Phase separation and microbial distribution in the hyperthermophilic-mesophilic-type temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of waste activated sludge (WAS)

• Published in: Bioresource technology 2017-12, Vol.245 (Pt A), p.401-410
• Main Authors: Qin, Yu, Higashimori, Atsushi, Wu, Li-Jie, Hojo, Toshimasa, Kubota, Kengo, Li, Yu-You
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anaerobic digestion; Anaerobiosis; Archaea; Bioreactors; Euryarchaeota; Hyperthermophilic; Microbial community; Sewage; Temperature; Temperature phased; Waste activated sludge; Waste Disposal, Fluid
• ISSN: 0960-8524; 1873-2976
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.124

•The mechanism of the TPAD system changed with the temperature combinations.•VS removals were enhanced by 8% for TM-TPAD and by 14.5% for HM-TPAD.•The microbial structures in both stages of conventional TPAD were similar.•Distinct microbial communities were found between stages in the HM-TPAD.•Maintaining at 70°C is an effective measure to achieve phase separation. In order to investigate the phase separation and microbial distribution in the TPAD, the conventional thermophilic-mesophilic type (TM-TPAD) and the hyperthermophilic-mesophilic type (HM-TPAD) were operated with a single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD) as control. HM-TPAD accomplished the volatile solids destruction 14.5% higher than MAD. Calculating conversion efficiencies distinguished the separation of acidogenic and methanogenic phases in HM-TPAD, which was not found in TM-TPAD. The differences on microbial distributions also reflected the phase separation in HM-TPAD. The protein degraders, Coprothermobacter had higher abundance in the first stage than the second stage of HM-TPAD but it had similar abundance between the two stages of TM-TPAD. Also, the archaeal communities from the two stages of HM-TPAD shared the least similarity but those from the two stages of TM-TPAD were closely similar.