Loading…

Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements

The objective of our study is to evaluate our preliminary results after changing from a 2-stage revision arthroplasty protocol to a 1-stage revision arthroplasty protocol using cementless arthroplasty for all patients with chronic infected hip replacements. Prospective study of all hip arthroplastie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2018-02, Vol.33 (2), p.527-532
Main Authors: Bori, Guillem, Navarro, Guillem, Morata, Laura, Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A., Soriano, Alex, Gallart, Xavier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163
container_end_page 532
container_issue 2
container_start_page 527
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 33
creator Bori, Guillem
Navarro, Guillem
Morata, Laura
Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A.
Soriano, Alex
Gallart, Xavier
description The objective of our study is to evaluate our preliminary results after changing from a 2-stage revision arthroplasty protocol to a 1-stage revision arthroplasty protocol using cementless arthroplasty for all patients with chronic infected hip replacements. Prospective study of all hip arthroplasties that were diagnosed with chronic infection and were treated using the 1-stage revision without taking into account the traditional criteria used to determine the use of a 1-stage revision was conducted. There were 2 main variables evaluated: infection control and costs. The definitive diagnosis of infection of the revision was determined using the criteria proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. The costs were calculated using average cost in USD, excluding social expenses, as described by Klouche (2010) for 1-stage or 2-stage revisions. Nineteen patients were included in the study and the infection was controlled in 18 patients. The total economic savings for our hospital for these 19 patients was 391.609 USD. This clinical success has led to an important change in our hospital in treating chronic infected hip replacements and an important cost reduction from an economic point of view.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1943282721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540317307568</els_id><sourcerecordid>1943282721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EokPhB1ggL9kk2HFiOxKb0YjSSpValXZtOfbL1KPEHmxPUT-HP8VhBiQ2rKwnnXuf370IvaekpoTyT7tax_xYN4SKmsiaMPYCrWjHmkq2hL9EKyIlq7qWsDP0JqUdIZR2XfsanTWybwUTbIV-3kaY3Oy8js_4DtJhygmvxwwRbx613zq_xRcxzPj-R6i-Zb0FnAO-8XAa7uDJJRc8XpevxLCfdMrP-DaGHEyY8ENaDDYwg88TpPQvNoZlSwzeGXzlRzAZLL50--JaCPNbld6iV6OeErw7vefo4eLL_eayur75erVZX1eGdTxXtBU95xykkUxz2w6D1D0FkCBF31gjBs4sDJYIM4zcCsMNL2mUIDpLLeXsHH08-u5j-H6AlNXskoFp0h7CISnat6yRjWhoQZsjamJIKcKo9tHNJUFFiVqqUTu1VKOWahSRqlRTRB9O_odhBvtX8qeLAnw-AlCufHIQVTIOvAHrYolG2eD-5_8L6PWjbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943282721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Bori, Guillem ; Navarro, Guillem ; Morata, Laura ; Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A. ; Soriano, Alex ; Gallart, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Bori, Guillem ; Navarro, Guillem ; Morata, Laura ; Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A. ; Soriano, Alex ; Gallart, Xavier</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of our study is to evaluate our preliminary results after changing from a 2-stage revision arthroplasty protocol to a 1-stage revision arthroplasty protocol using cementless arthroplasty for all patients with chronic infected hip replacements. Prospective study of all hip arthroplasties that were diagnosed with chronic infection and were treated using the 1-stage revision without taking into account the traditional criteria used to determine the use of a 1-stage revision was conducted. There were 2 main variables evaluated: infection control and costs. The definitive diagnosis of infection of the revision was determined using the criteria proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. The costs were calculated using average cost in USD, excluding social expenses, as described by Klouche (2010) for 1-stage or 2-stage revisions. Nineteen patients were included in the study and the infection was controlled in 18 patients. The total economic savings for our hospital for these 19 patients was 391.609 USD. This clinical success has led to an important change in our hospital in treating chronic infected hip replacements and an important cost reduction from an economic point of view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28947373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>1-stage arthroplasty ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Debridement ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; hip ; hip arthroplasty ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; infection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; single stage revision</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018-02, Vol.33 (2), p.527-532</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8402-4880 ; 0000-0002-1335-7741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28947373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bori, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morata, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriano, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallart, Xavier</creatorcontrib><title>Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The objective of our study is to evaluate our preliminary results after changing from a 2-stage revision arthroplasty protocol to a 1-stage revision arthroplasty protocol using cementless arthroplasty for all patients with chronic infected hip replacements. Prospective study of all hip arthroplasties that were diagnosed with chronic infection and were treated using the 1-stage revision without taking into account the traditional criteria used to determine the use of a 1-stage revision was conducted. There were 2 main variables evaluated: infection control and costs. The definitive diagnosis of infection of the revision was determined using the criteria proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. The costs were calculated using average cost in USD, excluding social expenses, as described by Klouche (2010) for 1-stage or 2-stage revisions. Nineteen patients were included in the study and the infection was controlled in 18 patients. The total economic savings for our hospital for these 19 patients was 391.609 USD. This clinical success has led to an important change in our hospital in treating chronic infected hip replacements and an important cost reduction from an economic point of view.</description><subject>1-stage arthroplasty</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>hip</subject><subject>hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>single stage revision</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EokPhB1ggL9kk2HFiOxKb0YjSSpValXZtOfbL1KPEHmxPUT-HP8VhBiQ2rKwnnXuf370IvaekpoTyT7tax_xYN4SKmsiaMPYCrWjHmkq2hL9EKyIlq7qWsDP0JqUdIZR2XfsanTWybwUTbIV-3kaY3Oy8js_4DtJhygmvxwwRbx613zq_xRcxzPj-R6i-Zb0FnAO-8XAa7uDJJRc8XpevxLCfdMrP-DaGHEyY8ENaDDYwg88TpPQvNoZlSwzeGXzlRzAZLL50--JaCPNbld6iV6OeErw7vefo4eLL_eayur75erVZX1eGdTxXtBU95xykkUxz2w6D1D0FkCBF31gjBs4sDJYIM4zcCsMNL2mUIDpLLeXsHH08-u5j-H6AlNXskoFp0h7CISnat6yRjWhoQZsjamJIKcKo9tHNJUFFiVqqUTu1VKOWahSRqlRTRB9O_odhBvtX8qeLAnw-AlCufHIQVTIOvAHrYolG2eD-5_8L6PWjbQ</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Bori, Guillem</creator><creator>Navarro, Guillem</creator><creator>Morata, Laura</creator><creator>Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A.</creator><creator>Soriano, Alex</creator><creator>Gallart, Xavier</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-4880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-7741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements</title><author>Bori, Guillem ; Navarro, Guillem ; Morata, Laura ; Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A. ; Soriano, Alex ; Gallart, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>1-stage arthroplasty</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>hip</topic><topic>hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>single stage revision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bori, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Guillem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morata, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriano, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallart, Xavier</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bori, Guillem</au><au>Navarro, Guillem</au><au>Morata, Laura</au><au>Fernández-Valencia, Jenaro A.</au><au>Soriano, Alex</au><au>Gallart, Xavier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>527-532</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The objective of our study is to evaluate our preliminary results after changing from a 2-stage revision arthroplasty protocol to a 1-stage revision arthroplasty protocol using cementless arthroplasty for all patients with chronic infected hip replacements. Prospective study of all hip arthroplasties that were diagnosed with chronic infection and were treated using the 1-stage revision without taking into account the traditional criteria used to determine the use of a 1-stage revision was conducted. There were 2 main variables evaluated: infection control and costs. The definitive diagnosis of infection of the revision was determined using the criteria proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. The costs were calculated using average cost in USD, excluding social expenses, as described by Klouche (2010) for 1-stage or 2-stage revisions. Nineteen patients were included in the study and the infection was controlled in 18 patients. The total economic savings for our hospital for these 19 patients was 391.609 USD. This clinical success has led to an important change in our hospital in treating chronic infected hip replacements and an important cost reduction from an economic point of view.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28947373</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.033</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-4880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-7741</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018-02, Vol.33 (2), p.527-532
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1943282721
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects 1-stage arthroplasty
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Debridement
Female
Health Care Costs
hip
hip arthroplasty
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
infection
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
single stage revision
title Preliminary Results After Changing From Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty Protocol Using Cementless Arthroplasty for Chronic Infected Hip Replacements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A44%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preliminary%20Results%20After%20Changing%20From%20Two-Stage%20to%20One-Stage%20Revision%20Arthroplasty%20Protocol%20Using%20Cementless%20Arthroplasty%20for%20Chronic%20Infected%20Hip%20Replacements&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Bori,%20Guillem&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=527-532&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943282721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1479666e8c83a6d4bb8a91ee8e8792dc7b63debd07cbf6d7c6c61558945d1d163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943282721&rft_id=info:pmid/28947373&rfr_iscdi=true