Loading…
Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance
Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3 |
container_end_page | 25451 |
container_issue | 32 |
container_start_page | 25441 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Nguyen, Dinh Duc Yoon, Yong Soo Bui, Xuan Thanh Kim, Sung Su Chang, Soon Woong Guo, Wenshan Ngo, Huu Hao |
description | Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m
3
for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942673001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942673001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhUVoaW7SPkA3RdBNNm41-rGkZQhtGgh0066FLI8TB1tyJDuQt69ub1JCoItBiPPNmWEOIR-BfQHG9NcCIFTbMNC1DGv4EdlBC7LR0to3ZMeslA0IKY_JSSl3jHFmuX5HjrmxolXW7sjjVRymDWPAQtNA04LZr2OKfqKLz37GFXNVIl1uU6mVt0IzzumhAmOknV_DLfWxpyHFdYxbqjpOGNacQvI32_TXjS71i6XQaj-kPPs67z15O_ip4Ien95T8_v7t18WP5vrn5dXF-XUTpOJro2TXKgkmCN4zLXrDe9Vp6MBwzpXpldAShPfYdYoHEIPUQRsTOhx827denJKzg2_d4X7Dsrp5LAGnyUes2zqwkrdaMAYV_fwKvUtbrrfYU6blTFvglYIDFXIqJePgljzOPj86YG6fizvk4moubp-L2_d8enLeuhn7fx3PQVSAH4BSpXiD-cXo_7r-AZzjmoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986207912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><description>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m
3
for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28936599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conductivity ; Current density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Efficiency ; Electrocoagulation ; Electrolysis ; Energy requirements ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Performance prediction ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Phosphorus removal ; Process variables ; Research Article ; Response surface methodology ; Statistical models ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste Water - analysis ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Management ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1986207912/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1986207912?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28936599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Soon Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m
3
for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Process variables</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste Water - analysis</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhUVoaW7SPkA3RdBNNm41-rGkZQhtGgh0066FLI8TB1tyJDuQt69ub1JCoItBiPPNmWEOIR-BfQHG9NcCIFTbMNC1DGv4EdlBC7LR0to3ZMeslA0IKY_JSSl3jHFmuX5HjrmxolXW7sjjVRymDWPAQtNA04LZr2OKfqKLz37GFXNVIl1uU6mVt0IzzumhAmOknV_DLfWxpyHFdYxbqjpOGNacQvI32_TXjS71i6XQaj-kPPs67z15O_ip4Ien95T8_v7t18WP5vrn5dXF-XUTpOJro2TXKgkmCN4zLXrDe9Vp6MBwzpXpldAShPfYdYoHEIPUQRsTOhx827denJKzg2_d4X7Dsrp5LAGnyUes2zqwkrdaMAYV_fwKvUtbrrfYU6blTFvglYIDFXIqJePgljzOPj86YG6fizvk4moubp-L2_d8enLeuhn7fx3PQVSAH4BSpXiD-cXo_7r-AZzjmoc</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creator><creator>Yoon, Yong Soo</creator><creator>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creator><creator>Kim, Sung Su</creator><creator>Chang, Soon Woong</creator><creator>Guo, Wenshan</creator><creator>Ngo, Huu Hao</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</title><author>Nguyen, Dinh Duc ; Yoon, Yong Soo ; Bui, Xuan Thanh ; Kim, Sung Su ; Chang, Soon Woong ; Guo, Wenshan ; Ngo, Huu Hao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Process variables</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste Water - analysis</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, Xuan Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Soon Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Dinh Duc</au><au>Yoon, Yong Soo</au><au>Bui, Xuan Thanh</au><au>Kim, Sung Su</au><au>Chang, Soon Woong</au><au>Guo, Wenshan</au><au>Ngo, Huu Hao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>25441</spage><epage>25451</epage><pages>25441-25451</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Performance of an electrocoagulation (EC) process in batch and continuous operating modes was thoroughly investigated and evaluated for enhancing wastewater phosphorus removal under various operating conditions, individually or combined with initial phosphorus concentration, wastewater conductivity, current density, and electrolysis times. The results revealed excellent phosphorus removal (72.7–100%) for both processes within 3–6 min of electrolysis, with relatively low energy requirements, i.e., less than 0.5 kWh/m
3
for treated wastewater. However, the removal efficiency of phosphorus in the continuous EC operation mode was better than that in batch mode within the scope of the study. Additionally, the rate and efficiency of phosphorus removal strongly depended on operational parameters, including wastewater conductivity, initial phosphorus concentration, current density, and electrolysis time. Based on experimental data, statistical model verification of the response surface methodology (RSM) (multiple factor optimization) was also established to provide further insights and accurately describe the interactive relationship between the process variables, thus optimizing the EC process performance. The EC process using iron electrodes is promising for improving wastewater phosphorus removal efficiency, and RSM can be a sustainable tool for predicting the performance of the EC process and explaining the influence of the process variables.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28936599</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-3657</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017-11, Vol.24 (32), p.25441-25451 |
issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942673001 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature |
subjects | Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Conductivity Current density Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Efficiency Electrocoagulation Electrolysis Energy requirements Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Mathematical models Optimization Performance prediction Phosphorus Phosphorus - analysis Phosphorus removal Process variables Research Article Response surface methodology Statistical models Waste Disposal, Fluid - instrumentation Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Waste Water - analysis Waste Water Technology Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water Management Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollution Control |
title | Influences of operational parameters on phosphorus removal in batch and continuous electrocoagulation process performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A37%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences%20of%20operational%20parameters%20on%20phosphorus%20removal%20in%20batch%20and%20continuous%20electrocoagulation%20process%20performance&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Dinh%20Duc&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=25441&rft.epage=25451&rft.pages=25441-25451&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-017-0180-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942673001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-54b65418c32d073d82d5b71b1822258d537413aaebb52c13f47c788cbefa6d6a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986207912&rft_id=info:pmid/28936599&rfr_iscdi=true |