFNrRusIQEXrwDn_wUXNpNUJq-uWAUE4R7SAUfY9BGpKf1MvwVCGInR-zliCRH7OQIljKfD4OnTa_b18TBRgK-7AEjvZDbZEWsf1LApBGqquSU_QNsJ5X8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221214321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Baird, R.E ; Trigiano, R.N ; Windham, G ; Williams, P ; Kelley, R ; Abbas, H.K ; Moulton, J.K ; Scruggs, M.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.E ; Trigiano, R.N ; Windham, G ; Williams, P ; Kelley, R ; Abbas, H.K ; Moulton, J.K ; Scruggs, M.L</creatorcontrib><description>Aspergillus flavus is a filamentous fungus that produces mycotoxins in many food and feed crops, such as maize (Zea mays L.). Isolates were analyzed for toxin production by nucleic acid profiles in an attempt to differentiate aflatoxigenic from nonaflatoxigenic isolates. A total of 41 aflatoxigenic and 34 nonalfatoxigenic isolates were included in the study. The isolates were evaluated initially using DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) without clear resolution of the groups. A weak association of aflatoxigenic isolates was observed, as evidenced by their clustering in 18 of 81 trees recovered from maximum parsimony analysis of binary characters derived from arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles (ASAP) data; nonaflatoxigenic isolates exhibited a pattern of paraphyletic laddering. Up to five markers unambiguously supported the aflatoxigenic isolate grouping, but the presence of alternative conflicting topologies in equally parsimonious trees precluded the observation of meaningful statistical support. With additional markers for genome of A. flavus, this method could be used to resolve toxigenic from nontoxigenic strains. This additional work could resolve aflatoxigenic isolates of A. flavus present on maize plants using ASAP, which would reduce labor intense costs and potentially lead to faster determination of resistant cultivars in breeding efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-486X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11046-005-0121-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16463092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aflatoxins - biosynthesis ; Aflatoxins - genetics ; arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles ; Aspergillus flavus ; Aspergillus flavus - classification ; Aspergillus flavus - genetics ; Aspergillus flavus - metabolism ; biosynthesis ; Carcinogens ; DNA fingerprinting ; DNA Fingerprinting - methods ; DNA, Fungal - chemistry ; DNA, Fungal - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - chemistry ; DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - genetics ; Fungi ; genetic techniques and protocols ; Morphology ; mycotoxins ; nontoxigenic strains ; Plant pathology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Ribosomal DNA ; strain differences ; toxigenic strains ; Zea mays ; Zea mays - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Mycopathologia (1975), 2006-02, Vol.161 (2), p.93-99</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16463092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trigiano, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windham, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, H.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, J.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, M.L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques</title><title>Mycopathologia (1975)</title><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><description>Aspergillus flavus is a filamentous fungus that produces mycotoxins in many food and feed crops, such as maize (Zea mays L.). Isolates were analyzed for toxin production by nucleic acid profiles in an attempt to differentiate aflatoxigenic from nonaflatoxigenic isolates. A total of 41 aflatoxigenic and 34 nonalfatoxigenic isolates were included in the study. The isolates were evaluated initially using DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) without clear resolution of the groups. A weak association of aflatoxigenic isolates was observed, as evidenced by their clustering in 18 of 81 trees recovered from maximum parsimony analysis of binary characters derived from arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles (ASAP) data; nonaflatoxigenic isolates exhibited a pattern of paraphyletic laddering. Up to five markers unambiguously supported the aflatoxigenic isolate grouping, but the presence of alternative conflicting topologies in equally parsimonious trees precluded the observation of meaningful statistical support. With additional markers for genome of A. flavus, this method could be used to resolve toxigenic from nontoxigenic strains. This additional work could resolve aflatoxigenic isolates of A. flavus present on maize plants using ASAP, which would reduce labor intense costs and potentially lead to faster determination of resistant cultivars in breeding efforts.</description><subject>Aflatoxins - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Aflatoxins - genetics</subject><subject>arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus - classification</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus - genetics</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus - metabolism</subject><subject>biosynthesis</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>DNA fingerprinting</subject><subject>DNA Fingerprinting - methods</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - genetics</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>genetic techniques and protocols</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>mycotoxins</subject><subject>nontoxigenic strains</subject><subject>Plant pathology</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>strain differences</subject><subject>toxigenic strains</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zea mays - microbiology</subject><issn>0301-486X</issn><issn>1573-0832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFO3DAQhi1UBMuWB-iljThwC52xkzg5rpYuRUL0UFbiZnkde2uU2KmdoPbIm9fbXQnBaeTR94_H_gj5hHCFAPxrRISiygHKHJBizo7IDEvOcqgZ_UBmwADzoq4eT8lZjE8AKYX8hJxiVVQMGjojL0vfDzLY6F3mTbYwnRz9H7vVzqpMuja7906-ad5Gn446_sfjoMPWdt0UswQ9pzJF67bZ9f0iW_RDZ41VcrRp-Cq1dRiCdeMOeNDql7O_Jx0_kmMju6jPD3VO1qtvD8vv-d2Pm9vl4i5XrMYx16XRUjesLDkvuFE1pxulEFouG6YNGMrbSjJTbqSComCNgrqoFepmY0zdUjYnl_u5Q_C7e0fR26h010mn_RQFNrRusIQEXrwDn_wUXNpNUJq-uWAUE4R7SAUfY9BGpKf1MvwVCGInR-zliCRH7OQIljKfD4OnTa_b18TBRgK-7AEjvZDbZEWsf1LApBGqquSU_QNsJ5X8</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Baird, R.E</creator><creator>Trigiano, R.N</creator><creator>Windham, G</creator><creator>Williams, P</creator><creator>Kelley, R</creator><creator>Abbas, H.K</creator><creator>Moulton, J.K</creator><creator>Scruggs, M.L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques</title><author>Baird, R.E ; Trigiano, R.N ; Windham, G ; Williams, P ; Kelley, R ; Abbas, H.K ; Moulton, J.K ; Scruggs, M.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aflatoxins - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Aflatoxins - genetics</topic><topic>arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus - classification</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus - genetics</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus - metabolism</topic><topic>biosynthesis</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>DNA fingerprinting</topic><topic>DNA Fingerprinting - methods</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - genetics</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>genetic techniques and protocols</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>mycotoxins</topic><topic>nontoxigenic strains</topic><topic>Plant pathology</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>strain differences</topic><topic>toxigenic strains</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zea mays - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trigiano, R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windham, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, H.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, J.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, M.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baird, R.E</au><au>Trigiano, R.N</au><au>Windham, G</au><au>Williams, P</au><au>Kelley, R</au><au>Abbas, H.K</au><au>Moulton, J.K</au><au>Scruggs, M.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>93-99</pages><issn>0301-486X</issn><eissn>1573-0832</eissn><abstract>Aspergillus flavus is a filamentous fungus that produces mycotoxins in many food and feed crops, such as maize (Zea mays L.). Isolates were analyzed for toxin production by nucleic acid profiles in an attempt to differentiate aflatoxigenic from nonaflatoxigenic isolates. A total of 41 aflatoxigenic and 34 nonalfatoxigenic isolates were included in the study. The isolates were evaluated initially using DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) without clear resolution of the groups. A weak association of aflatoxigenic isolates was observed, as evidenced by their clustering in 18 of 81 trees recovered from maximum parsimony analysis of binary characters derived from arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles (ASAP) data; nonaflatoxigenic isolates exhibited a pattern of paraphyletic laddering. Up to five markers unambiguously supported the aflatoxigenic isolate grouping, but the presence of alternative conflicting topologies in equally parsimonious trees precluded the observation of meaningful statistical support. With additional markers for genome of A. flavus, this method could be used to resolve toxigenic from nontoxigenic strains. This additional work could resolve aflatoxigenic isolates of A. flavus present on maize plants using ASAP, which would reduce labor intense costs and potentially lead to faster determination of resistant cultivars in breeding efforts.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16463092</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11046-005-0121-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-486X
ispartof Mycopathologia (1975), 2006-02, Vol.161 (2), p.93-99
issn 0301-486X
1573-0832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19289150
source Springer Link
subjects Aflatoxins - biosynthesis
Aflatoxins - genetics
arbitrary signatures from amplification profiles
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus - classification
Aspergillus flavus - genetics
Aspergillus flavus - metabolism
biosynthesis
Carcinogens
DNA fingerprinting
DNA Fingerprinting - methods
DNA, Fungal - chemistry
DNA, Fungal - genetics
DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - chemistry
DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - genetics
Fungi
genetic techniques and protocols
Morphology
mycotoxins
nontoxigenic strains
Plant pathology
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism
Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Ribosomal DNA
strain differences
toxigenic strains
Zea mays
Zea mays - microbiology
title Comparison of Aflatoxigenic and Nonaflatoxigenic Isolates of Aspergillus flavus using DNA Amplification Fingerprinting Techniques
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A31%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Aflatoxigenic%20and%20Nonaflatoxigenic%20Isolates%20of%20Aspergillus%20flavus%20using%20DNA%20Amplification%20Fingerprinting%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Mycopathologia%20(1975)&rft.au=Baird,%20R.E&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=93-99&rft.issn=0301-486X&rft.eissn=1573-0832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11046-005-0121-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E985024291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e5feae93557747fc872bcc10d7a93ef0f27d6a3f5bac04439c0848c1e9bff8d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221214321&rft_id=info:pmid/16463092&rfr_iscdi=true