Hydraulics and salinity profile of pitcher irrigation in saline water condition

• Published in: Agricultural water management 2008-10, Vol.95 (10), p.1129-1134
• Main Authors: Naik, B.S., Panda, R.K., Nayak, S.C., Sharma, S.D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; Flow behaviour; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General agronomy. Plant production; Irrigation. Drainage; Pitcher base material; Pitcher irrigation; Pitcher irrigation Flow behaviour Soil moisture distribution Pitcher base material Wetting front advance Salt distribution; Salt distribution; Soil moisture distribution; Wetting front advance
• ISSN: 0378-3774; 1873-2283
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.04.010

The hydraulics of pitcher irrigation in saline water condition was studied in laboratory conditions in terms of flow behaviour of pitcher, soil moisture distribution, wetting front advance and distribution of salt concentration in the soil using different pitcher making materials. The Pitcher Type 1 (PT1) made up of local soil and sand yielded the lowest mean hourly depletion ranging from 0.42 to 0.62% depending on salinity of the water used. It was followed by PT2 made up of local soil, sand and resinous material with a mean hourly depletion of 0.51–0.69% and PT3 with local soil, saw dust and sand with a mean hourly depletion of 0.91–1.02%. In all cases, with the increase in salinity level of the water used (ranging from 5 to 20 dS/m), the depletion rate and moisture content in the soil profile were found to decrease. Similarly, it was found that PT1 yielded the lowest wetting front advance and salt movement followed by PT2 and PT3. It was observed that the wetting front advance in the soil decreased with increasing salinity level of the water. The salt concentration in the soil was minimum near the pitcher and maximum at the soil surface and periphery of the wetted zone. In case of PT1, the maximum salt concentration in the soil profile ranged between 1.09 and 3.88 dS/m using water with a salinity ranging from 5 to 20 dS/m, respectively. Similarly, for PT2 the maximum salt concentration in the soil profile also ranged from 1.09 to 3.88 dS/m and for PT3 from 2.30 to 6.07 dS/m. A paired t-test revealed that the moisture as well as the salt distribution of PT3 differed significantly from PT1 and PT2 at α = 0.05. Even, if the salt concentration remained the same and the moisture content remained within field capacity for PT1 and PT2, PT1 is preferred in comparison to PT2 and PT3 as the pitcher material of PT1 is locally economically available.