Loading…
Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces
Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cognitive science 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213 |
container_end_page | 415 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 370 |
container_title | Cognitive science |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Rahaman, Jeenath Agrawal, Harshit Srivastava, Nisheeth Chandrasekharan, Sanjay |
description | Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cogs.12518 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933229831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1172742</ericid><sourcerecordid>1933229831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9vFCEcxYnR2G314l1D4qVpnPoFhvnhrdls15pqjdUzYeG7K80Ms4WZtutfL9Npe_AgF8L3fXgP8gh5w-CYpfXRdJt4zLhk1TMyY1KyrCihfk5mIIo8A87EHtmP8QoAikLUL8ker6pcSs5m5M8PNF27cl77ni68Nr3r_Cf6VXu3HRrduxuMdIkeg-6RfsNb-j10Bu0Q0tx52v9GetbqTTIYb36gqx1d3PXorfMbqr2ljwHj-eTenl5utcH4irxY6ybi64f9gPw6Xfycf87OL5Zn85PzzORMVllhgEElobYcAVbGgMwLXueVLPgapLVclHldaSFLXUqjbQ6Ma7BclhKL9PkDcjj5bkN3PWDsVeuiwabRHrshKlYLwXldiRF9_w961Q3Bp9cpDkyUya4uE3U0USZ0MQZcq21wrQ47xUCNjaixEXXfSILfPVgOqxbtE_pYQQLeTgAGZ57kxRfGSl7mPOls0m9dg7v_RKn5xfJyCv0LtJ6eMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013762197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-0213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28845521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Cognitive ability ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer applications ; Distributed cognition ; Embedding ; Enactive cognition ; Epistemic action ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Forward models ; Geometric Concepts ; Humans ; Imagination - physiology ; Learning - physiology ; Learning Processes ; Male ; Manipulative Materials ; Manipulatives ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics - methods ; Mathematics education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Object Manipulation ; Problem Solving ; Problem Solving - physiology ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Transfer</subject><ispartof>Cognitive science, 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1172742$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28845521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Harshit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><title>Cognitive science</title><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Distributed cognition</subject><subject>Embedding</subject><subject>Enactive cognition</subject><subject>Epistemic action</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forward models</subject><subject>Geometric Concepts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination - physiology</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulative Materials</subject><subject>Manipulatives</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics - methods</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Object Manipulation</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Problem Solving - physiology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Transfer</subject><issn>0364-0213</issn><issn>1551-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9vFCEcxYnR2G314l1D4qVpnPoFhvnhrdls15pqjdUzYeG7K80Ms4WZtutfL9Npe_AgF8L3fXgP8gh5w-CYpfXRdJt4zLhk1TMyY1KyrCihfk5mIIo8A87EHtmP8QoAikLUL8ker6pcSs5m5M8PNF27cl77ni68Nr3r_Cf6VXu3HRrduxuMdIkeg-6RfsNb-j10Bu0Q0tx52v9GetbqTTIYb36gqx1d3PXorfMbqr2ljwHj-eTenl5utcH4irxY6ybi64f9gPw6Xfycf87OL5Zn85PzzORMVllhgEElobYcAVbGgMwLXueVLPgapLVclHldaSFLXUqjbQ6Ma7BclhKL9PkDcjj5bkN3PWDsVeuiwabRHrshKlYLwXldiRF9_w961Q3Bp9cpDkyUya4uE3U0USZ0MQZcq21wrQ47xUCNjaixEXXfSILfPVgOqxbtE_pYQQLeTgAGZ57kxRfGSl7mPOls0m9dg7v_RKn5xfJyCv0LtJ6eMA</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Rahaman, Jeenath</creator><creator>Agrawal, Harshit</creator><creator>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creator><creator>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</title><author>Rahaman, Jeenath ; Agrawal, Harshit ; Srivastava, Nisheeth ; Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Distributed cognition</topic><topic>Embedding</topic><topic>Enactive cognition</topic><topic>Epistemic action</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forward models</topic><topic>Geometric Concepts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination - physiology</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulative Materials</topic><topic>Manipulatives</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics - methods</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Object Manipulation</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Problem Solving - physiology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahaman, Jeenath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Harshit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Nisheeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahaman, Jeenath</au><au>Agrawal, Harshit</au><au>Srivastava, Nisheeth</au><au>Chandrasekharan, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1172742</ericid><atitle>Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>370-415</pages><issn>0364-0213</issn><eissn>1551-6709</eissn><abstract>Manipulation of physical models such as tangrams and tiles is a popular approach to teaching early mathematics concepts. This pedagogical approach is extended by new computational media, where mathematical entities such as equations and vectors can be virtually manipulated. The cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting such manipulation‐based learning—particularly how actions generate new internal structures that support problem‐solving—are not understood. We develop a model of the way manipulations generate internal traces embedding actions, and how these action‐traces recombine during problem‐solving. This model is based on a study of two groups of sixth‐grade students solving area problems. Before problem‐solving, one group manipulated a tangram, the other group answered a descriptive test. Eye‐movement trajectories during problem‐solving were different between the groups. A second study showed that this difference required the tangram's geometrical structure, just manipulation was not enough. We propose a theoretical model accounting for these results, and discuss its implications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>28845521</pmid><doi>10.1111/cogs.12518</doi><tpages>46</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-0213 |
ispartof | Cognitive science, 2018-03, Vol.42 (2), p.370-415 |
issn | 0364-0213 1551-6709 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1933229831 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Adolescent Child Cognitive ability Comparative Analysis Computer applications Distributed cognition Embedding Enactive cognition Epistemic action Eye Movements Eye Movements - physiology Female Forward models Geometric Concepts Humans Imagination - physiology Learning - physiology Learning Processes Male Manipulative Materials Manipulatives Mathematical models Mathematics - methods Mathematics education Mathematics Instruction Object Manipulation Problem Solving Problem Solving - physiology Students Teaching Methods Transfer |
title | Recombinant Enaction: Manipulatives Generate New Procedures in the Imagination, by Extending and Recombining Action Spaces |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recombinant%20Enaction:%20Manipulatives%20Generate%20New%20Procedures%20in%20the%20Imagination,%20by%20Extending%20and%20Recombining%20Action%20Spaces&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20science&rft.au=Rahaman,%20Jeenath&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=370-415&rft.issn=0364-0213&rft.eissn=1551-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cogs.12518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933229831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4158-6c0108509d2e00bcc05462948562f05dd237498a357a75cad4012a0d2575e6213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013762197&rft_id=info:pmid/28845521&rft_ericid=EJ1172742&rfr_iscdi=true |