In Situ Bioreactors and Deep Drain-Pipe Installation to Reduce Nitrate Losses in Artificially Drained Fields

• Published in: Journal of environmental quality 2008-03, Vol.37 (2), p.429-436
• Main Authors: Jaynes, D.B, Kaspar, T.C, Moorman, T.B, Parkin, T.B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural practices; Agriculture - methods; Anaerobiosis; Bioreactors; Carbon sources; Contaminants; Contamination; corn; Crop rotation; Crop yield; Denitrification; Drainage systems; Drainage, Sanitary - methods; Drinking water; Effectiveness; extraction; Farms; Field study; Flow rates; Glycine max; grain yield; hydrology; Hypoxia; Ion exchange; Loam soils; Nitrates; Nitrates - analysis; Nitrates - metabolism; Soil surfaces; Soybeans; Subsurface drainage; Subsurface drains; Surface water; Systems design; Tile drainage; Tile drains; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism; water pollution; Water Pollution - prevention & control; Water quality; Zea mays
• ISSN: 0047-2425; 1537-2537
• DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0279

Received for publication May 31, 2007. Nitrate in water removed from fields by subsurface drain ('tile') systems is often at concentrations exceeding the 10 mg N L1 maximum contaminant level (MCL) set by the USEPA for drinking water and has been implicated in contributing to the hypoxia problem within the northern Gulf of Mexico. Because previous research shows that N fertilizer management alone is not sufficient for reducing NO3 concentrations in subsurface drainage below the MCL, additional approaches are needed. In this field study, we compared the NO3 losses in tile drainage from a conventional drainage system (CN) consisting of a free-flowing pipe installed 1.2 m below the soil surface to losses in tile drainage from two alternative drainage designs. The alternative treatments were a deep tile (DT), where the tile drain was installed 0.6 m deeper than the conventional tile depth, but with the outlet maintained at 1.2 m, and a denitrification wall (DW), where trenches excavated parallel to the tile and filled with woodchips serve as additional carbon sources to increase denitrification. Four replicate 30.5- by 42.7-m field plots were installed for each treatment in 1999 and a corn-soybean rotation initiated in 2000. Over 5 yr (2001-2005) the tile flow from the DW treatment had annual average NO3 concentrations significantly lower than the CN treatment (8.8 vs. 22.1 mg N L-1). This represented an annual reduction in NO3 mass loss of 29 kg N ha-1 or a 55% reduction in nitrate mass lost in tile drainage for the DW treatment. The DT treatment did not consistently lower NO3 concentrations, nor reduce the annual NO3 mass loss in drainage. The DT treatment did exhibit lower NO3 concentrations in tile drainage than the CN treatment during late summer when tile flow rates were minimal. There was no difference in crop yields for any of the treatments. Thus, denitrification walls are able to substantially reduce NO3 concentrations in tile drainage for at least 5 yr.