Loading…
Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks
Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8‐year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology letters 2017-10, Vol.20 (10), p.1261-1272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3 |
container_end_page | 1272 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1261 |
container_title | Ecology letters |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Ponisio, Lauren C. Gaiarsa, Marilia P. Kremen, Claire Gravel, Dominique |
description | Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8‐year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites in an agricultural landscape. We find that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganisations. The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their network positions, contrary to what preferential attachment – the most widely studied theory of ecological network assembly – predicts. Instead, we suggest assembly occurs via an opportunistic attachment process. Our results contribute to our understanding of how communities assembly and how species interactions change through time while helping to inform efforts to reassemble robust communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.12821 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940190106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1939818174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgitXqwheQATe6mDYnmUtmI0ipFyh004W7IZNJcGrmYpKhdOc7-IY-idGpXQhmk3D48nP4EboAPAF_plLLCRBG4ACdQJRAiEnEDvdv-jxCp9auMQaSpXCMRoRlBFicnqDbZde1xvVNZV0lAu4cFy-1bFzArZV1oaUNOs0b9_n-0bVaVw13rQka6TatebVn6EhxbeX57h6j1f18NXsMF8uHp9ndIhSUMQhVQbNYxWWKGUk4K8pSCUyTVFCSCgDhRzHDikcsiQrJIU7LTFHq_yoZxQUdo-shtjPtWy-ty-vKCqn9YrLtbQ5ZhCHDgBNPr_7Qddubxi_nFc0YMEgjr24GJUxrrZEq70xVc7PNAeffnea-0_ynU28vd4l9UctyL39L9GA6gE2l5fb_pHy-mA-RX6FYgTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939818174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Ponisio, Lauren C. ; Gaiarsa, Marilia P. ; Kremen, Claire ; Gravel, Dominique</creator><contributor>Gravel, Dominique</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ponisio, Lauren C. ; Gaiarsa, Marilia P. ; Kremen, Claire ; Gravel, Dominique ; Gravel, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8‐year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites in an agricultural landscape. We find that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganisations. The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their network positions, contrary to what preferential attachment – the most widely studied theory of ecological network assembly – predicts. Instead, we suggest assembly occurs via an opportunistic attachment process. Our results contribute to our understanding of how communities assembly and how species interactions change through time while helping to inform efforts to reassemble robust communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.12821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28921857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Attachment ; Change points ; community assembly ; Community ecology ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecosystem ; Indigenous plants ; Landscape ; modularity ; mutualism ; nestedness ; Plant communities ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; preferential attachment ; Restoration ; robustness ; Species</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2017-10, Vol.20 (10), p.1261-1272</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gravel, Dominique</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ponisio, Lauren C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaiarsa, Marilia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravel, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8‐year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites in an agricultural landscape. We find that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganisations. The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their network positions, contrary to what preferential attachment – the most widely studied theory of ecological network assembly – predicts. Instead, we suggest assembly occurs via an opportunistic attachment process. Our results contribute to our understanding of how communities assembly and how species interactions change through time while helping to inform efforts to reassemble robust communities.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Change points</subject><subject>community assembly</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>modularity</subject><subject>mutualism</subject><subject>nestedness</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>preferential attachment</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>robustness</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgitXqwheQATe6mDYnmUtmI0ipFyh004W7IZNJcGrmYpKhdOc7-IY-idGpXQhmk3D48nP4EboAPAF_plLLCRBG4ACdQJRAiEnEDvdv-jxCp9auMQaSpXCMRoRlBFicnqDbZde1xvVNZV0lAu4cFy-1bFzArZV1oaUNOs0b9_n-0bVaVw13rQka6TatebVn6EhxbeX57h6j1f18NXsMF8uHp9ndIhSUMQhVQbNYxWWKGUk4K8pSCUyTVFCSCgDhRzHDikcsiQrJIU7LTFHq_yoZxQUdo-shtjPtWy-ty-vKCqn9YrLtbQ5ZhCHDgBNPr_7Qddubxi_nFc0YMEgjr24GJUxrrZEq70xVc7PNAeffnea-0_ynU28vd4l9UctyL39L9GA6gE2l5fb_pHy-mA-RX6FYgTo</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Ponisio, Lauren C.</creator><creator>Gaiarsa, Marilia P.</creator><creator>Kremen, Claire</creator><creator>Gravel, Dominique</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks</title><author>Ponisio, Lauren C. ; Gaiarsa, Marilia P. ; Kremen, Claire ; Gravel, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Change points</topic><topic>community assembly</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>modularity</topic><topic>mutualism</topic><topic>nestedness</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>preferential attachment</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>robustness</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ponisio, Lauren C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaiarsa, Marilia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravel, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ponisio, Lauren C.</au><au>Gaiarsa, Marilia P.</au><au>Kremen, Claire</au><au>Gravel, Dominique</au><au>Gravel, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1261</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1261-1272</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8‐year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites in an agricultural landscape. We find that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganisations. The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their network positions, contrary to what preferential attachment – the most widely studied theory of ecological network assembly – predicts. Instead, we suggest assembly occurs via an opportunistic attachment process. Our results contribute to our understanding of how communities assembly and how species interactions change through time while helping to inform efforts to reassemble robust communities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28921857</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.12821</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
ispartof | Ecology letters, 2017-10, Vol.20 (10), p.1261-1272 |
issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1940190106 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Agricultural land Agriculture Attachment Change points community assembly Community ecology Ecological monitoring Ecosystem Indigenous plants Landscape modularity mutualism nestedness Plant communities Plant reproduction Plants Pollination Pollinators preferential attachment Restoration robustness Species |
title | Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opportunistic%20attachment%20assembles%20plant%E2%80%93pollinator%20networks&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Ponisio,%20Lauren%20C.&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1261&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1261-1272&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.12821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1939818174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-fb395f5d70826a8bddfc0367c327c11ca8b580fa4864bea157d9f33388fe45b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939818174&rft_id=info:pmid/28921857&rfr_iscdi=true |