Loading…
Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk
Iodine deficiency is present in certain groups of the UK population, notably in pregnant women; this is of concern as iodine is required for fetal brain development. UK milk is rich in iodine and is the principal dietary iodine source. UK sales of milk-alternative drinks are increasing but data are...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of nutrition 2017-10, Vol.118 (7), p.525-532 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73 |
container_end_page | 532 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 525 |
container_title | British journal of nutrition |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Bath, Sarah C. Hill, Sarah Infante, Heidi Goenaga Elghul, Sarah Nezianya, Carolina J. Rayman, Margaret P. |
description | Iodine deficiency is present in certain groups of the UK population, notably in pregnant women; this is of concern as iodine is required for fetal brain development. UK milk is rich in iodine and is the principal dietary iodine source. UK sales of milk-alternative drinks are increasing but data are lacking on their iodine content. As consumers may replace iodine-rich milk with milk-alternative drinks, we aimed to measure the iodine concentration of those available in the UK. Using inductively coupled plasma-MS, we determined the iodine concentration of seven types of milk-alternative drink (soya, almond, coconut, oat, rice, hazelnut and hemp) by analysing forty-seven products purchased in November/December 2015. For comparison, winter samples of conventional (n 5) and organic (n 5) cows’ milk were included. The median iodine concentration of all of the unfortified milk-alternative drinks (n 44) was low, at 7·3 μg/kg, just 1·7 % of our value for winter conventional cows’ milk (median 438 μg/kg). One brand (not the market leader), fortified its soya, oat and rice drinks with iodine and those drinks had a higher iodine concentration than unfortified drinks, at 280, 287 and 266 μg/kg, respectively. The iodine concentration of organic milk (median 324 μg/kg) was lower than that of conventional milk. Although many milk-alternative drinks are fortified with Ca, at the time of this study, just three of forty-seven drinks were fortified with iodine. Individuals who consume milk-alternative drinks that are not fortified with iodine in place of cows’ milk may be at risk of iodine deficiency unless they consume alternative dietary iodine sources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007114517002136 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1943284826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007114517002136</cupid><sourcerecordid>1949490794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9OwyAUxonRuDl9AG8MiTfeVIFSaC-N8c_iEi901w2l1LG1MKHb4p2v4ev5JNJtGqMxkHAO5_d95HAAOMboHCPMLx4RQhxjmmCOEMEx2wF9THkSEcbILuh35air98CB99OQphhl-6BH0oyyjCR9IIe21EZBaY1UpnWi1dZAW8FG17NI1K1yJtwtFSydNjMPxVLoWhS1gtrAdqLg-L6LpG3mwmkfxCvdTkK-8h9v72ubQ7BXidqro-05AOOb66eru2j0cDu8uhxFkmLWRgwRVRUpKggmmUQxkSpsKQrOSsRwXEqZhC6rkhIuaJokScUkpZmSFSFJweMBONv4zp19WSjf5o32UtW1MMoufI4zGpOUpoQF9PQXOrWL0Gm9psJCPMADgDeUdNZ7p6p87nQj3GuOUd5NIP8zgaA52TovikaV34qvLw9AvDUVTeF0-ax-vP2v7SdiDJBn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949490794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bath, Sarah C. ; Hill, Sarah ; Infante, Heidi Goenaga ; Elghul, Sarah ; Nezianya, Carolina J. ; Rayman, Margaret P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bath, Sarah C. ; Hill, Sarah ; Infante, Heidi Goenaga ; Elghul, Sarah ; Nezianya, Carolina J. ; Rayman, Margaret P.</creatorcontrib><description>Iodine deficiency is present in certain groups of the UK population, notably in pregnant women; this is of concern as iodine is required for fetal brain development. UK milk is rich in iodine and is the principal dietary iodine source. UK sales of milk-alternative drinks are increasing but data are lacking on their iodine content. As consumers may replace iodine-rich milk with milk-alternative drinks, we aimed to measure the iodine concentration of those available in the UK. Using inductively coupled plasma-MS, we determined the iodine concentration of seven types of milk-alternative drink (soya, almond, coconut, oat, rice, hazelnut and hemp) by analysing forty-seven products purchased in November/December 2015. For comparison, winter samples of conventional (n 5) and organic (n 5) cows’ milk were included. The median iodine concentration of all of the unfortified milk-alternative drinks (n 44) was low, at 7·3 μg/kg, just 1·7 % of our value for winter conventional cows’ milk (median 438 μg/kg). One brand (not the market leader), fortified its soya, oat and rice drinks with iodine and those drinks had a higher iodine concentration than unfortified drinks, at 280, 287 and 266 μg/kg, respectively. The iodine concentration of organic milk (median 324 μg/kg) was lower than that of conventional milk. Although many milk-alternative drinks are fortified with Ca, at the time of this study, just three of forty-seven drinks were fortified with iodine. Individuals who consume milk-alternative drinks that are not fortified with iodine in place of cows’ milk may be at risk of iodine deficiency unless they consume alternative dietary iodine sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517002136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28946925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algae ; Alternatives ; Animals ; Beverages ; Brain ; Cattle ; Consumers ; Cow's milk ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dairy cattle ; Dairy products ; Farming ; Female ; Fetuses ; Food allergies ; Food, Fortified - analysis ; Food, Organic ; Hemp ; Human and Clinical Nutrition ; Inductively coupled plasma ; Iodine ; Iodine - analysis ; Laboratories ; Milk ; Milk - chemistry ; Milk Substitutes - chemistry ; Nutrient deficiency ; Nutrition ; Nutritive Sweeteners - analysis ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Rice ; Sample Size ; Seasons ; Thyroid gland ; United Kingdom ; Winter ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>British journal of nutrition, 2017-10, Vol.118 (7), p.525-532</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007114517002136/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28946925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bath, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Infante, Heidi Goenaga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghul, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezianya, Carolina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayman, Margaret P.</creatorcontrib><title>Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk</title><title>British journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><description>Iodine deficiency is present in certain groups of the UK population, notably in pregnant women; this is of concern as iodine is required for fetal brain development. UK milk is rich in iodine and is the principal dietary iodine source. UK sales of milk-alternative drinks are increasing but data are lacking on their iodine content. As consumers may replace iodine-rich milk with milk-alternative drinks, we aimed to measure the iodine concentration of those available in the UK. Using inductively coupled plasma-MS, we determined the iodine concentration of seven types of milk-alternative drink (soya, almond, coconut, oat, rice, hazelnut and hemp) by analysing forty-seven products purchased in November/December 2015. For comparison, winter samples of conventional (n 5) and organic (n 5) cows’ milk were included. The median iodine concentration of all of the unfortified milk-alternative drinks (n 44) was low, at 7·3 μg/kg, just 1·7 % of our value for winter conventional cows’ milk (median 438 μg/kg). One brand (not the market leader), fortified its soya, oat and rice drinks with iodine and those drinks had a higher iodine concentration than unfortified drinks, at 280, 287 and 266 μg/kg, respectively. The iodine concentration of organic milk (median 324 μg/kg) was lower than that of conventional milk. Although many milk-alternative drinks are fortified with Ca, at the time of this study, just three of forty-seven drinks were fortified with iodine. Individuals who consume milk-alternative drinks that are not fortified with iodine in place of cows’ milk may be at risk of iodine deficiency unless they consume alternative dietary iodine sources.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cow's milk</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Food allergies</subject><subject>Food, Fortified - analysis</subject><subject>Food, Organic</subject><subject>Hemp</subject><subject>Human and Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Inductively coupled plasma</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Iodine - analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk Substitutes - chemistry</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritive Sweeteners - analysis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0007-1145</issn><issn>1475-2662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9OwyAUxonRuDl9AG8MiTfeVIFSaC-N8c_iEi901w2l1LG1MKHb4p2v4ev5JNJtGqMxkHAO5_d95HAAOMboHCPMLx4RQhxjmmCOEMEx2wF9THkSEcbILuh35air98CB99OQphhl-6BH0oyyjCR9IIe21EZBaY1UpnWi1dZAW8FG17NI1K1yJtwtFSydNjMPxVLoWhS1gtrAdqLg-L6LpG3mwmkfxCvdTkK-8h9v72ubQ7BXidqro-05AOOb66eru2j0cDu8uhxFkmLWRgwRVRUpKggmmUQxkSpsKQrOSsRwXEqZhC6rkhIuaJokScUkpZmSFSFJweMBONv4zp19WSjf5o32UtW1MMoufI4zGpOUpoQF9PQXOrWL0Gm9psJCPMADgDeUdNZ7p6p87nQj3GuOUd5NIP8zgaA52TovikaV34qvLw9AvDUVTeF0-ax-vP2v7SdiDJBn</recordid><startdate>20171014</startdate><enddate>20171014</enddate><creator>Bath, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Hill, Sarah</creator><creator>Infante, Heidi Goenaga</creator><creator>Elghul, Sarah</creator><creator>Nezianya, Carolina J.</creator><creator>Rayman, Margaret P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171014</creationdate><title>Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk</title><author>Bath, Sarah C. ; Hill, Sarah ; Infante, Heidi Goenaga ; Elghul, Sarah ; Nezianya, Carolina J. ; Rayman, Margaret P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cow's milk</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Food allergies</topic><topic>Food, Fortified - analysis</topic><topic>Food, Organic</topic><topic>Hemp</topic><topic>Human and Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Inductively coupled plasma</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Iodine - analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk Substitutes - chemistry</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritive Sweeteners - analysis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bath, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Infante, Heidi Goenaga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elghul, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezianya, Carolina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayman, Margaret P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bath, Sarah C.</au><au>Hill, Sarah</au><au>Infante, Heidi Goenaga</au><au>Elghul, Sarah</au><au>Nezianya, Carolina J.</au><au>Rayman, Margaret P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk</atitle><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><date>2017-10-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>525-532</pages><issn>0007-1145</issn><eissn>1475-2662</eissn><abstract>Iodine deficiency is present in certain groups of the UK population, notably in pregnant women; this is of concern as iodine is required for fetal brain development. UK milk is rich in iodine and is the principal dietary iodine source. UK sales of milk-alternative drinks are increasing but data are lacking on their iodine content. As consumers may replace iodine-rich milk with milk-alternative drinks, we aimed to measure the iodine concentration of those available in the UK. Using inductively coupled plasma-MS, we determined the iodine concentration of seven types of milk-alternative drink (soya, almond, coconut, oat, rice, hazelnut and hemp) by analysing forty-seven products purchased in November/December 2015. For comparison, winter samples of conventional (n 5) and organic (n 5) cows’ milk were included. The median iodine concentration of all of the unfortified milk-alternative drinks (n 44) was low, at 7·3 μg/kg, just 1·7 % of our value for winter conventional cows’ milk (median 438 μg/kg). One brand (not the market leader), fortified its soya, oat and rice drinks with iodine and those drinks had a higher iodine concentration than unfortified drinks, at 280, 287 and 266 μg/kg, respectively. The iodine concentration of organic milk (median 324 μg/kg) was lower than that of conventional milk. Although many milk-alternative drinks are fortified with Ca, at the time of this study, just three of forty-seven drinks were fortified with iodine. Individuals who consume milk-alternative drinks that are not fortified with iodine in place of cows’ milk may be at risk of iodine deficiency unless they consume alternative dietary iodine sources.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28946925</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007114517002136</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1145 |
ispartof | British journal of nutrition, 2017-10, Vol.118 (7), p.525-532 |
issn | 0007-1145 1475-2662 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1943284826 |
source | Cambridge University Press; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algae Alternatives Animals Beverages Brain Cattle Consumers Cow's milk Cross-Sectional Studies Dairy cattle Dairy products Farming Female Fetuses Food allergies Food, Fortified - analysis Food, Organic Hemp Human and Clinical Nutrition Inductively coupled plasma Iodine Iodine - analysis Laboratories Milk Milk - chemistry Milk Substitutes - chemistry Nutrient deficiency Nutrition Nutritive Sweeteners - analysis Pregnancy Public health Rice Sample Size Seasons Thyroid gland United Kingdom Winter Womens health |
title | Iodine concentration of milk-alternative drinks available in the UK in comparison with cows’ milk |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iodine%20concentration%20of%20milk-alternative%20drinks%20available%20in%20the%20UK%20in%20comparison%20with%20cows%E2%80%99%20milk&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Bath,%20Sarah%20C.&rft.date=2017-10-14&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=525-532&rft.issn=0007-1145&rft.eissn=1475-2662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007114517002136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949490794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-602efb80b2129c032ce2cecab76d0613dcc5021fd427a48555f6c449ecf225b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949490794&rft_id=info:pmid/28946925&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007114517002136&rfr_iscdi=true |