Loading…

Sonography‐guided recording for superficial peroneal sensory nerve conduction study

ABSTRACT Introduction We sought to establish the optimal recording position for antidromic conduction of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) by using ultrasonography (USG). Methods The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (IDCN) and medial dorsal cutane...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Muscle & nerve 2018-04, Vol.57 (4), p.628-633
Main Authors: Kim, Ki Hoon, Park, Byung Kyu, Kim, Dong Hwee, Kim, Yuntae
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Introduction We sought to establish the optimal recording position for antidromic conduction of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) by using ultrasonography (USG). Methods The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) of the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (IDCN) and medial dorsal cutaneous nerve (MDCN) in 64 limbs of 32 healthy participants were recorded (nerve conduction study [NCS]‐1). Both nerves were identified by using USG, and the SNAPs were obtained from the USG‐guided repositioned electrodes (NCS‐2). Results The IDCN and MDCN were located at 29.3% ± 5.1% and 43.9% ± 4.9% of the intermalleolar distance from the lateral malleolus, respectively. Significantly greater amplitude was shown for SNAPs of both nerves in NCS‐2 versus NCS‐1. Discussion The optimal recording position is likely to be lateral, one‐third from the lateral malleolus for the IDCN, and just lateral to the midpoint of the intermalleolar line for the MDCN. When the SPN response is unexpectedly attenuated, USG‐guided repositioning of the electrodes should be considered. Muscle Nerve 57: 628–633, 2018
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.25978