Loading…

Statistical Methods Helping and Hindering Environmental Science and Management

Environmental scientists face the reality that many of their journals' editors and referees routinely insist that results be accompanied by statements of statistical significance, obtained from two-sided tests of point-null hypotheses. Many in these three groups of people appear only vaguely aw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics biological, and environmental statistics, 2002-09, Vol.7 (3), p.300-305
Main Author: McBride, Graham B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Environmental scientists face the reality that many of their journals' editors and referees routinely insist that results be accompanied by statements of statistical significance, obtained from two-sided tests of point-null hypotheses. Many in these three groups of people appear only vaguely aware of the arbitrariness often invoked by this procedure and of the information sterility in a single p-value. The interpretation to be made of the failure of a test to attain such significance is not clear. For such reasons, some colleagues (and senior statisticians) have called current usage of the procedures into serious question. Some reasons for this dislocation and some of the more dramatic consequences for environmental science and management are presented. Interval and Bayesian approaches can offer remedies.
ISSN:1085-7117
1537-2693
DOI:10.1198/108571102258