Loading…
Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift
The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03 |
container_end_page | 212 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Dabrowski, J.M. Bennett, E.R. Bollen, A. Schulz, R. |
description | The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22
mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly (
R
2
=
0.99;
p
<
0.0001;
n
=
5) from 0.24
μg/l to 0.11
μg/l during the 10
mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22
mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly (
R
2
=
0.93;
p
=
0.0084;
n
=
5) from 4.3
μg/l to 1.7
μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10
mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10
mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22
mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653505007356</els_id><sourcerecordid>19292536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0f6HdHprbuvpYrVe9FdMvSMihzaUXMZZGtszuaivJAefXR2YN6bEwMCA9rzTzEPKB0SWjrP20X5odDiFNO4y45JTK5ak4e0EWrFupmnHVvSQLShtZt1LIC3KZ0p7SEpbqNblgLS00bxbkz63PfgvZh7EKroJHP067kOoB8-7YV36soHrALWbIaKuUI8LwuVqHYYLo0xyKhzE4V1cwFmKKcKxt9C6_Ia8c9AnfnvsVuf_29ff6R31z9_3n-stNbZqW5lrQVljgtkynlHOrcooAlFtmjdtg1zToNsAbu-mEoEwyZ5WTstxKI7ih4opcz-9OMfw9YMp68Mlg38OI4ZA0U1xxKdoCqhk0MaQU0ekp-gHiUTOqT2L1Xv8jVp_E6lNxVrLvzp8cNgPa5-TZZAE-ngFIBnoXYTQ-PXMrIRrVdoV7P3MOgoZtkajvf3HKympUyrZRhVjPBBZpDx6jTsbjaND6iCZrG_x_DPwEBWam6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19292536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22
mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly (
R
2
=
0.99;
p
<
0.0001;
n
=
5) from 0.24
μg/l to 0.11
μg/l during the 10
mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22
mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly (
R
2
=
0.93;
p
=
0.0084;
n
=
5) from 4.3
μg/l to 1.7
μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10
mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10
mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22
mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16002124</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural runoff ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Azinphos-methyl ; Azinphosmethyl - analysis ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; environmental fate ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; insecticide residues ; macrophytes ; Magnoliopsida - growth & development ; Mitigation ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; pollution control ; Pollution, environment geology ; Runoff ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil science ; sorption ; Spray-drift ; streams ; Vegetation ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17334968$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16002124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22
mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly (
R
2
=
0.99;
p
<
0.0001;
n
=
5) from 0.24
μg/l to 0.11
μg/l during the 10
mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22
mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly (
R
2
=
0.93;
p
=
0.0084;
n
=
5) from 4.3
μg/l to 1.7
μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10
mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10
mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22
mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</description><subject>agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Azinphos-methyl</subject><subject>Azinphosmethyl - analysis</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>environmental fate</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>insecticide residues</subject><subject>macrophytes</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - growth & development</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>sorption</subject><subject>Spray-drift</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0f6HdHprbuvpYrVe9FdMvSMihzaUXMZZGtszuaivJAefXR2YN6bEwMCA9rzTzEPKB0SWjrP20X5odDiFNO4y45JTK5ak4e0EWrFupmnHVvSQLShtZt1LIC3KZ0p7SEpbqNblgLS00bxbkz63PfgvZh7EKroJHP067kOoB8-7YV36soHrALWbIaKuUI8LwuVqHYYLo0xyKhzE4V1cwFmKKcKxt9C6_Ia8c9AnfnvsVuf_29ff6R31z9_3n-stNbZqW5lrQVljgtkynlHOrcooAlFtmjdtg1zToNsAbu-mEoEwyZ5WTstxKI7ih4opcz-9OMfw9YMp68Mlg38OI4ZA0U1xxKdoCqhk0MaQU0ekp-gHiUTOqT2L1Xv8jVp_E6lNxVrLvzp8cNgPa5-TZZAE-ngFIBnoXYTQ-PXMrIRrVdoV7P3MOgoZtkajvf3HKympUyrZRhVjPBBZpDx6jTsbjaND6iCZrG_x_DPwEBWam6g</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Dabrowski, J.M.</creator><creator>Bennett, E.R.</creator><creator>Bollen, A.</creator><creator>Schulz, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><author>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Azinphos-methyl</topic><topic>Azinphosmethyl - analysis</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>environmental fate</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>insecticide residues</topic><topic>macrophytes</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - growth & development</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>sorption</topic><topic>Spray-drift</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dabrowski, J.M.</au><au>Bennett, E.R.</au><au>Bollen, A.</au><au>Schulz, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>204-212</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22
mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly (
R
2
=
0.99;
p
<
0.0001;
n
=
5) from 0.24
μg/l to 0.11
μg/l during the 10
mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22
mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly (
R
2
=
0.93;
p
=
0.0084;
n
=
5) from 4.3
μg/l to 1.7
μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10
mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10
mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22
mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16002124</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292536 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | agricultural runoff Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Applied sciences Azinphos-methyl Azinphosmethyl - analysis Biodegradation, Environmental Biological and medical sciences Continental surface waters Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics environmental fate Exact sciences and technology Fresh Water - chemistry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geologic Sediments - chemistry insecticide residues macrophytes Magnoliopsida - growth & development Mitigation Natural water pollution Pollution pollution control Pollution, environment geology Runoff Soil and water pollution Soil science sorption Spray-drift streams Vegetation Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Water Movements Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis water pollution Water treatment and pollution |
title | Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A17%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20azinphos-methyl%20in%20a%20vegetated%20stream:%20Comparison%20of%20runoff-%20and%20spray-drift&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Dabrowski,%20J.M.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=204-212&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19292536%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19292536&rft_id=info:pmid/16002124&rfr_iscdi=true |