Loading…

Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance

Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science and pollution research international 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451
Main Authors: Nguyen, Dinh Duc, Yoon, Yong Soo, Bui, Xuan Thanh, Kim, Sung Su, Chang, Soon Woong, Guo, Wenshan, Ngo, Huu Hao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3
container_end_page 25451
container_issue 32
container_start_page 25441
container_title Environmental science and pollution research international
container_volume 24
creator Nguyen, Dinh Duc
Yoon, Yong Soo
Bui, Xuan Thanh
Kim, Sung Su
Chang, Soon Woong
Guo, Wenshan
Ngo, Huu Hao
description Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m 3 for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942673001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942673001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhUVoaW7SPkA3RdBNNm41-rGkZQhtGgh0066FLI8TB1tyJDuQt69ub1JCoItBiPPNmWEOIR-BfQHG9NcCIFTbMNC1DGv4EdlBC7LR0to3ZMeslA0IKY_JSSl3jHFmuX5HjrmxolXW7sjjVRymDWPAQtNA04LZr2OKfqKLz37GFXNVIl1uU6mVt0IzzumhAmOknV_DLfWxpyHFdYxbqjpOGNacQvI32_TXjS71i6XQaj-kPPs67z15O_ip4Ien95T8_v7t18WP5vrn5dXF-XUTpOJro2TXKgkmCN4zLXrDe9Vp6MBwzpXpldAShPfYdYoHEIPUQRsTOhx827denJKzg2_d4X7Dsrp5LAGnyUes2zqwkrdaMAYV_fwKvUtbrrfYU6blTFvglYIDFXIqJePgljzOPj86YG6fizvk4moubp-L2_d8enLeuhn7fx3PQVSAH4BSpXiD-cXo_7r-AZzjmoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986207912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><description>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m 3 for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28936599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conductivity ; Current density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Efficiency ; Electrocoagulation ; Electrolysis ; Energy requirements ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Performance prediction ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Phosphorus removal ; Process variables ; Research Article ; Response surface methodology ; Statistical models ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste Water - analysis ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Management ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1986207912/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1986207912?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Soon Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m 3 for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Process variables</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste Water - analysis</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhUVoaW7SPkA3RdBNNm41-rGkZQhtGgh0066FLI8TB1tyJDuQt69ub1JCoItBiPPNmWEOIR-BfQHG9NcCIFTbMNC1DGv4EdlBC7LR0to3ZMeslA0IKY_JSSl3jHFmuX5HjrmxolXW7sjjVRymDWPAQtNA04LZr2OKfqKLz37GFXNVIl1uU6mVt0IzzumhAmOknV_DLfWxpyHFdYxbqjpOGNacQvI32_TXjS71i6XQaj-kPPs67z15O_ip4Ien95T8_v7t18WP5vrn5dXF-XUTpOJro2TXKgkmCN4zLXrDe9Vp6MBwzpXpldAShPfYdYoHEIPUQRsTOhx827denJKzg2_d4X7Dsrp5LAGnyUes2zqwkrdaMAYV_fwKvUtbrrfYU6blTFvglYIDFXIqJePgljzOPj86YG6fizvk4moubp-L2_d8enLeuhn7fx3PQVSAH4BSpXiD-cXo_7r-AZzjmoc</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creator><creator>Yoon, Yong Soo</creator><creator>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creator><creator>Kim, Sung Su</creator><creator>Chang, Soon Woong</creator><creator>Guo, Wenshan</creator><creator>Ngo, Huu Hao</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><author>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Process variables</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste Water - analysis</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Soon Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</au><au>Yoon, Yong Soo</au><au>Bui, Xuan Thanh</au><au>Kim, Sung Su</au><au>Chang, Soon Woong</au><au>Guo, Wenshan</au><au>Ngo, Huu Hao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>25441</spage><epage>25451</epage><pages>25441-25451</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m 3 for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28936599</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0944-1344
ispartof Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451
issn 0944-1344
1614-7499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942673001
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Conductivity
Current density
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Efficiency
Electrocoagulation
Electrolysis
Energy requirements
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental science
Mathematical models
Optimization
Performance prediction
Phosphorus
Phosphorus - analysis
Phosphorus removal
Process variables
Research Article
Response surface methodology
Statistical models
Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste Water - analysis
Waste Water Technology
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Water Management
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollution Control
title Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences%20of%20operational%20parameters%20on%20phosphorus%20removal%20in%20batch%20and%20continuous%20electrocoagulation%20process%20performance&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Dinh%20Duc&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=25441&rft.epage=25451&rft.pages=25441-25451&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942673001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986207912&rft_id=info:pmid/28936599&rfr_iscdi=true