Loading…

PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures

Ancient monumental masonry buildings are complex structures that were not based on an engineered design, underwent many transformations during their life and often present lack of connections among the structural elements. Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry structures and,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2015-01, Vol.13 (1), p.13-47
Main Authors: Lagomarsino, Sergio, Cattari, Serena
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 13
creator Lagomarsino, Sergio
Cattari, Serena
description Ancient monumental masonry buildings are complex structures that were not based on an engineered design, underwent many transformations during their life and often present lack of connections among the structural elements. Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry structures and, in order to reduce their vulnerability with compatible and light interventions, it is necessary to have accurate models for the seismic analysis, able to simulate the nonlinear behavior of masonry, and a well defined performance-based assessment procedure, aimed to guarantee the acceptable level of risk for the occupants and for the conservation of the monument itself. The paper outlines the guidelines that were developed within the PERPETUATE European research project. The wide variety of architectural assets is classified and the related proper modeling strategies are identified; moreover, immovable artistic assets are considered in the assessment. A displacement-based approach is adopted, because these structures crack even for low intensity earthquakes and can survive severe ones only if they have a sufficient displacement capacity. Safety and conservation requirements are proposed by considering distinct sets of performance levels, related to use and safety of people, conservation of the building and of the artistic assets that might be present. Some indications on the seismic hazard assessment are provided, considering the distinctive features of some types of ancient structures. Within the fundamental knowledge phase, sensitivity analysis is proposed in order to address and optimize the in-situ investigation and to define proper confidence factors, aimed to consider epistemic and statistical uncertainties. Different modeling approaches and methods of analysis are considered, depending on the characteristics of the structure; both static pushover and incremental dynamic nonlinear analyses are considered. Related verification procedures are defined to evaluate the seismic intensity measure, and the corresponding return period, which is compatible with each performance level that must be fulfilled.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1929473984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3527316791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhoeQQJM0P6A3Qy-9OJXGnvH4GMKmDSw0lF3IzXi88nbCfGytmUP-fZ1sDqUQepKEnlcgnqL4hHCNAOYrI1TYSEAtbW20xJPiHCujJOqqPn3tQZoaHz8UF8xPAGVlLJwX8WH182G12d5sVmK_dDvqu5FYxCkJpo6HLogDpTwOfgwkW8-0E56ZmAcaZzFFEZZ-XpLvxS9K3ez3JAbP05ieBc9pCXlH_LE4i75nunqrl8X2brW5_S7XP77d396spdemmmVb2oC63LUWWrCxKUErA2jRV6axqg1KK7-LgYw2uo1lwNaDxdDU0aOCqC6LL8e7hzT9XohnN3QcqO_9SNPCDm1ptVG20f9H6xqgaUCZjH7-B32aljTmRzKlamWVLlWm8EiFNDEniu6QusGnZ4fgXiS5oySXJbkXSQ5zpjxmOLPjntJfl98N_QGCiZR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1636393423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lagomarsino, Sergio ; Cattari, Serena</creator><creatorcontrib>Lagomarsino, Sergio ; Cattari, Serena</creatorcontrib><description>Ancient monumental masonry buildings are complex structures that were not based on an engineered design, underwent many transformations during their life and often present lack of connections among the structural elements. Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry structures and, in order to reduce their vulnerability with compatible and light interventions, it is necessary to have accurate models for the seismic analysis, able to simulate the nonlinear behavior of masonry, and a well defined performance-based assessment procedure, aimed to guarantee the acceptable level of risk for the occupants and for the conservation of the monument itself. The paper outlines the guidelines that were developed within the PERPETUATE European research project. The wide variety of architectural assets is classified and the related proper modeling strategies are identified; moreover, immovable artistic assets are considered in the assessment. A displacement-based approach is adopted, because these structures crack even for low intensity earthquakes and can survive severe ones only if they have a sufficient displacement capacity. Safety and conservation requirements are proposed by considering distinct sets of performance levels, related to use and safety of people, conservation of the building and of the artistic assets that might be present. Some indications on the seismic hazard assessment are provided, considering the distinctive features of some types of ancient structures. Within the fundamental knowledge phase, sensitivity analysis is proposed in order to address and optimize the in-situ investigation and to define proper confidence factors, aimed to consider epistemic and statistical uncertainties. Different modeling approaches and methods of analysis are considered, depending on the characteristics of the structure; both static pushover and incremental dynamic nonlinear analyses are considered. Related verification procedures are defined to evaluate the seismic intensity measure, and the corresponding return period, which is compatible with each performance level that must be fulfilled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Civil Engineering ; Confidence intervals ; Conservation ; Displacement ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Guidelines ; Hydrogeology ; Masonry ; Memorials &amp; monuments ; Nonlinearity ; Original Research Paper ; Research projects ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic phenomena ; Sensitivity analysis ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2015-01, Vol.13 (1), p.13-47</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lagomarsino, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattari, Serena</creatorcontrib><title>PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>Ancient monumental masonry buildings are complex structures that were not based on an engineered design, underwent many transformations during their life and often present lack of connections among the structural elements. Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry structures and, in order to reduce their vulnerability with compatible and light interventions, it is necessary to have accurate models for the seismic analysis, able to simulate the nonlinear behavior of masonry, and a well defined performance-based assessment procedure, aimed to guarantee the acceptable level of risk for the occupants and for the conservation of the monument itself. The paper outlines the guidelines that were developed within the PERPETUATE European research project. The wide variety of architectural assets is classified and the related proper modeling strategies are identified; moreover, immovable artistic assets are considered in the assessment. A displacement-based approach is adopted, because these structures crack even for low intensity earthquakes and can survive severe ones only if they have a sufficient displacement capacity. Safety and conservation requirements are proposed by considering distinct sets of performance levels, related to use and safety of people, conservation of the building and of the artistic assets that might be present. Some indications on the seismic hazard assessment are provided, considering the distinctive features of some types of ancient structures. Within the fundamental knowledge phase, sensitivity analysis is proposed in order to address and optimize the in-situ investigation and to define proper confidence factors, aimed to consider epistemic and statistical uncertainties. Different modeling approaches and methods of analysis are considered, depending on the characteristics of the structure; both static pushover and incremental dynamic nonlinear analyses are considered. Related verification procedures are defined to evaluate the seismic intensity measure, and the corresponding return period, which is compatible with each performance level that must be fulfilled.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Memorials &amp; monuments</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1rHDEMhoeQQJM0P6A3Qy-9OJXGnvH4GMKmDSw0lF3IzXi88nbCfGytmUP-fZ1sDqUQepKEnlcgnqL4hHCNAOYrI1TYSEAtbW20xJPiHCujJOqqPn3tQZoaHz8UF8xPAGVlLJwX8WH182G12d5sVmK_dDvqu5FYxCkJpo6HLogDpTwOfgwkW8-0E56ZmAcaZzFFEZZ-XpLvxS9K3ez3JAbP05ieBc9pCXlH_LE4i75nunqrl8X2brW5_S7XP77d396spdemmmVb2oC63LUWWrCxKUErA2jRV6axqg1KK7-LgYw2uo1lwNaDxdDU0aOCqC6LL8e7hzT9XohnN3QcqO_9SNPCDm1ptVG20f9H6xqgaUCZjH7-B32aljTmRzKlamWVLlWm8EiFNDEniu6QusGnZ4fgXiS5oySXJbkXSQ5zpjxmOLPjntJfl98N_QGCiZR0</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Lagomarsino, Sergio</creator><creator>Cattari, Serena</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures</title><author>Lagomarsino, Sergio ; Cattari, Serena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Memorials &amp; monuments</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lagomarsino, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattari, Serena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lagomarsino, Sergio</au><au>Cattari, Serena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>13-47</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>Ancient monumental masonry buildings are complex structures that were not based on an engineered design, underwent many transformations during their life and often present lack of connections among the structural elements. Earthquakes are the main cause of damage for ancient masonry structures and, in order to reduce their vulnerability with compatible and light interventions, it is necessary to have accurate models for the seismic analysis, able to simulate the nonlinear behavior of masonry, and a well defined performance-based assessment procedure, aimed to guarantee the acceptable level of risk for the occupants and for the conservation of the monument itself. The paper outlines the guidelines that were developed within the PERPETUATE European research project. The wide variety of architectural assets is classified and the related proper modeling strategies are identified; moreover, immovable artistic assets are considered in the assessment. A displacement-based approach is adopted, because these structures crack even for low intensity earthquakes and can survive severe ones only if they have a sufficient displacement capacity. Safety and conservation requirements are proposed by considering distinct sets of performance levels, related to use and safety of people, conservation of the building and of the artistic assets that might be present. Some indications on the seismic hazard assessment are provided, considering the distinctive features of some types of ancient structures. Within the fundamental knowledge phase, sensitivity analysis is proposed in order to address and optimize the in-situ investigation and to define proper confidence factors, aimed to consider epistemic and statistical uncertainties. Different modeling approaches and methods of analysis are considered, depending on the characteristics of the structure; both static pushover and incremental dynamic nonlinear analyses are considered. Related verification procedures are defined to evaluate the seismic intensity measure, and the corresponding return period, which is compatible with each performance level that must be fulfilled.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2015-01, Vol.13 (1), p.13-47
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1929473984
source Springer Nature
subjects Assessments
Civil Engineering
Confidence intervals
Conservation
Displacement
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquakes
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Guidelines
Hydrogeology
Masonry
Memorials & monuments
Nonlinearity
Original Research Paper
Research projects
Seismic activity
Seismic engineering
Seismic hazard
Seismic phenomena
Sensitivity analysis
Structural Geology
title PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A54%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PERPETUATE%20guidelines%20for%20seismic%20performance-based%20assessment%20of%20cultural%20heritage%20masonry%20structures&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Lagomarsino,%20Sergio&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=13-47&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3527316791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-b29c142db90b09f8204370191a57893bc343adfce7474bf2c1ba091c86fa130f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1636393423&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true