Loading…

Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces

Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive science 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415
Main Authors: Rahaman, Jeenath, Agrawal, Harshit, Srivastava, Nisheeth, Chandrasekharan, Sanjay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213
container_end_page 415
container_issue 2
container_start_page 370
container_title Cognitive science
container_volume 42
creator Rahaman, Jeenath
Agrawal, Harshit
Srivastava, Nisheeth
Chandrasekharan, Sanjay
description Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cogs.12518
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933229831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1172742</ericid><sourcerecordid>1933229831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9vFCEcxYnR2G314l1D4qVpnPoFhvnhrdls15pqjdUzYeG7K80Ms4WZtutfL9Npe_AgF8L3fXgP8gh5w-CYpfXRdJt4zLhk1TMyY1KyrCihfk5mIIo8A87EHtmP8QoAikLUL8ker6pcSs5m5M8PNF27cl77ni68Nr3r_Cf6VXu3HRrduxuMdIkeg-6RfsNb-j10Bu0Q0tx52v9GetbqTTIYb36gqx1d3PXorfMbqr2ljwHj-eTenl5utcH4irxY6ybi64f9gPw6Xfycf87OL5Zn85PzzORMVllhgEElobYcAVbGgMwLXueVLPgapLVclHldaSFLXUqjbQ6Ma7BclhKL9PkDcjj5bkN3PWDsVeuiwabRHrshKlYLwXldiRF9_w961Q3Bp9cpDkyUya4uE3U0USZ0MQZcq21wrQ47xUCNjaixEXXfSILfPVgOqxbtE_pYQQLeTgAGZ57kxRfGSl7mPOls0m9dg7v_RKn5xfJyCv0LtJ6eMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013762197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-0213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28845521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Cognitive ability ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer applications ; Distributed cognition ; Embedding ; Enactive cognition ; Epistemic action ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Forward models ; Geometric Concepts ; Humans ; Imagination - physiology ; Learning - physiology ; Learning Processes ; Male ; Manipulative Materials ; Manipulatives ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics - methods ; Mathematics education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Object Manipulation ; Problem Solving ; Problem Solving - physiology ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Transfer</subject><ispartof>Cognitive science, 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1172742$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28845521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Harshit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><title>Cognitive science</title><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Distributed cognition</subject><subject>Embedding</subject><subject>Enactive cognition</subject><subject>Epistemic action</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forward models</subject><subject>Geometric Concepts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination - physiology</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulative Materials</subject><subject>Manipulatives</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics - methods</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Object Manipulation</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Problem Solving - physiology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Transfer</subject><issn>0364-0213</issn><issn>1551-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9vFCEcxYnR2G314l1D4qVpnPoFhvnhrdls15pqjdUzYeG7K80Ms4WZtutfL9Npe_AgF8L3fXgP8gh5w-CYpfXRdJt4zLhk1TMyY1KyrCihfk5mIIo8A87EHtmP8QoAikLUL8ker6pcSs5m5M8PNF27cl77ni68Nr3r_Cf6VXu3HRrduxuMdIkeg-6RfsNb-j10Bu0Q0tx52v9GetbqTTIYb36gqx1d3PXorfMbqr2ljwHj-eTenl5utcH4irxY6ybi64f9gPw6Xfycf87OL5Zn85PzzORMVllhgEElobYcAVbGgMwLXueVLPgapLVclHldaSFLXUqjbQ6Ma7BclhKL9PkDcjj5bkN3PWDsVeuiwabRHrshKlYLwXldiRF9_w961Q3Bp9cpDkyUya4uE3U0USZ0MQZcq21wrQ47xUCNjaixEXXfSILfPVgOqxbtE_pYQQLeTgAGZ57kxRfGSl7mPOls0m9dg7v_RKn5xfJyCv0LtJ6eMA</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Rahaman, Jeenath</creator><creator>Agrawal, Harshit</creator><creator>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creator><creator>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><author>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Distributed cognition</topic><topic>Embedding</topic><topic>Enactive cognition</topic><topic>Epistemic action</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forward models</topic><topic>Geometric Concepts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination - physiology</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulative Materials</topic><topic>Manipulatives</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics - methods</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Object Manipulation</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Problem Solving - physiology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Harshit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahaman, Jeenath</au><au>Agrawal, Harshit</au><au>Srivastava, Nisheeth</au><au>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1172742</ericid><atitle>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>370-415</pages><issn>0364-0213</issn><eissn>1551-6709</eissn><abstract>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>28845521</pmid><doi>10.1111/cogs.12518</doi><tpages>46</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-0213
ispartof Cognitive science, 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415
issn 0364-0213
1551-6709
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933229831
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Adolescent
Child
Cognitive ability
Comparative Analysis
Computer applications
Distributed cognition
Embedding
Enactive cognition
Epistemic action
Eye Movements
Eye Movements - physiology
Female
Forward models
Geometric Concepts
Humans
Imagination - physiology
Learning - physiology
Learning Processes
Male
Manipulative Materials
Manipulatives
Mathematical models
Mathematics - methods
Mathematics education
Mathematics Instruction
Object Manipulation
Problem Solving
Problem Solving - physiology
Students
Teaching Methods
Transfer
title Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recombinant%20Enaction:%20Manipulatives%20Generate%20New%20Procedures%20in%20the%20Imagination,%20by%20Extending%20and%20Recombining%20Action%20Spaces&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20science&rft.au=Rahaman,%20Jeenath&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=370-415&rft.issn=0364-0213&rft.eissn=1551-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cogs.12518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933229831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013762197&rft_id=info:pmid/28845521&rft_ericid=EJ1172742&rfr_iscdi=true