Loading…
Sonography‐guided recording for superficial peroneal sensory nerve conduction study
ABSTRACT Introduction We sought to establish the optimal recording position for antidromic conduction of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) by using ultrasonography (USG). Methods The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (IDCN) and medial dorsal cutane...
Saved in:
Published in: | Muscle & nerve 2018-04, Vol.57 (4), p.628-633 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Introduction
We sought to establish the optimal recording position for antidromic conduction of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) by using ultrasonography (USG).
Methods
The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (IDCN) and medial dorsal cutaneous nerve (MDCN) in 64 limbs of 32 healthy participants were recorded (nerve conduction study [NCS]‐1). Both nerves were identified by using USG, and the SNAPs were obtained from the USG‐guided repositioned electrodes (NCS‐2).
Results
The IDCN and MDCN were located at 29.3% ± 5.1% and 43.9% ± 4.9% of the intermalleolar distance from the lateral malleolus, respectively. Significantly greater amplitude was shown for SNAPs of both nerves in NCS‐2 versus NCS‐1.
Discussion
The optimal recording position is likely to be lateral, one‐third from the lateral malleolus for the IDCN, and just lateral to the midpoint of the intermalleolar line for the MDCN. When the SPN response is unexpectedly attenuated, USG‐guided repositioning of the electrodes should be considered. Muscle Nerve 57: 628–633, 2018 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mus.25978 |