Loading…

Minimal important difference of target lobar volume reduction after endobronchial valve treatment for emphysema

ABSTRACT Background and objective Target lobar volume reduction (TLVR) is an important efficacy outcome measure for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) treatment using one‐way endobronchial valves (EBV) in patients with severe emphysema. The commonly used cut‐off value for TLVR that expresses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Vic.), 2018-03, Vol.23 (3), p.306-310
Main Authors: Welling, Jorrit B.A., Hartman, Jorine E., van Rikxoort, Eva M., Ten Hacken, Nick H.T., Kerstjens, Huib A.M., Klooster, Karin, Slebos, Dirk‐Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Background and objective Target lobar volume reduction (TLVR) is an important efficacy outcome measure for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) treatment using one‐way endobronchial valves (EBV) in patients with severe emphysema. The commonly used cut‐off value for TLVR that expresses a perceivable clinical benefit is −350 mL. However, a scientifically determined minimal important difference (MID) for TLVR never has been published. The objective of the present study was to determine the MID for TLVR on HRCT in patients who were treated with EBV. Methods A total of 318 patients with severe emphysema from two BLVR trials were analysed. Anchor‐based methods were used to define the TLVR MID at 6 months follow‐up. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), residual volume (RV) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were used as anchors. Results The calculated TLVR MID with each anchor was: FEV1 −587 mL, RV −534 mL and SGRQ −560 mL. The combined MID (average of the three anchor‐based MIDs) was −563 mL. Conclusion Using the anchor‐based method, we established a TLVR MID of −563 mL in patients with severe emphysema at 6 months follow‐up after EBV treatment. This value can be useful for both interpreting the results from trials and clinical practice, as well as for designing future studies on lung volume reduction. See related Editorial The minimal important difference (MID) for target lobar volume reduction after endobronchial valve treatment for emphysema is −563 mL. This MID can be useful for both interpreting the results from trials and clinical practice, as well as for designing future studies on lung volume reduction.
ISSN:1323-7799
1440-1843
DOI:10.1111/resp.13178