Loading…

Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation

To support decision-making regarding prosthetic valve selection in non-elderly adults, we aim to provide a detailed overview of outcome after contemporary mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR). A systematic review was conducted for papers reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bileaflet mecha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal 2017-12, Vol.38 (45), p.3370-3377
Main Authors: Korteland, Nelleke M, Etnel, Jonathan R G, Arabkhani, Bardia, Mokhles, M Mostafa, Mohamad, Arezo, Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W, Bogers, Ad J J C, Takkenberg, Johanna J M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123
container_end_page 3377
container_issue 45
container_start_page 3370
container_title European heart journal
container_volume 38
creator Korteland, Nelleke M
Etnel, Jonathan R G
Arabkhani, Bardia
Mokhles, M Mostafa
Mohamad, Arezo
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W
Bogers, Ad J J C
Takkenberg, Johanna J M
description To support decision-making regarding prosthetic valve selection in non-elderly adults, we aim to provide a detailed overview of outcome after contemporary mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR). A systematic review was conducted for papers reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bileaflet mechanical valves with a mean patient age ≥18 and ≤55 years, published between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2015. Through meta-analysis outcomes were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model to calculate (event-free) life expectancy and lifetime event risk. Twenty-nine publications, encompassing a total of 5728 patients with 32 515 patient-years of follow-up (pooled mean follow-up: 5.7 years), were included. Pooled mean age at surgery was 48.0 years. Pooled early mortality risk was 3.15% (95% confidence interval (CI):2.37-4.23), late mortality rate was 1.55%/year (95%CI:1.25-1.92); 38.7% of late deaths were valve-related. Pooled thromboembolism rate was 0.90%/year (95%CI:0.68-1.21), major bleeding 0.85%/year (95%CI:0.65-1.12), nonstructural valve dysfunction 0.39%/year (95%CI:0.21-0.76), endocarditis 0.41%/year (95%CI:0.29-0.57), valve thrombosis 0.14%/year (95%CI:0.08-0.25), structural valve deterioration 0.00%/year (zero events observed), and reintervention 0.51%/year (95%CI:0.37-0.71), mostly due to nonstructural valve dysfunction and endocarditis. For a 45-year-old, for example, this translated to an estimated life expectancy of 19 years (general population: 34 years) and lifetime risks of thromboembolism, bleeding and reintervention of 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. This study demonstrates that outcome after mechanical AVR in non-elderly adults is characterized by suboptimal survival and considerable lifetime risk of anticoagulation-related complications, but also reoperation. Non-elderly adult patients who are facing prosthetic valve selection are entitled to conveyance of evidence-based estimates of the risks and benefits of both mechanical and biological valve options in a shared decision-making process.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx199
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1953297727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1953297727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgitbH3pVk6WZskskkjTspvqDiRsGFMNxJbmkkk6nJTLH_3kprV3dzzuHyEXLJ2Q1nphzjkBYIqf8a4-KHG3NARrwSojBKVodkxLipCqUmHyfkNOcvxthEcXVMToRhslJSj8jnC9oFRG8hUOhS7y1dQVghTbgMYLHF2FMfaexigcFhCmsKbgh9vqUt9lBAhLDOPlOIjrbepi77dgjQ-y6ek6M5hIwXu3tG3h_u36ZPxez18Xl6NytsKXlflM66xjTalZzrChrnDJ-zRs5NpYFbIyshS9GgU1JUzirJ0RmtmkYLPnFclGfkeru7TN33gLmvW58thgARuyHXG4ZSGK2F3kTZNvr3aE44r5fJt5DWNWf1n2m9N623ppvK1W59aFp0-8I_YvkL18l36A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1953297727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Korteland, Nelleke M ; Etnel, Jonathan R G ; Arabkhani, Bardia ; Mokhles, M Mostafa ; Mohamad, Arezo ; Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W ; Bogers, Ad J J C ; Takkenberg, Johanna J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Korteland, Nelleke M ; Etnel, Jonathan R G ; Arabkhani, Bardia ; Mokhles, M Mostafa ; Mohamad, Arezo ; Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W ; Bogers, Ad J J C ; Takkenberg, Johanna J M</creatorcontrib><description>To support decision-making regarding prosthetic valve selection in non-elderly adults, we aim to provide a detailed overview of outcome after contemporary mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR). A systematic review was conducted for papers reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bileaflet mechanical valves with a mean patient age ≥18 and ≤55 years, published between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2015. Through meta-analysis outcomes were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model to calculate (event-free) life expectancy and lifetime event risk. Twenty-nine publications, encompassing a total of 5728 patients with 32 515 patient-years of follow-up (pooled mean follow-up: 5.7 years), were included. Pooled mean age at surgery was 48.0 years. Pooled early mortality risk was 3.15% (95% confidence interval (CI):2.37-4.23), late mortality rate was 1.55%/year (95%CI:1.25-1.92); 38.7% of late deaths were valve-related. Pooled thromboembolism rate was 0.90%/year (95%CI:0.68-1.21), major bleeding 0.85%/year (95%CI:0.65-1.12), nonstructural valve dysfunction 0.39%/year (95%CI:0.21-0.76), endocarditis 0.41%/year (95%CI:0.29-0.57), valve thrombosis 0.14%/year (95%CI:0.08-0.25), structural valve deterioration 0.00%/year (zero events observed), and reintervention 0.51%/year (95%CI:0.37-0.71), mostly due to nonstructural valve dysfunction and endocarditis. For a 45-year-old, for example, this translated to an estimated life expectancy of 19 years (general population: 34 years) and lifetime risks of thromboembolism, bleeding and reintervention of 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. This study demonstrates that outcome after mechanical AVR in non-elderly adults is characterized by suboptimal survival and considerable lifetime risk of anticoagulation-related complications, but also reoperation. Non-elderly adult patients who are facing prosthetic valve selection are entitled to conveyance of evidence-based estimates of the risks and benefits of both mechanical and biological valve options in a shared decision-making process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-668X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29045647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Female ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European heart journal, 2017-12, Vol.38 (45), p.3370-3377</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29045647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korteland, Nelleke M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etnel, Jonathan R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabkhani, Bardia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokhles, M Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamad, Arezo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogers, Ad J J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takkenberg, Johanna J M</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation</title><title>European heart journal</title><addtitle>Eur Heart J</addtitle><description>To support decision-making regarding prosthetic valve selection in non-elderly adults, we aim to provide a detailed overview of outcome after contemporary mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR). A systematic review was conducted for papers reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bileaflet mechanical valves with a mean patient age ≥18 and ≤55 years, published between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2015. Through meta-analysis outcomes were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model to calculate (event-free) life expectancy and lifetime event risk. Twenty-nine publications, encompassing a total of 5728 patients with 32 515 patient-years of follow-up (pooled mean follow-up: 5.7 years), were included. Pooled mean age at surgery was 48.0 years. Pooled early mortality risk was 3.15% (95% confidence interval (CI):2.37-4.23), late mortality rate was 1.55%/year (95%CI:1.25-1.92); 38.7% of late deaths were valve-related. Pooled thromboembolism rate was 0.90%/year (95%CI:0.68-1.21), major bleeding 0.85%/year (95%CI:0.65-1.12), nonstructural valve dysfunction 0.39%/year (95%CI:0.21-0.76), endocarditis 0.41%/year (95%CI:0.29-0.57), valve thrombosis 0.14%/year (95%CI:0.08-0.25), structural valve deterioration 0.00%/year (zero events observed), and reintervention 0.51%/year (95%CI:0.37-0.71), mostly due to nonstructural valve dysfunction and endocarditis. For a 45-year-old, for example, this translated to an estimated life expectancy of 19 years (general population: 34 years) and lifetime risks of thromboembolism, bleeding and reintervention of 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. This study demonstrates that outcome after mechanical AVR in non-elderly adults is characterized by suboptimal survival and considerable lifetime risk of anticoagulation-related complications, but also reoperation. Non-elderly adult patients who are facing prosthetic valve selection are entitled to conveyance of evidence-based estimates of the risks and benefits of both mechanical and biological valve options in a shared decision-making process.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0195-668X</issn><issn>1522-9645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgitbH3pVk6WZskskkjTspvqDiRsGFMNxJbmkkk6nJTLH_3kprV3dzzuHyEXLJ2Q1nphzjkBYIqf8a4-KHG3NARrwSojBKVodkxLipCqUmHyfkNOcvxthEcXVMToRhslJSj8jnC9oFRG8hUOhS7y1dQVghTbgMYLHF2FMfaexigcFhCmsKbgh9vqUt9lBAhLDOPlOIjrbepi77dgjQ-y6ek6M5hIwXu3tG3h_u36ZPxez18Xl6NytsKXlflM66xjTalZzrChrnDJ-zRs5NpYFbIyshS9GgU1JUzirJ0RmtmkYLPnFclGfkeru7TN33gLmvW58thgARuyHXG4ZSGK2F3kTZNvr3aE44r5fJt5DWNWf1n2m9N623ppvK1W59aFp0-8I_YvkL18l36A</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Korteland, Nelleke M</creator><creator>Etnel, Jonathan R G</creator><creator>Arabkhani, Bardia</creator><creator>Mokhles, M Mostafa</creator><creator>Mohamad, Arezo</creator><creator>Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W</creator><creator>Bogers, Ad J J C</creator><creator>Takkenberg, Johanna J M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation</title><author>Korteland, Nelleke M ; Etnel, Jonathan R G ; Arabkhani, Bardia ; Mokhles, M Mostafa ; Mohamad, Arezo ; Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W ; Bogers, Ad J J C ; Takkenberg, Johanna J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korteland, Nelleke M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etnel, Jonathan R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabkhani, Bardia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokhles, M Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamad, Arezo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogers, Ad J J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takkenberg, Johanna J M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korteland, Nelleke M</au><au>Etnel, Jonathan R G</au><au>Arabkhani, Bardia</au><au>Mokhles, M Mostafa</au><au>Mohamad, Arezo</au><au>Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W</au><au>Bogers, Ad J J C</au><au>Takkenberg, Johanna J M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Heart J</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>45</issue><spage>3370</spage><epage>3377</epage><pages>3370-3377</pages><issn>0195-668X</issn><eissn>1522-9645</eissn><abstract>To support decision-making regarding prosthetic valve selection in non-elderly adults, we aim to provide a detailed overview of outcome after contemporary mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR). A systematic review was conducted for papers reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bileaflet mechanical valves with a mean patient age ≥18 and ≤55 years, published between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2015. Through meta-analysis outcomes were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model to calculate (event-free) life expectancy and lifetime event risk. Twenty-nine publications, encompassing a total of 5728 patients with 32 515 patient-years of follow-up (pooled mean follow-up: 5.7 years), were included. Pooled mean age at surgery was 48.0 years. Pooled early mortality risk was 3.15% (95% confidence interval (CI):2.37-4.23), late mortality rate was 1.55%/year (95%CI:1.25-1.92); 38.7% of late deaths were valve-related. Pooled thromboembolism rate was 0.90%/year (95%CI:0.68-1.21), major bleeding 0.85%/year (95%CI:0.65-1.12), nonstructural valve dysfunction 0.39%/year (95%CI:0.21-0.76), endocarditis 0.41%/year (95%CI:0.29-0.57), valve thrombosis 0.14%/year (95%CI:0.08-0.25), structural valve deterioration 0.00%/year (zero events observed), and reintervention 0.51%/year (95%CI:0.37-0.71), mostly due to nonstructural valve dysfunction and endocarditis. For a 45-year-old, for example, this translated to an estimated life expectancy of 19 years (general population: 34 years) and lifetime risks of thromboembolism, bleeding and reintervention of 18%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. This study demonstrates that outcome after mechanical AVR in non-elderly adults is characterized by suboptimal survival and considerable lifetime risk of anticoagulation-related complications, but also reoperation. Non-elderly adult patients who are facing prosthetic valve selection are entitled to conveyance of evidence-based estimates of the risks and benefits of both mechanical and biological valve options in a shared decision-making process.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29045647</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurheartj/ehx199</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-668X
ispartof European heart journal, 2017-12, Vol.38 (45), p.3370-3377
issn 0195-668X
1522-9645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1953297727
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
title Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20aortic%20valve%20replacement%20in%20non-elderly%20adults:%20meta-analysis%20and%20microsimulation&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Korteland,%20Nelleke%20M&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=45&rft.spage=3370&rft.epage=3377&rft.pages=3370-3377&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1953297727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3dcdb9b7d31175abdd91f0b4f957a1c9452432bed6425dc641ed976bb7218d123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1953297727&rft_id=info:pmid/29045647&rfr_iscdi=true