Loading…

Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions

The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electric...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997
Main Authors: Hittinger, Eric, Azevedo, Inês M. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13
container_end_page 12997
container_issue 21
container_start_page 12988
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 51
creator Hittinger, Eric
Azevedo, Inês M. L.
description The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.7b03286
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950177067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950177067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAURoMoOj7W7iTgRpCOuYl5dCk6PkAQX-iu3DapVjrNTNIu_PdmmFFBcBHuIuf77uUQsg9sDIzDCVZx7GI_1iUT3Kg1MgLJWSaNhHUyYgxElgv1ukW2Y_xgjHHBzCbZ4jkDBTwfkddJ7Jsp9k33Rvt3R-8H7Pqm_6S-pi9NZymm9-hbDPTBzYcmOEufPL1o4qzFytHH3gd8c9lNZ4cq_U2mTYyN7-Iu2aixjW5vNXfI8-Xk6fw6u727ujk_u81QKOgzUwqTS4u8siXq0gJK4LVFVytutVOWOYPaqBIUitoAmlKW0urTHHQOFYgdcrTsnQU_H5KLIl1QubbFzvkhFpBLBlozpRN6-Af98EPo0nWJSsaE0acyUSdLqgo-xuDqYhaSofBZACsW0oskvVikV9JT4mDVO5RTZ3_4b8sJOF4Ci-Tvzn_qvgDbMYzD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985138745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><description>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29016129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Clean technology ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy storage ; Michigan ; Montana ; Renewable Energy ; Renewable resources ; Solar energy ; Storage facilities ; Wind ; Wind power ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Nov 7, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Storage facilities</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAURoMoOj7W7iTgRpCOuYl5dCk6PkAQX-iu3DapVjrNTNIu_PdmmFFBcBHuIuf77uUQsg9sDIzDCVZx7GI_1iUT3Kg1MgLJWSaNhHUyYgxElgv1ukW2Y_xgjHHBzCbZ4jkDBTwfkddJ7Jsp9k33Rvt3R-8H7Pqm_6S-pi9NZymm9-hbDPTBzYcmOEufPL1o4qzFytHH3gd8c9lNZ4cq_U2mTYyN7-Iu2aixjW5vNXfI8-Xk6fw6u727ujk_u81QKOgzUwqTS4u8siXq0gJK4LVFVytutVOWOYPaqBIUitoAmlKW0urTHHQOFYgdcrTsnQU_H5KLIl1QubbFzvkhFpBLBlozpRN6-Af98EPo0nWJSsaE0acyUSdLqgo-xuDqYhaSofBZACsW0oskvVikV9JT4mDVO5RTZ3_4b8sJOF4Ci-Tvzn_qvgDbMYzD</recordid><startdate>20171107</startdate><enddate>20171107</enddate><creator>Hittinger, Eric</creator><creator>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171107</creationdate><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><author>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Storage facilities</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hittinger, Eric</au><au>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2017-11-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>12988</spage><epage>12997</epage><pages>12988-12997</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>29016129</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.7b03286</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950177067
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Alabama
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Clean technology
Electricity
Emissions
Emissions control
Energy storage
Michigan
Montana
Renewable Energy
Renewable resources
Solar energy
Storage facilities
Wind
Wind power
Wind power generation
title Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A17%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20Quantity%20of%20Wind%20and%20Solar%20Required%20To%20Displace%20Storage-Induced%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hittinger,%20Eric&rft.date=2017-11-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=12988&rft.epage=12997&rft.pages=12988-12997&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.7b03286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1950177067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985138745&rft_id=info:pmid/29016129&rfr_iscdi=true