Loading…
Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss
Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3 |
container_end_page | 296 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Frontiers in ecology and the environment |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | McClenachan, Loren Jeremy BC Jackson Marah JH Newman |
description | Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbeanâwide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a riskâprone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3868841</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3868841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1KxDAUhYso-PsGgl2JgjPe_DRtdCV1RoXBWagrkUvSphrptGPSUXx7U6s-gKscOOd-nJwoOiEwJpmEU5JwGEkqkyMKII75I5Vwlt_Mr-_un-gYxvn8nK5FW0OMgVz_1eFkM9r2_hWAMpqwrSjP28Yb96462zaxXSxrW3xrH7dV_GJ91zpbxN6ouFu5rjZxY3xnm-dYG1W8xHXr_W60Uanam72fdyd6mE7u8-vRbH51k1_MRgWXKYwqzXUoqhIidCpKwVNNKymU0JLw1FBgjOmSiJRDWZVaZ6pkSZJpUAWpwh3biQ4H7tK1b6tQAxfWF6auVWPalUcS_kc5iBC8HIKFC_WcqXDp7EK5TySA_YLYz4H9HNgviBxDMRwWRIpBzpEGzO2A-bC1-fwXA6eTSe9yEcwA3B-Ar_2sf0CWiSzjJNgHg12pFtWzsx4f7igQAUBkCCXsCy1hkPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19292406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</creator><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><description>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbeanâwide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a riskâprone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Beaches ; Coastal ecology ; Conservation biology ; conservation programs ; Depopulation ; Environmental conservation ; Eretmochelys imbricata ; Human ecology ; humans ; Marine ecosystems ; nesting ; Nesting sites ; Population ecology ; population growth ; population size ; Research Communications ; sea turtles ; Turtles</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3868841$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3868841$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeremy BC Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbeanâwide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a riskâprone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</description><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>conservation programs</subject><subject>Depopulation</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Eretmochelys imbricata</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>nesting</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Research Communications</subject><subject>sea turtles</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkM1KxDAUhYso-PsGgl2JgjPe_DRtdCV1RoXBWagrkUvSphrptGPSUXx7U6s-gKscOOd-nJwoOiEwJpmEU5JwGEkqkyMKII75I5Vwlt_Mr-_un-gYxvn8nK5FW0OMgVz_1eFkM9r2_hWAMpqwrSjP28Yb96462zaxXSxrW3xrH7dV_GJ91zpbxN6ouFu5rjZxY3xnm-dYG1W8xHXr_W60Uanam72fdyd6mE7u8-vRbH51k1_MRgWXKYwqzXUoqhIidCpKwVNNKymU0JLw1FBgjOmSiJRDWZVaZ6pkSZJpUAWpwh3biQ4H7tK1b6tQAxfWF6auVWPalUcS_kc5iBC8HIKFC_WcqXDp7EK5TySA_YLYz4H9HNgviBxDMRwWRIpBzpEGzO2A-bC1-fwXA6eTSe9yEcwA3B-Ar_2sf0CWiSzjJNgHg12pFtWzsx4f7igQAUBkCCXsCy1hkPQ</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>McClenachan, Loren</creator><creator>Jeremy BC Jackson</creator><creator>Marah JH Newman</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</title><author>McClenachan, Loren ; Jeremy BC Jackson ; Marah JH Newman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>conservation programs</topic><topic>Depopulation</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Eretmochelys imbricata</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>nesting</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Research Communications</topic><topic>sea turtles</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClenachan, Loren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeremy BC Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marah JH Newman</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClenachan, Loren</au><au>Jeremy BC Jackson</au><au>Marah JH Newman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>290-296</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Populations of endangered Caribbean sea turtles are far more depleted than realized because current conservation assessments do not reflect historic nesting data. We used historical sources to analyze changes in the numbers of nesting populations and population sizes for green and hawksbill turtles on all known nesting beaches in the Caribbean over the past millennium. We present the first maps of historic nesting populations, which provide the basis for an objective measure of changes in distribution and abundance. Our results indicate that 20% of historic nesting sites have been lost entirely and 50% of the remaining nesting sites have been reduced to dangerously low populations. Recent conservation efforts have resulted in large population increases at several nesting sites, but loss of widespread nesting throughout the Caribbean and reductions in the Caribbeanâwide population since human hunting began indicate that Caribbean turtles are far from recovered. Focusing attention on a small number of nesting populations is a riskâprone strategy; conservation programs should instead broaden their scope to protect both large and small nesting populations throughout the Caribbean.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[290:CIOHST]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-9295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2006-08, Vol.4 (6), p.290-296 |
issn | 1540-9295 1540-9309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292406 |
source | Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Beaches Coastal ecology Conservation biology conservation programs Depopulation Environmental conservation Eretmochelys imbricata Human ecology humans Marine ecosystems nesting Nesting sites Population ecology population growth population size Research Communications sea turtles Turtles |
title | Conservation implications of historic sea turtle nesting beach loss |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20implications%20of%20historic%20sea%20turtle%20nesting%20beach%20loss&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=McClenachan,%20Loren&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=290-296&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4%5B290:CIOHST%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3868841%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4970-fb4b290a516b76d647b2f96a6b9147e20333bd16740dfdbb8ad3558b0ac1f90a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19292406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3868841&rfr_iscdi=true |