Loading…

Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates

Background and Objectives Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. Materials and Methods Target for quantification...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vox sanguinis 2017-11, Vol.112 (8), p.744-750
Main Authors: Doescher, A., Loges, U., Petershofen, E. K., Müller, T. H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3
container_end_page 750
container_issue 8
container_start_page 744
container_title Vox sanguinis
container_volume 112
creator Doescher, A.
Loges, U.
Petershofen, E. K.
Müller, T. H.
description Background and Objectives Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. Materials and Methods Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow‐cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR. Results Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow‐cytometric results from 150 units was −0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study. Conclusion Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow‐cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vox.12566
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945716581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctKAzEUBuAgiq2XhS8gATe6aD1JZjIzSyn1AoIiKu6GTC6Skk5qMlPt2xttdSGYLALJx89PDkJHBMYkrfOl_xgTmnO-hYYko2wEGYFtNATI6KgCKAZoL8YZAJS0zHfRgJYVL9Ieotl0KVwvOutb7A1WwS-c7rCyr7YTDt9PHrDxAb_1ou2ssfJXBh2t6hNxupderjodsW3TtcKN815hqZ3D0rdSt10Q6fkA7Rjhoj7cnPvo6XL6OLke3d5d3UwubkeS5YynvgVoygrOSJYTVkJVCkN4wTgX0nDOFFeEmYbqrGRNDsAqyShVlWyEqZhh--h0nbsI_q3XsavnNn61Ea32faxJleUF4XlJEj35Q2e-D21qlxSHEjLIaVJnayWDjzFoUy-CnYuwqgnUXwOo0wDq7wEke7xJ7Ju5Vr_y58cTOF-Dd-v06v-k-vnuZR35CanrjxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1960804052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Doescher, A. ; Loges, U. ; Petershofen, E. K. ; Müller, T. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doescher, A. ; Loges, U. ; Petershofen, E. K. ; Müller, T. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. Materials and Methods Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow‐cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR. Results Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow‐cytometric results from 150 units was −0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study. Conclusion Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow‐cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vox.12566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28967676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Automation ; Blood ; Blood groups ; Blood Safety ; Cytometry ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; digital droplet PCR ; Dilution ; DNA ; DNA - blood ; DNA - genetics ; Enumeration ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - cytology ; Flow Cytometry ; Humans ; leucocyte counting ; leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates ; Leukocyte Count - methods ; Leukocytes ; Pilot Projects ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Quality Control ; quantitative PCR ; Reproducibility ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Transfusion Reaction - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2017-11, Vol.112 (8), p.744-750</ispartof><rights>2017 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><rights>2017 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5420-9393</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28967676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doescher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loges, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petershofen, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, T. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. Materials and Methods Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow‐cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR. Results Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow‐cytometric results from 150 units was −0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study. Conclusion Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow‐cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood groups</subject><subject>Blood Safety</subject><subject>Cytometry</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>digital droplet PCR</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - blood</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Enumeration</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - cytology</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>leucocyte counting</subject><subject>leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count - methods</subject><subject>Leukocytes</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>quantitative PCR</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Transfusion Reaction - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10ctKAzEUBuAgiq2XhS8gATe6aD1JZjIzSyn1AoIiKu6GTC6Skk5qMlPt2xttdSGYLALJx89PDkJHBMYkrfOl_xgTmnO-hYYko2wEGYFtNATI6KgCKAZoL8YZAJS0zHfRgJYVL9Ieotl0KVwvOutb7A1WwS-c7rCyr7YTDt9PHrDxAb_1ou2ssfJXBh2t6hNxupderjodsW3TtcKN815hqZ3D0rdSt10Q6fkA7Rjhoj7cnPvo6XL6OLke3d5d3UwubkeS5YynvgVoygrOSJYTVkJVCkN4wTgX0nDOFFeEmYbqrGRNDsAqyShVlWyEqZhh--h0nbsI_q3XsavnNn61Ea32faxJleUF4XlJEj35Q2e-D21qlxSHEjLIaVJnayWDjzFoUy-CnYuwqgnUXwOo0wDq7wEke7xJ7Ju5Vr_y58cTOF-Dd-v06v-k-vnuZR35CanrjxA</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Doescher, A.</creator><creator>Loges, U.</creator><creator>Petershofen, E. K.</creator><creator>Müller, T. H.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-9393</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates</title><author>Doescher, A. ; Loges, U. ; Petershofen, E. K. ; Müller, T. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood groups</topic><topic>Blood Safety</topic><topic>Cytometry</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>digital droplet PCR</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - blood</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Enumeration</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - cytology</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>leucocyte counting</topic><topic>leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count - methods</topic><topic>Leukocytes</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>quantitative PCR</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Transfusion Reaction - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doescher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loges, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petershofen, E. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, T. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doescher, A.</au><au>Loges, U.</au><au>Petershofen, E. K.</au><au>Müller, T. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>744</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>744-750</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. Materials and Methods Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow‐cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR. Results Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow‐cytometric results from 150 units was −0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study. Conclusion Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow‐cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>28967676</pmid><doi>10.1111/vox.12566</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-9393</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-9007
ispartof Vox sanguinis, 2017-11, Vol.112 (8), p.744-750
issn 0042-9007
1423-0410
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1945716581
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Automation
Blood
Blood groups
Blood Safety
Cytometry
Deoxyribonucleic acid
digital droplet PCR
Dilution
DNA
DNA - blood
DNA - genetics
Enumeration
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Erythrocytes
Erythrocytes - cytology
Flow Cytometry
Humans
leucocyte counting
leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates
Leukocyte Count - methods
Leukocytes
Pilot Projects
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Quality Control
quantitative PCR
Reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Transfusion Reaction - prevention & control
title Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A24%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20droplet%20digital%20PCR%20for%20quantification%20of%20residual%20leucocytes%20in%20red%20blood%20cell%20concentrates&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Doescher,%20A.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=744&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=744-750&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vox.12566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1945716581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9070e23763145138098af167366acf663d6d13fb2e483b50039c322d9cbaf93f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1960804052&rft_id=info:pmid/28967676&rfr_iscdi=true