Once-Daily Treatments for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Are They Good Enough?

• Published in: Current infectious disease reports 2017-11, Vol.19 (11), p.43-43, Article 43
• Main Authors: Lother, Sylvain A., Press, Natasha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Bacterial infections; Clinical outcomes; Drug therapy; Gastroenteritis; Gastroenteritis (T Steiner; Hepatitis; Infectious Diseases; Intra-abdominal Infections; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Section Editor; Topical Collection on Intra-abdominal Infections
• ISSN: 1523-3847; 1534-3146
• DOI: 10.1007/s11908-017-0599-0

Purpose of the Review Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. First-line treatment requires frequent daily doses of an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam. However, some physicians prescribe simpler once-daily regimens to improve compliance and improve healthcare utilization. We reviewed the literature regarding advantages, pitfalls, and efficacy of once-daily treatment options for MSSA bacteremia. Recent Findings Several once-daily antibiotics are effective in vitro against MSSA (ceftriaxone, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, tedizolid, ertapenem, fluoroquinolones, and others), but there is insufficient evidence to support these agents for MSSA bacteremia. Ceftriaxone may be considered for therapy completion with MSSA bacteremia from osteomyelitis, and daptomycin may be considered in patients who cannot tolerate first-line therapy. However, they have not been compared to traditional second-line agents, and their role remains uncertain. Summary Current evidence does not support the use of once-daily treatment options for MSSA bacteremia.