Loading…

Serum Surfactant Protein D as a Biomarker for Measuring Lung Involvement in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

ContextLung impairment is a new target for late diabetic complications. Biomarkers that could help identify patients requiring functional respiratory tests have not been reported.ObjectiveOur aim was to examine whether serum surfactant protein D (SP-D) and A (SP-A) could be useful biomarkers of lung...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2017-11, Vol.102 (11), p.4109-4116
Main Authors: López-Cano, Carolina, Lecube, Albert, García-Ramírez, Marta, Muñoz, Xavier, Sánchez, Enric, Seminario, Asunción, Hernández, Marta, Ciudin, Andreea, Gutiérrez, Liliana, Hernández, Cristina, Simó, Rafael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ContextLung impairment is a new target for late diabetic complications. Biomarkers that could help identify patients requiring functional respiratory tests have not been reported.ObjectiveOur aim was to examine whether serum surfactant protein D (SP-D) and A (SP-A) could be useful biomarkers of lung damage in obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) without known lung disease.Design and SettingA case-control study conducted in an ambulatory obesity unit.PatientsForty-nine obese patients with T2D and 98 subjects without diabetes matched by age, sex, body mass index, and waist circumference were included.InterventionsSerum SP-D and SP-A levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Forced spirometry and static pulmonary volume were assessed.ResultsPatients with T2D exhibited higher serum SP-D concentrations than control subjects (P = 0.006). No differences in serum SP-A concentrations were observed. There was an inverse association between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and serum SP-D (r = −0.265; P = 0.029), as well as a significant positive relationship between SP-D concentration and residual volume (r = 0.293; P = 0.043). From receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best SP-D cutoff to identify a FEV1
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2017-00913