Loading…

NEED FOR SPECIES-SPECIFIC MODELS FOR BODY-COMPOSITION ESTIMATES OF SMALL MAMMALS USING EM-SCAN registered

We evaluated the accuracy in using the Small Animal Composition Analyzer (EM-SCAN registered , Model SA-2) for estimating body composition of live meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). To investigate the necessity for a species-specific calibration equation, we compared the average error in estima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mammalogy 2001-05, Vol.82 (2), p.527-534
Main Authors: Unangst, Edward T, Wunder, Bruce A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluated the accuracy in using the Small Animal Composition Analyzer (EM-SCAN registered , Model SA-2) for estimating body composition of live meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). To investigate the necessity for a species-specific calibration equation, we compared the average error in estimates of lipid mass using meadow vole data in calibration equations derived for meadow voles in this study to equations derived for prairie voles (very similar in size and shape to meadow voles) and to those provided by the manufacturer. Analyses using a complete data set (n = 27 voles) and 2 subsets representing 'lean' voles (n = 16) and 'fat' voles (n = 11) were performed. The equation derived for meadow voles more accurately estimated lipid mass than the other equations with an average error of 1.55 g compared to 3.64 g using the prairie-vole equation and 4.73 g with the manufacturer equation, supporting the need for a species-specific equation even with species of very similar size and morphology.
ISSN:0022-2372
1545-1542
DOI:10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0527:NFSSMF>2.0.CO;2