Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2017-12, Vol.26 (12), p.2078-2085
• Main Authors: Kilian, Christopher M., Press, Cyrus M., Smith, Kevin M., O'Connor, Daniel P., Morris, Brent J., Elkousy, Hussein A., Gartsman, Gary M., Edwards, T. Bradley
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; component loosening; Female; Follow-Up Studies; glenohumeral arthritis; Glenoid Cavity - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; keel; Male; Middle Aged; osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis - surgery; peg; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Radiography; Range of Motion, Articular; reconstruction; Reoperation; replacement; Shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology; Shoulder Joint - surgery; Shoulder Prosthesis - adverse effects; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.016

Glenoid component loosening remains a significant issue after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Pegged glenoid components have shown better lucency rates than keeled components in the short term; however, midterm to long-term results have not fully been determined. We previously reported early outcomes of the current randomized controlled group of patients, with higher glenoid lucency rates in those with a keeled glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these components at minimum 5-year follow-up. Fifty-nine total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to receive either a pegged or keeled glenoid component. Three raters graded radiographic glenoid lucencies. Clinical outcome scores and active mobility outcomes were collected preoperatively and at yearly postoperative appointments. Of the 46 shoulders meeting the inclusion criteria, 38 (82.6%) were available for minimum 5-year radiographic follow-up. After an average of 7.9 years, radiographic lucency was present in 100% of pegged and 91% of keeled components (P = .617). Grade 4 or 5 lucency was present in 44% of pegged and 36% of keeled components (P = .743). There were no differences in clinical outcome scores or active mobility outcomes between shoulders with pegged and keeled components at last follow-up. Within the initial cohort, 20% of the keeled shoulders (6 of 30) and 7% of the pegged shoulders (2 of 29) underwent revision surgery (P = .263). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in survival rates between groups (P = .560). At an average 7.9-year follow-up, non-ingrowth, all-polyethylene pegged glenoid implants are equivalent to keeled implants with respect to radiolucency, clinical outcomes, and need for revision surgery.