Loading…

The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production

Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587
Main Authors: Ackerman, Joshua T., Eadie, John M., Loughman, Daniel L., Yarris, Gregory S., McLandress, M. Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323
cites
container_end_page 587
container_issue 3
container_start_page 576
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 67
creator Ackerman, Joshua T.
Eadie, John M.
Loughman, Daniel L.
Yarris, Gregory S.
McLandress, M. Robert
description Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3802715
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19400786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3802715</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3802715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgCs4pfoUgXp6qJ5c27aN2XgYD9zDBt5ImqevMmpk0D357OzYQBOHAgcOPP-cchM4J3FIG4o7lQAVJD9CIFEwkNCfiEI0AKE1STt6P0UkIKwBGSJ6N0MNiafC0a2w0nTLYNXgufd9Ki0sbe7XEE7PxRsu-dR0eahLVp227Dzz3Tke1HZ-io0baYM72fYzenh4X5Usye32elvezRDEOfUIzEDWXKqVMCmA1ZJw3RZFxrbVSWa5NXRvJiBZqcFma1nXNUqKYKYZDGGVjdL3L3Xj3FU3oq3UblLFWdsbFUJGCA4g8G-DFH7hy0XfDbhVlnBAhChjQzQ4p70Lwpqk2vl1L_10RqLaPrPaPHOTVPk4GJW3jZafa8MtTAC7Edr_LnVuF3vl_434A30t7SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234117790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3802715</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Anas platyrhynchos ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Aquatic birds ; Atmospheric pollution ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Clutch size ; Combustion and energy production ; Demecology ; Ducklings ; Ducks ; Eggs ; Exact sciences and technology ; Female animals ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Nesting ; Nests ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Predation ; Predators ; Strepera ; Vertebrata ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jul 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3802715$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3802715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15004772$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughman, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarris, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Anas platyrhynchos</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Combustion and energy production</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ducklings</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Strepera</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgCs4pfoUgXp6qJ5c27aN2XgYD9zDBt5ImqevMmpk0D357OzYQBOHAgcOPP-cchM4J3FIG4o7lQAVJD9CIFEwkNCfiEI0AKE1STt6P0UkIKwBGSJ6N0MNiafC0a2w0nTLYNXgufd9Ki0sbe7XEE7PxRsu-dR0eahLVp227Dzz3Tke1HZ-io0baYM72fYzenh4X5Usye32elvezRDEOfUIzEDWXKqVMCmA1ZJw3RZFxrbVSWa5NXRvJiBZqcFma1nXNUqKYKYZDGGVjdL3L3Xj3FU3oq3UblLFWdsbFUJGCA4g8G-DFH7hy0XfDbhVlnBAhChjQzQ4p70Lwpqk2vl1L_10RqLaPrPaPHOTVPk4GJW3jZafa8MtTAC7Edr_LnVuF3vl_434A30t7SQ</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creator><creator>Eadie, John M.</creator><creator>Loughman, Daniel L.</creator><creator>Yarris, Gregory S.</creator><creator>McLandress, M. Robert</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</title><author>Ackerman, Joshua T. ; Eadie, John M. ; Loughman, Daniel L. ; Yarris, Gregory S. ; McLandress, M. Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Anas platyrhynchos</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Combustion and energy production</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ducklings</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Strepera</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Joshua T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eadie, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughman, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarris, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLandress, M. Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerman, Joshua T.</au><au>Eadie, John M.</au><au>Loughman, Daniel L.</au><au>Yarris, Gregory S.</au><au>McLandress, M. Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>576-587</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Nest depredation is the foremost cause of reproductive failure in waterfowl. Management strategies typically have focused on reducing predator contact with nests, yet the fate of nests after predators have found them has received little attention. Although nest depredation can result in complete clutch loss, nests often are only partially depredated and the remaining clutch may be successful. We investigated the prevalence of partial clutch depredation in dabbling ducks and assessed its influence on duckling production in the Suisun Marsh of California, USA, from 1998 to 2000. Partial clutch depredation by predators was common in all duck species and in all years. Overall, 37% of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 803), 37% of gadwall (A. strepera; n = 340), 22% of northern pintail (A. acuta; n = 46), 31% of cinnamon teal (A. cyanoptera; n = 16), and 1 of 2 northern shoveler nests (A. clypeata) were partially depredated. Of those nests experiencing a depredation event, 53% of mallard and 50% of gadwall nests were only partially depredated rather than completely destroyed. As a result of partial clutch depredation, total duckling production was reduced by 10% for mallards and 9% for gadwalls. The female's decision to stay with or abandon the reduced clutch had an important influence on nest success. Mallard and gadwall females abandoned the nesting attempt after partial clutch depredation 37% and 32% of the time, respectively. However, 27% of partially depredated mallard nests and 23% of partially depredated gadwall nests were successful. Egg success was 0.60 ± 0.24 (mean ± SD) for mallards and 0.53 ± 0.23 for gadwall. From 1998 to 2000, 22% of mallard and 21% of gadwall ducklings produced in our study study area came from partially depredated nests. Although many duck nests experienced partial clutch loss, they nevertheless contributed substantially to overall duckling production. Incorporating an estimate of egg success, in addition to nest success, may provide a more accurate assessment of waterfowl management strategies.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3802715</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2003-07, Vol.67 (3), p.576-587
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19400786
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Anas
Anas platyrhynchos
Animal and plant ecology
Animal nesting
Animal populations
Animal reproduction
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied sciences
Aquatic birds
Atmospheric pollution
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Clutch size
Combustion and energy production
Demecology
Ducklings
Ducks
Eggs
Exact sciences and technology
Female animals
Females
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Nesting
Nests
Pollution
Pollution sources. Measurement results
Predation
Predators
Strepera
Vertebrata
Waterfowl
Wildfowl
Wildlife management
title The Influence of Partial Clutch Depredation on Duckling Production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Partial%20Clutch%20Depredation%20on%20Duckling%20Production&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Ackerman,%20Joshua%20T.&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=576-587&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3802715&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3802715%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-2607b4ac523a703b0644f9964dddcc68debbea31d7c7b4655bbb351c3e9193323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234117790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3802715&rfr_iscdi=true