Meta-Analysis of Studies of Alcohol and Breast Cancer with Consideration of the Methodological Issues

• Published in: Cancer causes & control 2006-08, Vol.17 (6), p.759-770
• Main Authors: Key, Jane, Hodgson, Susan, Omar, Rumana Z., Jensen, Tina K., Thompson, Simon G., Boobis, Alan R., Davies, Donald S., Elliott, Paul
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alcohol; Alcohol drinking; Alcohol Drinking - adverse effects; Alcohol-Related Disorders - complications; Alcoholic beverages; Alcohols; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - etiology; Case control studies; Cohort analysis; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology); Dose response relationship; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Energy intake; Epidemiology; Estimates; Ethanol; Female; Grey literature; Hormone replacement therapy; Humans; Incidence; Meta analysis; Population estimates; Public health; Publication Bias; Risk Factors; Science
• ISSN: 0957-5243; 1573-7225
• DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0011-0

Objective To give an up-to-date assessment of the association of alcohol with female breast cancer, addressing methodological issues and shortfalls in previous overviews. Methods Meta-analysis of studies (any language) providing original data on incidence of first primary breast cancer and alcohol. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Study quality assessed by objective criteria including degree of control for confounding; funnel plots examined for publication bias; meta-regression techniques to explore heterogeneity. Risks associated with drinking versus not drinking and dose-response not constrained through the origin estimated using random effects methods. Results Ninety-eight unique studies were included, involving 75,728 and 60,653 cases in drinker versus non-drinker and dose-response analyses, respectively. Findings were robust to study design and analytic approaches in the meta-analyses. For studies judged high quality, controlled for appropriate confounders, excess risk associated with alcohol drinking was 22% (95% CI: 9-37%); each additional 10 g ethanol/day was associated with risk higher by 10% (95% CI: 5-15%). There was no evidence of publication bias. Risk did not differ significantly by beverage type or menopausal status. Estimated population attributable risks were 1.6 and 6.0% in USA and UK, respectively. Conclusions Taking account of shortcomings in the study base and methodological concerns, we confirm the alcohol-breast cancer association. We compared our results to those of an individual patient data analysis, with similar findings. We conclude that the association between alcohol and breast cancer may be causal.