Loading…

Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith

The regolith at the Apollo 16 landing site, the only Apollo landing site in the central lunar highlands, contains material derived from a number of sources. A model that accounts for the introduction of basin ejecta and mixing of the megaregolith is used to estimate the abundance of basin material i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets 2006-09, Vol.111 (E9)
Main Authors: Petro, N E, Pieters, C M
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue E9
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets
container_volume 111
creator Petro, N E
Pieters, C M
description The regolith at the Apollo 16 landing site, the only Apollo landing site in the central lunar highlands, contains material derived from a number of sources. A model that accounts for the introduction of basin ejecta and mixing of the megaregolith is used to estimate the abundance of basin material in the Apollo 16 regolith. Megaregolith mixing model estimates of the abundance of primary ejecta from the Imbrium, Serenitatis, and Nectaris basins are found to be present in roughly equal (8-10%) proportions. Additionally, the presence of mare-derived material in the Apollo 16 regolith suggests that a significant component of the regolith (15-23%) is derived from lateral transport. There are inherent difficulties in directly comparing model results with ground truth at Apollo 16. Results suggest shallower mixing during ejecta emplacement than predicted by Oberbeck et al. (1975).
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2005JE002559,2006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19348817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19348817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_193488173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sKwjAURLNQsGg_wF1WrqzemyZ9LEUqIrhzX0q9fUhMatP6_RbxA5zNcIYzjK0Rdggi3QsAdckAhFLpdoJoxjxAmQQgRLxgvnMPmCJVJAE9hld7J92amg8N8a63bzKFKYnb6rscOqu15Rjxnmqr26FZsXlVaEf-r5dsc8pux3MwnV8juSF_tq4krQtDdnQ5pqFMEozDv8UPmSw7Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19348817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Petro, N E ; Pieters, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Petro, N E ; Pieters, C M</creatorcontrib><description>The regolith at the Apollo 16 landing site, the only Apollo landing site in the central lunar highlands, contains material derived from a number of sources. A model that accounts for the introduction of basin ejecta and mixing of the megaregolith is used to estimate the abundance of basin material in the Apollo 16 regolith. Megaregolith mixing model estimates of the abundance of primary ejecta from the Imbrium, Serenitatis, and Nectaris basins are found to be present in roughly equal (8-10%) proportions. Additionally, the presence of mare-derived material in the Apollo 16 regolith suggests that a significant component of the regolith (15-23%) is derived from lateral transport. There are inherent difficulties in directly comparing model results with ground truth at Apollo 16. Results suggest shallower mixing during ejecta emplacement than predicted by Oberbeck et al. (1975).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005JE002559,2006</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets, 2006-09, Vol.111 (E9)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petro, N E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets</title><description>The regolith at the Apollo 16 landing site, the only Apollo landing site in the central lunar highlands, contains material derived from a number of sources. A model that accounts for the introduction of basin ejecta and mixing of the megaregolith is used to estimate the abundance of basin material in the Apollo 16 regolith. Megaregolith mixing model estimates of the abundance of primary ejecta from the Imbrium, Serenitatis, and Nectaris basins are found to be present in roughly equal (8-10%) proportions. Additionally, the presence of mare-derived material in the Apollo 16 regolith suggests that a significant component of the regolith (15-23%) is derived from lateral transport. There are inherent difficulties in directly comparing model results with ground truth at Apollo 16. Results suggest shallower mixing during ejecta emplacement than predicted by Oberbeck et al. (1975).</description><issn>0148-0227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi8sKwjAURLNQsGg_wF1WrqzemyZ9LEUqIrhzX0q9fUhMatP6_RbxA5zNcIYzjK0Rdggi3QsAdckAhFLpdoJoxjxAmQQgRLxgvnMPmCJVJAE9hld7J92amg8N8a63bzKFKYnb6rscOqu15Rjxnmqr26FZsXlVaEf-r5dsc8pux3MwnV8juSF_tq4krQtDdnQ5pqFMEozDv8UPmSw7Ng</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Petro, N E</creator><creator>Pieters, C M</creator><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith</title><author>Petro, N E ; Pieters, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_193488173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petro, N E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petro, N E</au><au>Pieters, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>E9</issue><issn>0148-0227</issn><abstract>The regolith at the Apollo 16 landing site, the only Apollo landing site in the central lunar highlands, contains material derived from a number of sources. A model that accounts for the introduction of basin ejecta and mixing of the megaregolith is used to estimate the abundance of basin material in the Apollo 16 regolith. Megaregolith mixing model estimates of the abundance of primary ejecta from the Imbrium, Serenitatis, and Nectaris basins are found to be present in roughly equal (8-10%) proportions. Additionally, the presence of mare-derived material in the Apollo 16 regolith suggests that a significant component of the regolith (15-23%) is derived from lateral transport. There are inherent difficulties in directly comparing model results with ground truth at Apollo 16. Results suggest shallower mixing during ejecta emplacement than predicted by Oberbeck et al. (1975).</abstract><doi>10.1029/2005JE002559,2006</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. E. Planets, 2006-09, Vol.111 (E9)
issn 0148-0227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19348817
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
title Modeling the provenance of the Apollo 16 regolith
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20the%20provenance%20of%20the%20Apollo%2016%20regolith&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20E.%20Planets&rft.au=Petro,%20N%20E&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=E9&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005JE002559,2006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E19348817%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_193488173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19348817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true