Loading…
The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production
Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clu...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 587 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 576 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Ackerman, Joshua T. Eadie, John M. Loughman, Daniel L. Yarris, Gregory S. McLandress, M. Robert |
description | Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3802715 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19400786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3802715</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3802715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgCs4pfoUgXp6qJ5c27aN2XgYD9zDBt5ImqevMmpk0D357OzYQBOHAgcOPP-cchM4J3FIG4o7lQAVJD9CIFEwkNCfiEI0AKE1STt6P0UkIKwBGSJ6N0MNiafC0a2w0nTLYNXgufd9Ki0sbe7XEE7PxRsu-dR0eahLVp227Dzz3Tke1HZ-io0baYM72fYzenh4X5Usye32elvezRDEOfUIzEDWXKqVMCmA1ZJw3RZFxrbVSWa5NXRvJiBZqcFma1nXNUqKYKYZDGGVjdL3L3Xj3FU3oq3UblLFWdsbFUJGCA4g8G-DFH7hy0XfDbhVlnBAhChjQzQ4p70Lwpqk2vl1L_10RqLaPrPaPHOTVPk4GJW3jZafa8MtTAC7Edr_LnVuF3vl_434A30t7SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234117790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3802715</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Anas platyrhynchos ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Aquatic birds ; Atmospheric pollution ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Clutch size ; Combustion and energy production ; Demecology ; Ducklings ; Ducks ; Eggs ; Exact sciences and technology ; Female animals ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Nesting ; Nests ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Predation ; Predators ; Strepera ; Vertebrata ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jul 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3802715$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3802715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15004772$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughman, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarris, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Anas platyrhynchos</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Combustion and energy production</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ducklings</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Strepera</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgCs4pfoUgXp6qJ5c27aN2XgYD9zDBt5ImqevMmpk0D357OzYQBOHAgcOPP-cchM4J3FIG4o7lQAVJD9CIFEwkNCfiEI0AKE1STt6P0UkIKwBGSJ6N0MNiafC0a2w0nTLYNXgufd9Ki0sbe7XEE7PxRsu-dR0eahLVp227Dzz3Tke1HZ-io0baYM72fYzenh4X5Usye32elvezRDEOfUIzEDWXKqVMCmA1ZJw3RZFxrbVSWa5NXRvJiBZqcFma1nXNUqKYKYZDGGVjdL3L3Xj3FU3oq3UblLFWdsbFUJGCA4g8G-DFH7hy0XfDbhVlnBAhChjQzQ4p70Lwpqk2vl1L_10RqLaPrPaPHOTVPk4GJW3jZafa8MtTAC7Edr_LnVuF3vl_434A30t7SQ</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creator><creator>Eadie, John M.</creator><creator>Loughman, Daniel L.</creator><creator>Yarris, Gregory S.</creator><creator>McLandress, M. Robert</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><author>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Anas platyrhynchos</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Combustion and energy production</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ducklings</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Strepera</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughman, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarris, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerman, Joshua T.</au><au>Eadie, John M.</au><au>Loughman, Daniel L.</au><au>Yarris, Gregory S.</au><au>McLandress, M. Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>576-587</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3802715</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19400786 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Anas Anas platyrhynchos Animal and plant ecology Animal nesting Animal populations Animal reproduction Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied sciences Aquatic birds Atmospheric pollution Aves Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Clutch size Combustion and energy production Demecology Ducklings Ducks Eggs Exact sciences and technology Female animals Females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Nesting Nests Pollution Pollution sources. Measurement results Predation Predators Strepera Vertebrata Waterfowl Wildfowl Wildlife management |
title | The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Partial%20Clutch%20Depredation%20on%20Duckling%20Production&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Ackerman,%20Joshua%20T.&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=576-587&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3802715&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3802715%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234117790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3802715&rfr_iscdi=true |