Sinkhole structure imaging in covered Karst terrain

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity techniques have been widely used to map the locations of sinkholes in covered karst terrain. To determine whether a sinkhole is a likely preferential conduit for groundwater flow, however, requires higher‐resolution imaging than that used in conventiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2006-08, Vol.33 (16), p.n/a
Main Authors: Kruse, S., Grasmueck, M., Weiss, M., Viggiano, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity techniques have been widely used to map the locations of sinkholes in covered karst terrain. To determine whether a sinkhole is a likely preferential conduit for groundwater flow, however, requires higher‐resolution imaging than that used in conventional sinkhole mapping surveys. Field observations combined with simulated surveys for a 15‐m diameter 3‐m deep sinkhole in west‐central Florida are used to assess the resolution of GPR and resistivity surveys targeting the semiconfining unit that floors the sinkhole depression. 2D resistivity surveys clearly show the central depression as well as resistivity contrasts between the cover sediments within and outside of the sinkhole, but are inadequate for resolving breaches in the semiconfining unit or underlying conduits. A 3D GPR survey resolves vertical structure on the order of tens of centimeters within the semiconfining unit, as well as indicators of conduits that extend several meters beneath the central depression. 3D GPR thus holds promise for imaging hydrologically significant features of sinkholes.
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/2006GL026975