Loading…

SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS

Coastal restoration strategies in the Mississippi River Delta Plain include use of direct sediment additions as well as river diversions to reintroduce fresh water and sediments into coastal marshes. Often, these diversions are located in the upper parts of the coastal basins, where fresh water floa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2007-12, Vol.27 (4), p.1016-1024
Main Authors: Carpenter, Kate, Sasser, Charles E., Visser, Jenneke M., DeLaune, Ronald D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3
container_end_page 1024
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1016
container_title Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)
container_volume 27
creator Carpenter, Kate
Sasser, Charles E.
Visser, Jenneke M.
DeLaune, Ronald D.
description Coastal restoration strategies in the Mississippi River Delta Plain include use of direct sediment additions as well as river diversions to reintroduce fresh water and sediments into coastal marshes. Often, these diversions are located in the upper parts of the coastal basins, where fresh water floating marshes predominate. Floating marshes are wetlands of emergent vascular vegetation that have a significant mat of live and dead roots, dead organic material, and mineral sediments. Mats move vertically as ambient water levels rise and fall. As such, extensive water exchange is maintained below the mat, while overland sheet flow is reduced or eliminated, limiting inorganic sediment input. Thus, the effect of sediment introduction into floating marsh wetlands is unknown. In this study, we documented marsh mat response to Mississippi River sediment addition and measured change in soil properties, species composition change, and growth of vegetation. The study included two sites located in seasonally floating thin-mat marshes dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis baldwinii). At each site, 16 plots were established. Each 1 m2 plot was randomly assigned one of four treatments: none, low, medium, and high sediment additions, with the highest sediment addition representing approximately 15 years of deposition from an existing river diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. With increasing sediment addition, significant increases in bulk density, and significant decreases in percent organic matter in the top 25 cm of the marsh mat were observed. Most of the sediment added remained in the top 10 cm of the marsh mat. No significant differences in water level over the mat were found among treatments, indicating that buoyancy was not affected by sediment addition. Aboveground biomass tended to increase with sediment addition, although the differences were not statistically significant. Belowground biomass was not significantly affected by the addition of sediment. These results indicate that sediment additions at the level supplied by existing diversion structures should not sink floating marsh mats and may have slight positive effects on vegetation biomass.
doi_str_mv 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1016:SIIAFF]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19403280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19403280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkVFr2zAUhcVYoVm731DBYGxQZ9K1LDvdk-rIjcGxguUwyhjCju0tJY07q3nYv6-Myx72uBcJoe-cezkHoTklc8pD-EIgDL0AKHwCQsLPEH6nhPIbnaYiSX7AnMxj9RXeoBldMN_jwPhbNPsrOkfvrH0gTgFAZ-iXlst0LfMSp_lmO56lwgInmRJlmt_hpJB69U2UssBrUejVDZZJIuNSY5VjrdIMbwq1kUWZSn2Nb7fqXuTx_TUW-RJvMuF8b1O1FlpforOuOtj2_et9gbaJLOOVl6m7NBaZV7GAPXtBTZqQdazhhHHogqbd-bRmTQvQ-AxYxHacMkaiqKHuCQFroo7ztqtCSru69i_Qx8n3aeh_n1r7bB73dtceDtWx7U_WuFCIDxFx4Id_wIf-NBzdbgYWQIBGEfiOSiZqN_TWDm1nnob9YzX8MZSYsQ4zJmvGZM1Yh4HQjHWYqQ7j_k2sDDijq8moq3pT_Rz21mw1EOoTEjFG_YUjlhNR7_v-2P7voBd9FJN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920218823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Carpenter, Kate ; Sasser, Charles E. ; Visser, Jenneke M. ; DeLaune, Ronald D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kate ; Sasser, Charles E. ; Visser, Jenneke M. ; DeLaune, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal restoration strategies in the Mississippi River Delta Plain include use of direct sediment additions as well as river diversions to reintroduce fresh water and sediments into coastal marshes. Often, these diversions are located in the upper parts of the coastal basins, where fresh water floating marshes predominate. Floating marshes are wetlands of emergent vascular vegetation that have a significant mat of live and dead roots, dead organic material, and mineral sediments. Mats move vertically as ambient water levels rise and fall. As such, extensive water exchange is maintained below the mat, while overland sheet flow is reduced or eliminated, limiting inorganic sediment input. Thus, the effect of sediment introduction into floating marsh wetlands is unknown. In this study, we documented marsh mat response to Mississippi River sediment addition and measured change in soil properties, species composition change, and growth of vegetation. The study included two sites located in seasonally floating thin-mat marshes dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis baldwinii). At each site, 16 plots were established. Each 1 m2 plot was randomly assigned one of four treatments: none, low, medium, and high sediment additions, with the highest sediment addition representing approximately 15 years of deposition from an existing river diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. With increasing sediment addition, significant increases in bulk density, and significant decreases in percent organic matter in the top 25 cm of the marsh mat were observed. Most of the sediment added remained in the top 10 cm of the marsh mat. No significant differences in water level over the mat were found among treatments, indicating that buoyancy was not affected by sediment addition. Aboveground biomass tended to increase with sediment addition, although the differences were not statistically significant. Belowground biomass was not significantly affected by the addition of sediment. These results indicate that sediment additions at the level supplied by existing diversion structures should not sink floating marsh mats and may have slight positive effects on vegetation biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1016:SIIAFF]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1313 Dolley Madison Boulevard, Suite 402, McLean, Virginia, USA 22101: The Society of Wetland Scientists</publisher><subject>aquatic plants ; Biomass ; Bulk density ; Buoyancy ; Coastal waters ; coasts ; delta soils ; deltas ; Diversion structures ; Eleocharis ; Eleocharis baldwinii ; floating marsh ; floating marshes ; Fluvial sediments ; Fresh water ; freshwater ; Louisiana ; Marshes ; Organic matter ; Plant biomass ; plant growth ; REGULAR SUBMISSIONS ; Restoration strategies ; Rivers ; sediment addition ; sediment deposition ; Sediments ; Soil erosion ; Soil properties ; Soils ; Species composition ; species diversity ; Statistical analysis ; Vegetation ; Vegetation effects ; vegetation mats ; Water exchange ; Water levels ; wetland plants ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2007-12, Vol.27 (4), p.1016-1024</ispartof><rights>The Society of Wetland Scientists</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2007.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasser, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Jenneke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLaune, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><title>SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>Coastal restoration strategies in the Mississippi River Delta Plain include use of direct sediment additions as well as river diversions to reintroduce fresh water and sediments into coastal marshes. Often, these diversions are located in the upper parts of the coastal basins, where fresh water floating marshes predominate. Floating marshes are wetlands of emergent vascular vegetation that have a significant mat of live and dead roots, dead organic material, and mineral sediments. Mats move vertically as ambient water levels rise and fall. As such, extensive water exchange is maintained below the mat, while overland sheet flow is reduced or eliminated, limiting inorganic sediment input. Thus, the effect of sediment introduction into floating marsh wetlands is unknown. In this study, we documented marsh mat response to Mississippi River sediment addition and measured change in soil properties, species composition change, and growth of vegetation. The study included two sites located in seasonally floating thin-mat marshes dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis baldwinii). At each site, 16 plots were established. Each 1 m2 plot was randomly assigned one of four treatments: none, low, medium, and high sediment additions, with the highest sediment addition representing approximately 15 years of deposition from an existing river diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. With increasing sediment addition, significant increases in bulk density, and significant decreases in percent organic matter in the top 25 cm of the marsh mat were observed. Most of the sediment added remained in the top 10 cm of the marsh mat. No significant differences in water level over the mat were found among treatments, indicating that buoyancy was not affected by sediment addition. Aboveground biomass tended to increase with sediment addition, although the differences were not statistically significant. Belowground biomass was not significantly affected by the addition of sediment. These results indicate that sediment additions at the level supplied by existing diversion structures should not sink floating marsh mats and may have slight positive effects on vegetation biomass.</description><subject>aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Buoyancy</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>coasts</subject><subject>delta soils</subject><subject>deltas</subject><subject>Diversion structures</subject><subject>Eleocharis</subject><subject>Eleocharis baldwinii</subject><subject>floating marsh</subject><subject>floating marshes</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Plant biomass</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>REGULAR SUBMISSIONS</subject><subject>Restoration strategies</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>sediment addition</subject><subject>sediment deposition</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation effects</subject><subject>vegetation mats</subject><subject>Water exchange</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>wetland plants</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkVFr2zAUhcVYoVm731DBYGxQZ9K1LDvdk-rIjcGxguUwyhjCju0tJY07q3nYv6-Myx72uBcJoe-cezkHoTklc8pD-EIgDL0AKHwCQsLPEH6nhPIbnaYiSX7AnMxj9RXeoBldMN_jwPhbNPsrOkfvrH0gTgFAZ-iXlst0LfMSp_lmO56lwgInmRJlmt_hpJB69U2UssBrUejVDZZJIuNSY5VjrdIMbwq1kUWZSn2Nb7fqXuTx_TUW-RJvMuF8b1O1FlpforOuOtj2_et9gbaJLOOVl6m7NBaZV7GAPXtBTZqQdazhhHHogqbd-bRmTQvQ-AxYxHacMkaiqKHuCQFroo7ztqtCSru69i_Qx8n3aeh_n1r7bB73dtceDtWx7U_WuFCIDxFx4Id_wIf-NBzdbgYWQIBGEfiOSiZqN_TWDm1nnob9YzX8MZSYsQ4zJmvGZM1Yh4HQjHWYqQ7j_k2sDDijq8moq3pT_Rz21mw1EOoTEjFG_YUjlhNR7_v-2P7voBd9FJN8</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Kate</creator><creator>Sasser, Charles E.</creator><creator>Visser, Jenneke M.</creator><creator>DeLaune, Ronald D.</creator><general>The Society of Wetland Scientists</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS</title><author>Carpenter, Kate ; Sasser, Charles E. ; Visser, Jenneke M. ; DeLaune, Ronald D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Buoyancy</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>coasts</topic><topic>delta soils</topic><topic>deltas</topic><topic>Diversion structures</topic><topic>Eleocharis</topic><topic>Eleocharis baldwinii</topic><topic>floating marsh</topic><topic>floating marshes</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Plant biomass</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>REGULAR SUBMISSIONS</topic><topic>Restoration strategies</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>sediment addition</topic><topic>sediment deposition</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation effects</topic><topic>vegetation mats</topic><topic>Water exchange</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>wetland plants</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasser, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Jenneke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLaune, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Kate</au><au>Sasser, Charles E.</au><au>Visser, Jenneke M.</au><au>DeLaune, Ronald D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1016</spage><epage>1024</epage><pages>1016-1024</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Coastal restoration strategies in the Mississippi River Delta Plain include use of direct sediment additions as well as river diversions to reintroduce fresh water and sediments into coastal marshes. Often, these diversions are located in the upper parts of the coastal basins, where fresh water floating marshes predominate. Floating marshes are wetlands of emergent vascular vegetation that have a significant mat of live and dead roots, dead organic material, and mineral sediments. Mats move vertically as ambient water levels rise and fall. As such, extensive water exchange is maintained below the mat, while overland sheet flow is reduced or eliminated, limiting inorganic sediment input. Thus, the effect of sediment introduction into floating marsh wetlands is unknown. In this study, we documented marsh mat response to Mississippi River sediment addition and measured change in soil properties, species composition change, and growth of vegetation. The study included two sites located in seasonally floating thin-mat marshes dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis baldwinii). At each site, 16 plots were established. Each 1 m2 plot was randomly assigned one of four treatments: none, low, medium, and high sediment additions, with the highest sediment addition representing approximately 15 years of deposition from an existing river diversion at Caernarvon, Louisiana. With increasing sediment addition, significant increases in bulk density, and significant decreases in percent organic matter in the top 25 cm of the marsh mat were observed. Most of the sediment added remained in the top 10 cm of the marsh mat. No significant differences in water level over the mat were found among treatments, indicating that buoyancy was not affected by sediment addition. Aboveground biomass tended to increase with sediment addition, although the differences were not statistically significant. Belowground biomass was not significantly affected by the addition of sediment. These results indicate that sediment additions at the level supplied by existing diversion structures should not sink floating marsh mats and may have slight positive effects on vegetation biomass.</abstract><cop>1313 Dolley Madison Boulevard, Suite 402, McLean, Virginia, USA 22101</cop><pub>The Society of Wetland Scientists</pub><doi>10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1016:SIIAFF]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-5212
ispartof Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2007-12, Vol.27 (4), p.1016-1024
issn 0277-5212
1943-6246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19403280
source Springer Nature
subjects aquatic plants
Biomass
Bulk density
Buoyancy
Coastal waters
coasts
delta soils
deltas
Diversion structures
Eleocharis
Eleocharis baldwinii
floating marsh
floating marshes
Fluvial sediments
Fresh water
freshwater
Louisiana
Marshes
Organic matter
Plant biomass
plant growth
REGULAR SUBMISSIONS
Restoration strategies
Rivers
sediment addition
sediment deposition
Sediments
Soil erosion
Soil properties
Soils
Species composition
species diversity
Statistical analysis
Vegetation
Vegetation effects
vegetation mats
Water exchange
Water levels
wetland plants
Wetlands
title SEDIMENT INPUT INTO A FLOATING FRESHWATER MARSH: EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES, BUOYANCY, AND PLANT BIOMASS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SEDIMENT%20INPUT%20INTO%20A%20FLOATING%20FRESHWATER%20MARSH:%20EFFECTS%20ON%20SOIL%20PROPERTIES,%20BUOYANCY,%20AND%20PLANT%20BIOMASS&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Kate&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1016&rft.epage=1024&rft.pages=1016-1024&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27%5B1016:SIIAFF%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19403280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-5b0d74f4d60462f5dec31b4de22d342484c6144088d1424254d8f66efa711fbb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920218823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true