Loading…

Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss

Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296
Main Authors: McClenachan, Loren, Jeremy BC Jackson, Marah JH Newman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3
container_end_page 296
container_issue 6
container_start_page 290
container_title Frontiers in ecology and the environment
container_volume 4
creator McClenachan, Loren
Jeremy BC Jackson
Marah JH Newman
description Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbean‐wide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a risk‐prone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3868841</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3868841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1KxDAUhYso-PsGgl2JgjPe_DRtdCV1RoXBWagrkUvSphrptGPSUXx7U6s-gKscOOd-nJwoOiEwJpmEU5JwGEkqkyMKII75I5Vwlt_Mr-_un-gYxvn8nK5FW0OMgVz_1eFkM9r2_hWAMpqwrSjP28Yb96462zaxXSxrW3xrH7dV_GJ91zpbxN6ouFu5rjZxY3xnm-dYG1W8xHXr_W60Uanam72fdyd6mE7u8-vRbH51k1_MRgWXKYwqzXUoqhIidCpKwVNNKymU0JLw1FBgjOmSiJRDWZVaZ6pkSZJpUAWpwh3biQ4H7tK1b6tQAxfWF6auVWPalUcS_kc5iBC8HIKFC_WcqXDp7EK5TySA_YLYz4H9HNgviBxDMRwWRIpBzpEGzO2A-bC1-fwXA6eTSe9yEcwA3B-Ar_2sf0CWiSzjJNgHg12pFtWzsx4f7igQAUBkCCXsCy1hkPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19292406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</creator><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><description>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbean‐wide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a risk‐prone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Beaches ; Coastal ecology ; Conservation biology ; conservation programs ; Depopulation ; Environmental conservation ; Eretmochelys imbricata ; Human ecology ; humans ; Marine ecosystems ; nesting ; Nesting sites ; Population ecology ; population growth ; population size ; Research Communications ; sea turtles ; Turtles</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3868841$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3868841$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeremy BC Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbean‐wide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a risk‐prone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</description><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>conservation programs</subject><subject>Depopulation</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Eretmochelys imbricata</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>nesting</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Research Communications</subject><subject>sea turtles</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkM1KxDAUhYso-PsGgl2JgjPe_DRtdCV1RoXBWagrkUvSphrptGPSUXx7U6s-gKscOOd-nJwoOiEwJpmEU5JwGEkqkyMKII75I5Vwlt_Mr-_un-gYxvn8nK5FW0OMgVz_1eFkM9r2_hWAMpqwrSjP28Yb96462zaxXSxrW3xrH7dV_GJ91zpbxN6ouFu5rjZxY3xnm-dYG1W8xHXr_W60Uanam72fdyd6mE7u8-vRbH51k1_MRgWXKYwqzXUoqhIidCpKwVNNKymU0JLw1FBgjOmSiJRDWZVaZ6pkSZJpUAWpwh3biQ4H7tK1b6tQAxfWF6auVWPalUcS_kc5iBC8HIKFC_WcqXDp7EK5TySA_YLYz4H9HNgviBxDMRwWRIpBzpEGzO2A-bC1-fwXA6eTSe9yEcwA3B-Ar_2sf0CWiSzjJNgHg12pFtWzsx4f7igQAUBkCCXsCy1hkPQ</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>McClenachan, Loren</creator><creator>Jeremy BC Jackson</creator><creator>Marah JH Newman</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><author>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>conservation programs</topic><topic>Depopulation</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Eretmochelys imbricata</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>nesting</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Research Communications</topic><topic>sea turtles</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeremy BC Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClenachan, Loren</au><au>Jeremy BC Jackson</au><au>Marah JH Newman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>290-296</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbean‐wide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a risk‐prone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-9295
ispartof Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296
issn 1540-9295
1540-9309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292406
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Beaches
Coastal ecology
Conservation biology
conservation programs
Depopulation
Environmental conservation
Eretmochelys imbricata
Human ecology
humans
Marine ecosystems
nesting
Nesting sites
Population ecology
population growth
population size
Research Communications
sea turtles
Turtles
title Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20implications%20of%20historic%20sea%20turtle%20nesting%20beach%20loss&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=McClenachan,%20Loren&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=290-296&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4%5B290:CIOHST%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3868841%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19292406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3868841&rfr_iscdi=true