Loading…

Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift

The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212
Main Authors: Dabrowski, J.M., Bennett, E.R., Bollen, A., Schulz, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 204
container_title Chemosphere (Oxford)
container_volume 62
creator Dabrowski, J.M.
Bennett, E.R.
Bollen, A.
Schulz, R.
description The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly ( R 2 = 0.99; p < 0.0001; n = 5) from 0.24 μg/l to 0.11 μg/l during the 10 mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22 mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly ( R 2 = 0.93; p = 0.0084; n = 5) from 4.3 μg/l to 1.7 μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10 mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10 mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22 mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653505007356</els_id><sourcerecordid>19292536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0f6HdHprbuvpYrVe9FdMvSMihzaUXMZZGtszuaivJAefXR2YN6bEwMCA9rzTzEPKB0SWjrP20X5odDiFNO4y45JTK5ak4e0EWrFupmnHVvSQLShtZt1LIC3KZ0p7SEpbqNblgLS00bxbkz63PfgvZh7EKroJHP067kOoB8-7YV36soHrALWbIaKuUI8LwuVqHYYLo0xyKhzE4V1cwFmKKcKxt9C6_Ia8c9AnfnvsVuf_29ff6R31z9_3n-stNbZqW5lrQVljgtkynlHOrcooAlFtmjdtg1zToNsAbu-mEoEwyZ5WTstxKI7ih4opcz-9OMfw9YMp68Mlg38OI4ZA0U1xxKdoCqhk0MaQU0ekp-gHiUTOqT2L1Xv8jVp_E6lNxVrLvzp8cNgPa5-TZZAE-ngFIBnoXYTQ-PXMrIRrVdoV7P3MOgoZtkajvf3HKympUyrZRhVjPBBZpDx6jTsbjaND6iCZrG_x_DPwEBWam6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19292536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly ( R 2 = 0.99; p &lt; 0.0001; n = 5) from 0.24 μg/l to 0.11 μg/l during the 10 mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22 mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly ( R 2 = 0.93; p = 0.0084; n = 5) from 4.3 μg/l to 1.7 μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10 mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10 mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22 mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16002124</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural runoff ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Azinphos-methyl ; Azinphosmethyl - analysis ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; environmental fate ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; insecticide residues ; macrophytes ; Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development ; Mitigation ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; pollution control ; Pollution, environment geology ; Runoff ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil science ; sorption ; Spray-drift ; streams ; Vegetation ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17334968$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16002124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly ( R 2 = 0.99; p &lt; 0.0001; n = 5) from 0.24 μg/l to 0.11 μg/l during the 10 mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22 mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly ( R 2 = 0.93; p = 0.0084; n = 5) from 4.3 μg/l to 1.7 μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10 mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10 mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22 mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</description><subject>agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Azinphos-methyl</subject><subject>Azinphosmethyl - analysis</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>environmental fate</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>insecticide residues</subject><subject>macrophytes</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>sorption</subject><subject>Spray-drift</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0f6HdHprbuvpYrVe9FdMvSMihzaUXMZZGtszuaivJAefXR2YN6bEwMCA9rzTzEPKB0SWjrP20X5odDiFNO4y45JTK5ak4e0EWrFupmnHVvSQLShtZt1LIC3KZ0p7SEpbqNblgLS00bxbkz63PfgvZh7EKroJHP067kOoB8-7YV36soHrALWbIaKuUI8LwuVqHYYLo0xyKhzE4V1cwFmKKcKxt9C6_Ia8c9AnfnvsVuf_29ff6R31z9_3n-stNbZqW5lrQVljgtkynlHOrcooAlFtmjdtg1zToNsAbu-mEoEwyZ5WTstxKI7ih4opcz-9OMfw9YMp68Mlg38OI4ZA0U1xxKdoCqhk0MaQU0ekp-gHiUTOqT2L1Xv8jVp_E6lNxVrLvzp8cNgPa5-TZZAE-ngFIBnoXYTQ-PXMrIRrVdoV7P3MOgoZtkajvf3HKympUyrZRhVjPBBZpDx6jTsbjaND6iCZrG_x_DPwEBWam6g</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Dabrowski, J.M.</creator><creator>Bennett, E.R.</creator><creator>Bollen, A.</creator><creator>Schulz, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</title><author>Dabrowski, J.M. ; Bennett, E.R. ; Bollen, A. ; Schulz, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Azinphos-methyl</topic><topic>Azinphosmethyl - analysis</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>environmental fate</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>insecticide residues</topic><topic>macrophytes</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>sorption</topic><topic>Spray-drift</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, E.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dabrowski, J.M.</au><au>Bennett, E.R.</au><au>Bollen, A.</au><au>Schulz, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>204-212</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>The effectiveness of aquatic macrophytes in reducing runoff- and spray-drift-induced azinphos-methyl (AZP) input was compared in a vegetated stream. Water, sediment and plant samples were taken at increasing distances from a point of input during a spray-drift event and two runoff (10 and 22 mm/day) events. Peak concentrations of AZP decreased significantly ( R 2 = 0.99; p &lt; 0.0001; n = 5) from 0.24 μg/l to 0.11 μg/l during the 10 mm runoff event. No reduction took place during the 22 mm event. AZP concentrations were reduced by 90% following spray-drift input, with peak concentrations decreasing significantly ( R 2 = 0.93; p = 0.0084; n = 5) from 4.3 μg/l to 1.7 μg/l with increasing distance from the point of input. Plant samples taken after the spray-drift event showed increased AZP concentrations in comparison to before the event indicating sorption of the pesticide to the macrophytes. Although peak concentrations of AZP were as effectively mitigated during the 10 mm runoff event as during the spray-drift event, predictive modelling revealed that maximum concentrations expected during a worst-case scenario 10 mm runoff event (0 days after application) are an order of magnitude lower than what can be expected for a worst-case spray-drift and 22 mm runoff event, suggesting that spray-drift-derived pesticide concentrations are more effectively mitigated than those of runoff.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16002124</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-6535
ispartof Chemosphere (Oxford), 2006, Vol.62 (2), p.204-212
issn 0045-6535
1879-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292536
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural runoff
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Applied sciences
Azinphos-methyl
Azinphosmethyl - analysis
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biological and medical sciences
Continental surface waters
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
environmental fate
Exact sciences and technology
Fresh Water - chemistry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geologic Sediments - chemistry
insecticide residues
macrophytes
Magnoliopsida - growth & development
Mitigation
Natural water pollution
Pollution
pollution control
Pollution, environment geology
Runoff
Soil and water pollution
Soil science
sorption
Spray-drift
streams
Vegetation
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Water Movements
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
water pollution
Water treatment and pollution
title Mitigation of azinphos-methyl in a vegetated stream: Comparison of runoff- and spray-drift
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T08%3A17%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20azinphos-methyl%20in%20a%20vegetated%20stream:%20Comparison%20of%20runoff-%20and%20spray-drift&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Dabrowski,%20J.M.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=204-212&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19292536%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-3063da2d00099ff7c46eaa02d1dcfbe844efba24db8330151fd9f551dc5c32c03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19292536&rft_id=info:pmid/16002124&rfr_iscdi=true