Loading…

The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects

The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine‐impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian endodontic journal 2018-12, Vol.44 (3), p.204-207
Main Authors: Torabinejad, Mahmoud, Kang, Hyun J. S., Maskiewicz, Richard, Grandhi, Anupama
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-322ecc9e5c302063a347a28468620963eea66ea01aca6c205d3c5e67e84a9e873
container_end_page 207
container_issue 3
container_start_page 204
container_title Australian endodontic journal
container_volume 44
creator Torabinejad, Mahmoud
Kang, Hyun J. S.
Maskiewicz, Richard
Grandhi, Anupama
description The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine‐impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to the osseous defects in guinea pigs for 2 min and blood loss was measured. The animals were then sacrificed 7 weeks later and the degree of foreign body reaction was scored. The data were analysed by the independent‐samples Kruskal‐Wallis test. Epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes showed significantly better haemostatic effect compared to epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets. The PU foam containing epinephrine specimens elicited significantly less foreign body reaction compared to epinephrine cotton pellets (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aej.12234
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942693681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942693681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-322ecc9e5c302063a347a28468620963eea66ea01aca6c205d3c5e67e84a9e873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb1O5TAQhS0EAhYoeAFkiWYpAv67dlIiBCwrpG3Y2hqcCddXSRzsRCgd77BvyJNguECxElN4XHxzdGYOIYecnfJcZ4CrUy6EVBtklxtlCqWM2cx_KaqCV8rskB8prRgTShq-TXZEWSmmFnKXjHdLpEvALqQRRu8oNo134GYKfU2bENE_9PQ-1DONCG70oaehoTj4HodlzO_L87-bboj40MOINR1CO08RxyX0mOehoz5PpIRhSrTGBt2Y9slWA23Cg4--R_5eXd5d_Cpu_1zfXJzfFk5yqQopBDpX4cJJJpiWIJUBUSpdasEqLRFBawTGwYF2gi1q6RaoDZYKKiyN3CM_17pDDI8TptF2Pjls2-wt27H5NEJXUpc8o8f_oaswxT67s4IrZmRZGp2pkzXlYl4pYmOH6DuIs-XMvkVhcxT2PYrMHn0oTvcd1l_k5-0zcLYGnnyL8_dK9vzy91ryFb5hlBY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2140738876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Torabinejad, Mahmoud ; Kang, Hyun J. S. ; Maskiewicz, Richard ; Grandhi, Anupama</creator><creatorcontrib>Torabinejad, Mahmoud ; Kang, Hyun J. S. ; Maskiewicz, Richard ; Grandhi, Anupama</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine‐impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to the osseous defects in guinea pigs for 2 min and blood loss was measured. The animals were then sacrificed 7 weeks later and the degree of foreign body reaction was scored. The data were analysed by the independent‐samples Kruskal‐Wallis test. Epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes showed significantly better haemostatic effect compared to epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets. The PU foam containing epinephrine specimens elicited significantly less foreign body reaction compared to epinephrine cotton pellets (P &lt; 0.05). Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes are a good alternative to epinephrine‐impregnated cotton pellets as a local haemostatic agent in endodontic surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1329-1947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-4477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aej.12234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28940453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; apical surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cotton ; Data processing ; Defects ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - adverse effects ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - methods ; Dentistry ; Disease Models, Animal ; Endodontics ; Epinephrine ; Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage ; foam ; foreign body reaction ; Foreign-Body Reaction - therapy ; Guinea Pigs ; haemostatic ; Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control ; Hemostatic Techniques ; impregnated polyurethane ; Male ; Polyurethane ; Polyurethanes ; Random Allocation ; Surgery ; Surgical Sponges ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Australian endodontic journal, 2018-12, Vol.44 (3), p.204-207</ispartof><rights>2017 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc</rights><rights>2017 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-322ecc9e5c302063a347a28468620963eea66ea01aca6c205d3c5e67e84a9e873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1340-0439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torabinejad, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Hyun J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskiewicz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandhi, Anupama</creatorcontrib><title>The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects</title><title>Australian endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine‐impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to the osseous defects in guinea pigs for 2 min and blood loss was measured. The animals were then sacrificed 7 weeks later and the degree of foreign body reaction was scored. The data were analysed by the independent‐samples Kruskal‐Wallis test. Epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes showed significantly better haemostatic effect compared to epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets. The PU foam containing epinephrine specimens elicited significantly less foreign body reaction compared to epinephrine cotton pellets (P &lt; 0.05). Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes are a good alternative to epinephrine‐impregnated cotton pellets as a local haemostatic agent in endodontic surgery.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>apical surgery</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Epinephrine</subject><subject>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>foam</subject><subject>foreign body reaction</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - therapy</subject><subject>Guinea Pigs</subject><subject>haemostatic</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques</subject><subject>impregnated polyurethane</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polyurethane</subject><subject>Polyurethanes</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Sponges</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1329-1947</issn><issn>1747-4477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kb1O5TAQhS0EAhYoeAFkiWYpAv67dlIiBCwrpG3Y2hqcCddXSRzsRCgd77BvyJNguECxElN4XHxzdGYOIYecnfJcZ4CrUy6EVBtklxtlCqWM2cx_KaqCV8rskB8prRgTShq-TXZEWSmmFnKXjHdLpEvALqQRRu8oNo134GYKfU2bENE_9PQ-1DONCG70oaehoTj4HodlzO_L87-bboj40MOINR1CO08RxyX0mOehoz5PpIRhSrTGBt2Y9slWA23Cg4--R_5eXd5d_Cpu_1zfXJzfFk5yqQopBDpX4cJJJpiWIJUBUSpdasEqLRFBawTGwYF2gi1q6RaoDZYKKiyN3CM_17pDDI8TptF2Pjls2-wt27H5NEJXUpc8o8f_oaswxT67s4IrZmRZGp2pkzXlYl4pYmOH6DuIs-XMvkVhcxT2PYrMHn0oTvcd1l_k5-0zcLYGnnyL8_dK9vzy91ryFb5hlBY</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Torabinejad, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Kang, Hyun J. S.</creator><creator>Maskiewicz, Richard</creator><creator>Grandhi, Anupama</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-0439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects</title><author>Torabinejad, Mahmoud ; Kang, Hyun J. S. ; Maskiewicz, Richard ; Grandhi, Anupama</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-322ecc9e5c302063a347a28468620963eea66ea01aca6c205d3c5e67e84a9e873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>apical surgery</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Epinephrine</topic><topic>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>foam</topic><topic>foreign body reaction</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - therapy</topic><topic>Guinea Pigs</topic><topic>haemostatic</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques</topic><topic>impregnated polyurethane</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polyurethane</topic><topic>Polyurethanes</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Sponges</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torabinejad, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Hyun J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maskiewicz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandhi, Anupama</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torabinejad, Mahmoud</au><au>Kang, Hyun J. S.</au><au>Maskiewicz, Richard</au><au>Grandhi, Anupama</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects</atitle><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>204-207</pages><issn>1329-1947</issn><eissn>1747-4477</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare the haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets with those of epinephrine‐impregnated polyurethane (PU) foam cubes in osseous defects created in guinea pigs. Initially, these substances were randomly applied to the osseous defects in guinea pigs for 2 min and blood loss was measured. The animals were then sacrificed 7 weeks later and the degree of foreign body reaction was scored. The data were analysed by the independent‐samples Kruskal‐Wallis test. Epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes showed significantly better haemostatic effect compared to epinephrine–impregnated cotton pellets. The PU foam containing epinephrine specimens elicited significantly less foreign body reaction compared to epinephrine cotton pellets (P &lt; 0.05). Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that epinephrine‐impregnated PU foam cubes are a good alternative to epinephrine‐impregnated cotton pellets as a local haemostatic agent in endodontic surgery.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28940453</pmid><doi>10.1111/aej.12234</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-0439</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1329-1947
ispartof Australian endodontic journal, 2018-12, Vol.44 (3), p.204-207
issn 1329-1947
1747-4477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1942693681
source Wiley
subjects Animals
apical surgery
Chi-Square Distribution
Cotton
Data processing
Defects
Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - adverse effects
Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic - methods
Dentistry
Disease Models, Animal
Endodontics
Epinephrine
Epinephrine - administration & dosage
foam
foreign body reaction
Foreign-Body Reaction - therapy
Guinea Pigs
haemostatic
Hemorrhage - prevention & control
Hemostatic Techniques
impregnated polyurethane
Male
Polyurethane
Polyurethanes
Random Allocation
Surgery
Surgical Sponges
Treatment Outcome
title The haemostatic efficacy and foreign body reaction of epinephrine–Impregnated polyurethane foam in osseous defects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20haemostatic%20efficacy%20and%20foreign%20body%20reaction%20of%20epinephrine%E2%80%93Impregnated%20polyurethane%20foam%20in%20osseous%20defects&rft.jtitle=Australian%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Torabinejad,%20Mahmoud&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=204-207&rft.issn=1329-1947&rft.eissn=1747-4477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aej.12234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942693681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-322ecc9e5c302063a347a28468620963eea66ea01aca6c205d3c5e67e84a9e873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2140738876&rft_id=info:pmid/28940453&rfr_iscdi=true