Loading…
Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions
The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electric...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental science & technology 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13 |
container_end_page | 12997 |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 12988 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Hittinger, Eric Azevedo, Inês M. L. |
description | The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.est.7b03286 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950177067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950177067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAURoMoOj7W7iTgRpCOuYl5dCk6PkAQX-iu3DapVjrNTNIu_PdmmFFBcBHuIuf77uUQsg9sDIzDCVZx7GI_1iUT3Kg1MgLJWSaNhHUyYgxElgv1ukW2Y_xgjHHBzCbZ4jkDBTwfkddJ7Jsp9k33Rvt3R-8H7Pqm_6S-pi9NZymm9-hbDPTBzYcmOEufPL1o4qzFytHH3gd8c9lNZ4cq_U2mTYyN7-Iu2aixjW5vNXfI8-Xk6fw6u727ujk_u81QKOgzUwqTS4u8siXq0gJK4LVFVytutVOWOYPaqBIUitoAmlKW0urTHHQOFYgdcrTsnQU_H5KLIl1QubbFzvkhFpBLBlozpRN6-Af98EPo0nWJSsaE0acyUSdLqgo-xuDqYhaSofBZACsW0oskvVikV9JT4mDVO5RTZ3_4b8sJOF4Ci-Tvzn_qvgDbMYzD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985138745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><description>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29016129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Clean technology ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy storage ; Michigan ; Montana ; Renewable Energy ; Renewable resources ; Solar energy ; Storage facilities ; Wind ; Wind power ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Nov 7, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Storage facilities</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAURoMoOj7W7iTgRpCOuYl5dCk6PkAQX-iu3DapVjrNTNIu_PdmmFFBcBHuIuf77uUQsg9sDIzDCVZx7GI_1iUT3Kg1MgLJWSaNhHUyYgxElgv1ukW2Y_xgjHHBzCbZ4jkDBTwfkddJ7Jsp9k33Rvt3R-8H7Pqm_6S-pi9NZymm9-hbDPTBzYcmOEufPL1o4qzFytHH3gd8c9lNZ4cq_U2mTYyN7-Iu2aixjW5vNXfI8-Xk6fw6u727ujk_u81QKOgzUwqTS4u8siXq0gJK4LVFVytutVOWOYPaqBIUitoAmlKW0urTHHQOFYgdcrTsnQU_H5KLIl1QubbFzvkhFpBLBlozpRN6-Af98EPo0nWJSsaE0acyUSdLqgo-xuDqYhaSofBZACsW0oskvVikV9JT4mDVO5RTZ3_4b8sJOF4Ci-Tvzn_qvgDbMYzD</recordid><startdate>20171107</startdate><enddate>20171107</enddate><creator>Hittinger, Eric</creator><creator>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171107</creationdate><title>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</title><author>Hittinger, Eric ; Azevedo, Inês M. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Storage facilities</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hittinger, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hittinger, Eric</au><au>Azevedo, Inês M. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2017-11-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>12988</spage><epage>12997</epage><pages>12988-12997</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>The variable and nondispatchable nature of wind and solar generation has been driving interest in energy storage as an enabling low-carbon technology that can help spur large-scale adoption of renewables. However, prior work has shown that adding energy storage alone for energy arbitrage in electricity systems across the U.S. routinely increases system emissions. While adding wind or solar reduces electricity system emissions, the emissions effect of both renewable generation and energy storage varies by location. In this work, we apply a marginal emissions approach to determine the net system CO2 emissions of colocated or electrically proximate wind/storage and solar/storage facilities across the U.S. and determine the amount of renewable energy required to offset the CO2 emissions resulting from operation of new energy storage. We find that it takes between 0.03 MW (Montana) and 4 MW (Michigan) of wind and between 0.25 MW (Alabama) and 17 MW (Michigan) of solar to offset the emissions from a 25 MW/100 MWh storage device, depending on location and operational mode. Systems with a realistic combination of renewables and storage will result in net emissions reductions compared with a grid without those systems, but the anticipated reductions are lower than a renewable-only addition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>29016129</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.7b03286</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-4016</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2017-11, Vol.51 (21), p.12988-12997 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950177067 |
source | American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list) |
subjects | Alabama Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Clean technology Electricity Emissions Emissions control Energy storage Michigan Montana Renewable Energy Renewable resources Solar energy Storage facilities Wind Wind power Wind power generation |
title | Estimating the Quantity of Wind and Solar Required To Displace Storage-Induced Emissions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A17%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20Quantity%20of%20Wind%20and%20Solar%20Required%20To%20Displace%20Storage-Induced%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hittinger,%20Eric&rft.date=2017-11-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=12988&rft.epage=12997&rft.pages=12988-12997&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.7b03286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1950177067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-8b3895da2cdba7bd1a512fdaef62d7e6d0e8a786b16a3f81a8b5b5d7491791c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985138745&rft_id=info:pmid/29016129&rfr_iscdi=true |