Loading…

Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem

Effects of 17 α-ethinylestradiol (EE) on phytoplankton were investigated in a lentic freshwater microcosm study. Treatment with EE caused a shift in the species composition as shown by a principle response curve. Whereas densities of Cyanophyceae, Dinophyceae, and Chrysophyceae increased, those of C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 2008-03, Vol.69 (3), p.453-465
Main Authors: Hense, Burkhard A., Jaser, Wolfgang, Welzl, Gerhard, Pfister, Gerd, Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F., Schramm, Karl-Werner
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643
container_end_page 465
container_issue 3
container_start_page 453
container_title Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
container_volume 69
creator Hense, Burkhard A.
Jaser, Wolfgang
Welzl, Gerhard
Pfister, Gerd
Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F.
Schramm, Karl-Werner
description Effects of 17 α-ethinylestradiol (EE) on phytoplankton were investigated in a lentic freshwater microcosm study. Treatment with EE caused a shift in the species composition as shown by a principle response curve. Whereas densities of Cyanophyceae, Dinophyceae, and Chrysophyceae increased, those of Conjugatophyceae and Cryptophyceae decreased. Furthermore, relative density of Chlorophyceae declined after EE treatment. The changes showed taxa-specific time dependencies. Some species, especially the cyanobacterium Cyanobium parvum, bloomed after the treatment. EE treatment promoted total abundance and biomass of phytoplankton. Although the number of species per microcosm increased, the diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener, Simpson) tended to lower values. The ecosystem only partly recovered during the investigated post-treatment period of 6 weeks. Probably at least the main effects were caused indirectly, i.e. via decrease of grazing zooplankton (crustaceans). The relation of EE to variation of phytoplankton composition was closer than those of other abiotic factors, indicating the relevance of its impact. EE also probably affected nutrients of the phytoplankton.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.01.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19301753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147651307000322</els_id><sourcerecordid>19301753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGKFDEQhoMoOK6-gYecvPVY1Ul3pj0IsrjuwIIg6zlk0tVMxu6kTbK7zM2H0AfxRfYh9klM74hHoSCkUv9X-fkZe42wRsD27WFNNpC_XdcAag1YSj5hK4QOqlqifMpWpaOqtkHxnL1I6QAAAppmxX5tp9nYzMPAUfH73xXlvfPHkVKOpndh5MHzvCc-j8Z_y-XiPB8ipf2dyRT55GwMNqQpPfz4ud2-418ozcEnSgty3h9z-Kc0vn9EOV-UkUaTXeneuWXj40NxkY4p0_SSPRvMmOjV3_OMfb34eH1-WV19_rQ9_3BVWSFUrgTWO9mC6mDXWiU2SrSo1IawAyMUtVQjdg1K7Adom65HIMC-2UmSG6xbKc7YmxN3juH7TfGsJ5csjeXHFG6Sxk4AqkaUQXkaLG5TijToObrJxKNG0EsG-qBPGeglAw1YauG_P8momLh1FHWyjryl3kWyWffB_R_wByqolT0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19301753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Hense, Burkhard A. ; Jaser, Wolfgang ; Welzl, Gerhard ; Pfister, Gerd ; Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F. ; Schramm, Karl-Werner</creator><creatorcontrib>Hense, Burkhard A. ; Jaser, Wolfgang ; Welzl, Gerhard ; Pfister, Gerd ; Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F. ; Schramm, Karl-Werner</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of 17 α-ethinylestradiol (EE) on phytoplankton were investigated in a lentic freshwater microcosm study. Treatment with EE caused a shift in the species composition as shown by a principle response curve. Whereas densities of Cyanophyceae, Dinophyceae, and Chrysophyceae increased, those of Conjugatophyceae and Cryptophyceae decreased. Furthermore, relative density of Chlorophyceae declined after EE treatment. The changes showed taxa-specific time dependencies. Some species, especially the cyanobacterium Cyanobium parvum, bloomed after the treatment. EE treatment promoted total abundance and biomass of phytoplankton. Although the number of species per microcosm increased, the diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener, Simpson) tended to lower values. The ecosystem only partly recovered during the investigated post-treatment period of 6 weeks. Probably at least the main effects were caused indirectly, i.e. via decrease of grazing zooplankton (crustaceans). The relation of EE to variation of phytoplankton composition was closer than those of other abiotic factors, indicating the relevance of its impact. EE also probably affected nutrients of the phytoplankton.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-6513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.01.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>17 α-ethinylestradiol ; Aquatic microcosms ; Chlorophyceae ; Chrysophyceae ; Conjugatophyceae ; Cryptophyceae ; Cyanobium ; Cyanophyceae ; Cyanophyta ; Dinophyceae ; Freshwater ; Indirect effects ; Phytoplankton</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2008-03, Vol.69 (3), p.453-465</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651307000322$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3547,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hense, Burkhard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaser, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzl, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Karl-Werner</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem</title><title>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</title><description>Effects of 17 α-ethinylestradiol (EE) on phytoplankton were investigated in a lentic freshwater microcosm study. Treatment with EE caused a shift in the species composition as shown by a principle response curve. Whereas densities of Cyanophyceae, Dinophyceae, and Chrysophyceae increased, those of Conjugatophyceae and Cryptophyceae decreased. Furthermore, relative density of Chlorophyceae declined after EE treatment. The changes showed taxa-specific time dependencies. Some species, especially the cyanobacterium Cyanobium parvum, bloomed after the treatment. EE treatment promoted total abundance and biomass of phytoplankton. Although the number of species per microcosm increased, the diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener, Simpson) tended to lower values. The ecosystem only partly recovered during the investigated post-treatment period of 6 weeks. Probably at least the main effects were caused indirectly, i.e. via decrease of grazing zooplankton (crustaceans). The relation of EE to variation of phytoplankton composition was closer than those of other abiotic factors, indicating the relevance of its impact. EE also probably affected nutrients of the phytoplankton.</description><subject>17 α-ethinylestradiol</subject><subject>Aquatic microcosms</subject><subject>Chlorophyceae</subject><subject>Chrysophyceae</subject><subject>Conjugatophyceae</subject><subject>Cryptophyceae</subject><subject>Cyanobium</subject><subject>Cyanophyceae</subject><subject>Cyanophyta</subject><subject>Dinophyceae</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Indirect effects</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><issn>0147-6513</issn><issn>1090-2414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcGKFDEQhoMoOK6-gYecvPVY1Ul3pj0IsrjuwIIg6zlk0tVMxu6kTbK7zM2H0AfxRfYh9klM74hHoSCkUv9X-fkZe42wRsD27WFNNpC_XdcAag1YSj5hK4QOqlqifMpWpaOqtkHxnL1I6QAAAppmxX5tp9nYzMPAUfH73xXlvfPHkVKOpndh5MHzvCc-j8Z_y-XiPB8ipf2dyRT55GwMNqQpPfz4ud2-418ozcEnSgty3h9z-Kc0vn9EOV-UkUaTXeneuWXj40NxkY4p0_SSPRvMmOjV3_OMfb34eH1-WV19_rQ9_3BVWSFUrgTWO9mC6mDXWiU2SrSo1IawAyMUtVQjdg1K7Adom65HIMC-2UmSG6xbKc7YmxN3juH7TfGsJ5csjeXHFG6Sxk4AqkaUQXkaLG5TijToObrJxKNG0EsG-qBPGeglAw1YauG_P8momLh1FHWyjryl3kWyWffB_R_wByqolT0</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Hense, Burkhard A.</creator><creator>Jaser, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Welzl, Gerhard</creator><creator>Pfister, Gerd</creator><creator>Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F.</creator><creator>Schramm, Karl-Werner</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem</title><author>Hense, Burkhard A. ; Jaser, Wolfgang ; Welzl, Gerhard ; Pfister, Gerd ; Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F. ; Schramm, Karl-Werner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>17 α-ethinylestradiol</topic><topic>Aquatic microcosms</topic><topic>Chlorophyceae</topic><topic>Chrysophyceae</topic><topic>Conjugatophyceae</topic><topic>Cryptophyceae</topic><topic>Cyanobium</topic><topic>Cyanophyceae</topic><topic>Cyanophyta</topic><topic>Dinophyceae</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Indirect effects</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hense, Burkhard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaser, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzl, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Karl-Werner</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hense, Burkhard A.</au><au>Jaser, Wolfgang</au><au>Welzl, Gerhard</au><au>Pfister, Gerd</au><au>Wöhler-Moorhoff, Gabriele F.</au><au>Schramm, Karl-Werner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</jtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>453-465</pages><issn>0147-6513</issn><eissn>1090-2414</eissn><abstract>Effects of 17 α-ethinylestradiol (EE) on phytoplankton were investigated in a lentic freshwater microcosm study. Treatment with EE caused a shift in the species composition as shown by a principle response curve. Whereas densities of Cyanophyceae, Dinophyceae, and Chrysophyceae increased, those of Conjugatophyceae and Cryptophyceae decreased. Furthermore, relative density of Chlorophyceae declined after EE treatment. The changes showed taxa-specific time dependencies. Some species, especially the cyanobacterium Cyanobium parvum, bloomed after the treatment. EE treatment promoted total abundance and biomass of phytoplankton. Although the number of species per microcosm increased, the diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener, Simpson) tended to lower values. The ecosystem only partly recovered during the investigated post-treatment period of 6 weeks. Probably at least the main effects were caused indirectly, i.e. via decrease of grazing zooplankton (crustaceans). The relation of EE to variation of phytoplankton composition was closer than those of other abiotic factors, indicating the relevance of its impact. EE also probably affected nutrients of the phytoplankton.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.01.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-6513
ispartof Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2008-03, Vol.69 (3), p.453-465
issn 0147-6513
1090-2414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19301753
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect®
subjects 17 α-ethinylestradiol
Aquatic microcosms
Chlorophyceae
Chrysophyceae
Conjugatophyceae
Cryptophyceae
Cyanobium
Cyanophyceae
Cyanophyta
Dinophyceae
Freshwater
Indirect effects
Phytoplankton
title Impact of 17 α-ethinylestradiol on the plankton in freshwater microcosms—II: Responses of phytoplankton and the interrelation within the ecosystem
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%2017%20%CE%B1-ethinylestradiol%20on%20the%20plankton%20in%20freshwater%20microcosms%E2%80%94II:%20Responses%20of%20phytoplankton%20and%20the%20interrelation%20within%20the%20ecosystem&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20and%20environmental%20safety&rft.au=Hense,%20Burkhard%20A.&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=453-465&rft.issn=0147-6513&rft.eissn=1090-2414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19301753%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-312b460790b6c7387361778e190a37e6e21195141df0659d10e01d5b4e4812643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19301753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true