Loading…

A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008

The objective of this study was to verify previous reports of activity with gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. Eligibility included a Zubrod performance status from 0 to 2, no prior gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine therap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2006-09, Vol.107 (6), p.1273-1279
Main Authors: STADLER, Walter M, HALABI, Susan, RINI, Brian, ERNSTOFF, Marc S, DAVILA, Enrique, PICUS, Joel, BARRIER, Robert, SMALL, Eric J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b90e04400e9c19162e7db915be0d85f74ffcd80f0c156e8266d94029088a3c403
container_end_page 1279
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1273
container_title Cancer
container_volume 107
creator STADLER, Walter M
HALABI, Susan
RINI, Brian
ERNSTOFF, Marc S
DAVILA, Enrique
PICUS, Joel
BARRIER, Robert
SMALL, Eric J
description The objective of this study was to verify previous reports of activity with gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. Eligibility included a Zubrod performance status from 0 to 2, no prior gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine therapy, and normal organ function. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine at a dose of 830 mg/m2 twice daily on Days 1 through 21 on a 28-day cycle with specified dose reductions for baseline renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the response rate, which was assessed every 8 weeks. The statistical plan tested the hypothesis that the response rate was 5% versus an alternative of 15%. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 4 of those patients never started treatment. Of the 56 evaluable patients, 79% of patients underwent prior nephrectomy, 75% of patients received prior systemic therapy, and 75% of patients had clear cell histology. Risk stratification revealed that 34%, 43%, and 16% of patients were in Risk Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Toxicity (graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) included Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 45% of patients, Grade 2 or greater fatigue in 32% of patients, Grade 2 or greater nausea in 29% of patients, Grade 2 or greater hand-foot reaction in 39% of patients, and Grade 2 or greater diarrhea in 22% of patients. Six patients responded (11%; 95% confidence interval, 4-22%), and the overall median survival was 14.5 months. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had modest activity in patients with metastatic renal cancer, although the degree of activity and its associated toxicity would not support further evaluation in a Phase III trial of unselected patients. More focused investigations to identify patients most likely to benefit or to enhance activity with additional agents would be reasonable.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.22117
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19292769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b90e04400e9c19162e7db915be0d85f74ffcd80f0c156e8266d94029088a3c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68QdILnoQqpM0_Yi3dfFjYcGLgreSptM12i-T9ODdH27rFj0N8_LwzvAQcsrgigHwa91oe8U5Y8kemTOQSQBM8H0yB4A0iET4OiNHzr0Pa8Kj8JDMWCxBCh7PyfeSdm_KIV2vqfN98UXbkm6x1sar3DRIVVNQrTr8C0xDa_TKeeWNphYbVQ1Ao9HSG7ocgq61fmyZwrGgwv4Da6Po1rZ9R29pZ1vf6raicvzxmByUqnJ4Ms0Febm_e149Bpunh_VquQl0CJEPcgkIQgCg1EyymGNS5JJFOUKRRmUiylIXKZSgWRRjyuO4kAK4hDRVoRYQLsjFrnc4_9mj81ltnMaqUg22vcuY5JInsRzAyx2obeucxTLrrKmV_coYZKPzbHSe_Tof4LOptc9rLP7RSfIAnE-AclpVpR3EGPfPpSBlKEX4Az9GiMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19292769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008</title><source>Wiley</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>STADLER, Walter M ; HALABI, Susan ; RINI, Brian ; ERNSTOFF, Marc S ; DAVILA, Enrique ; PICUS, Joel ; BARRIER, Robert ; SMALL, Eric J</creator><creatorcontrib>STADLER, Walter M ; HALABI, Susan ; RINI, Brian ; ERNSTOFF, Marc S ; DAVILA, Enrique ; PICUS, Joel ; BARRIER, Robert ; SMALL, Eric J ; Cancer and Leukemia Group B ; for Cancer and Leukemia Group B</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to verify previous reports of activity with gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. Eligibility included a Zubrod performance status from 0 to 2, no prior gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine therapy, and normal organ function. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine at a dose of 830 mg/m2 twice daily on Days 1 through 21 on a 28-day cycle with specified dose reductions for baseline renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the response rate, which was assessed every 8 weeks. The statistical plan tested the hypothesis that the response rate was 5% versus an alternative of 15%. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 4 of those patients never started treatment. Of the 56 evaluable patients, 79% of patients underwent prior nephrectomy, 75% of patients received prior systemic therapy, and 75% of patients had clear cell histology. Risk stratification revealed that 34%, 43%, and 16% of patients were in Risk Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Toxicity (graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) included Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 45% of patients, Grade 2 or greater fatigue in 32% of patients, Grade 2 or greater nausea in 29% of patients, Grade 2 or greater hand-foot reaction in 39% of patients, and Grade 2 or greater diarrhea in 22% of patients. Six patients responded (11%; 95% confidence interval, 4-22%), and the overall median survival was 14.5 months. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had modest activity in patients with metastatic renal cancer, although the degree of activity and its associated toxicity would not support further evaluation in a Phase III trial of unselected patients. More focused investigations to identify patients most likely to benefit or to enhance activity with additional agents would be reasonable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16909426</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Wiley-Liss</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Capecitabine ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidneys ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Tumors of the urinary system</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2006-09, Vol.107 (6), p.1273-1279</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2006 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b90e04400e9c19162e7db915be0d85f74ffcd80f0c156e8266d94029088a3c403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18099394$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16909426$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STADLER, Walter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALABI, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINI, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERNSTOFF, Marc S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVILA, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICUS, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRIER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMALL, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancer and Leukemia Group B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for Cancer and Leukemia Group B</creatorcontrib><title>A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to verify previous reports of activity with gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. Eligibility included a Zubrod performance status from 0 to 2, no prior gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine therapy, and normal organ function. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine at a dose of 830 mg/m2 twice daily on Days 1 through 21 on a 28-day cycle with specified dose reductions for baseline renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the response rate, which was assessed every 8 weeks. The statistical plan tested the hypothesis that the response rate was 5% versus an alternative of 15%. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 4 of those patients never started treatment. Of the 56 evaluable patients, 79% of patients underwent prior nephrectomy, 75% of patients received prior systemic therapy, and 75% of patients had clear cell histology. Risk stratification revealed that 34%, 43%, and 16% of patients were in Risk Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Toxicity (graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) included Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 45% of patients, Grade 2 or greater fatigue in 32% of patients, Grade 2 or greater nausea in 29% of patients, Grade 2 or greater hand-foot reaction in 39% of patients, and Grade 2 or greater diarrhea in 22% of patients. Six patients responded (11%; 95% confidence interval, 4-22%), and the overall median survival was 14.5 months. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had modest activity in patients with metastatic renal cancer, although the degree of activity and its associated toxicity would not support further evaluation in a Phase III trial of unselected patients. More focused investigations to identify patients most likely to benefit or to enhance activity with additional agents would be reasonable.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capecitabine</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68QdILnoQqpM0_Yi3dfFjYcGLgreSptM12i-T9ODdH27rFj0N8_LwzvAQcsrgigHwa91oe8U5Y8kemTOQSQBM8H0yB4A0iET4OiNHzr0Pa8Kj8JDMWCxBCh7PyfeSdm_KIV2vqfN98UXbkm6x1sar3DRIVVNQrTr8C0xDa_TKeeWNphYbVQ1Ao9HSG7ocgq61fmyZwrGgwv4Da6Po1rZ9R29pZ1vf6raicvzxmByUqnJ4Ms0Febm_e149Bpunh_VquQl0CJEPcgkIQgCg1EyymGNS5JJFOUKRRmUiylIXKZSgWRRjyuO4kAK4hDRVoRYQLsjFrnc4_9mj81ltnMaqUg22vcuY5JInsRzAyx2obeucxTLrrKmV_coYZKPzbHSe_Tof4LOptc9rLP7RSfIAnE-AclpVpR3EGPfPpSBlKEX4Az9GiMI</recordid><startdate>20060915</startdate><enddate>20060915</enddate><creator>STADLER, Walter M</creator><creator>HALABI, Susan</creator><creator>RINI, Brian</creator><creator>ERNSTOFF, Marc S</creator><creator>DAVILA, Enrique</creator><creator>PICUS, Joel</creator><creator>BARRIER, Robert</creator><creator>SMALL, Eric J</creator><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060915</creationdate><title>A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008</title><author>STADLER, Walter M ; HALABI, Susan ; RINI, Brian ; ERNSTOFF, Marc S ; DAVILA, Enrique ; PICUS, Joel ; BARRIER, Robert ; SMALL, Eric J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b90e04400e9c19162e7db915be0d85f74ffcd80f0c156e8266d94029088a3c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capecitabine</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STADLER, Walter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALABI, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINI, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERNSTOFF, Marc S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVILA, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICUS, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRIER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMALL, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancer and Leukemia Group B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for Cancer and Leukemia Group B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STADLER, Walter M</au><au>HALABI, Susan</au><au>RINI, Brian</au><au>ERNSTOFF, Marc S</au><au>DAVILA, Enrique</au><au>PICUS, Joel</au><au>BARRIER, Robert</au><au>SMALL, Eric J</au><aucorp>Cancer and Leukemia Group B</aucorp><aucorp>for Cancer and Leukemia Group B</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2006-09-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1273</spage><epage>1279</epage><pages>1273-1279</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>The objective of this study was to verify previous reports of activity with gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. Eligibility included a Zubrod performance status from 0 to 2, no prior gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidine therapy, and normal organ function. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine at a dose of 830 mg/m2 twice daily on Days 1 through 21 on a 28-day cycle with specified dose reductions for baseline renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the response rate, which was assessed every 8 weeks. The statistical plan tested the hypothesis that the response rate was 5% versus an alternative of 15%. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 4 of those patients never started treatment. Of the 56 evaluable patients, 79% of patients underwent prior nephrectomy, 75% of patients received prior systemic therapy, and 75% of patients had clear cell histology. Risk stratification revealed that 34%, 43%, and 16% of patients were in Risk Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Toxicity (graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) included Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 45% of patients, Grade 2 or greater fatigue in 32% of patients, Grade 2 or greater nausea in 29% of patients, Grade 2 or greater hand-foot reaction in 39% of patients, and Grade 2 or greater diarrhea in 22% of patients. Six patients responded (11%; 95% confidence interval, 4-22%), and the overall median survival was 14.5 months. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine had modest activity in patients with metastatic renal cancer, although the degree of activity and its associated toxicity would not support further evaluation in a Phase III trial of unselected patients. More focused investigations to identify patients most likely to benefit or to enhance activity with additional agents would be reasonable.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Wiley-Liss</pub><pmid>16909426</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.22117</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2006-09, Vol.107 (6), p.1273-1279
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19292769
source Wiley; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Capecitabine
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology
Deoxycytidine - administration & dosage
Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Fluorouracil - analogs & derivatives
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Kidneys
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Tumors of the urinary system
title A phase II study of gemcitabine and capecitabine in metastatic renal cancer : A report of cancer and leukemia group B protocol 90008
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20phase%20II%20study%20of%20gemcitabine%20and%20capecitabine%20in%20metastatic%20renal%20cancer%20:%20A%20report%20of%20cancer%20and%20leukemia%20group%20B%20protocol%2090008&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=STADLER,%20Walter%20M&rft.aucorp=Cancer%20and%20Leukemia%20Group%20B&rft.date=2006-09-15&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1273&rft.epage=1279&rft.pages=1273-1279&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.22117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19292769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b90e04400e9c19162e7db915be0d85f74ffcd80f0c156e8266d94029088a3c403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19292769&rft_id=info:pmid/16909426&rfr_iscdi=true