Loading…

Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions

All spatio-temporal grain-size patterns in sediments can be characterized by a mathematical representation of (un)mixing. This implies that an inverse model of (un)mixing would be ideally suited to obtain genetically meaningful interpretations of observed grain-size distributions (GSDs). GSDs are th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sedimentary geology 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.409-424
Main Authors: Weltje, Gert Jan, Prins, Maarten A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3
container_end_page 424
container_issue 3
container_start_page 409
container_title Sedimentary geology
container_volume 202
creator Weltje, Gert Jan
Prins, Maarten A.
description All spatio-temporal grain-size patterns in sediments can be characterized by a mathematical representation of (un)mixing. This implies that an inverse model of (un)mixing would be ideally suited to obtain genetically meaningful interpretations of observed grain-size distributions (GSDs). GSDs are therefore often decomposed into theoretical end members by parametric curve-fitting procedures. Many researchers have been tempted to use goodness-of-fit measures as a means of justifying such decompositions in the absence of generic process-based models of end-member GSDs. A critical examination of parametric curve fitting through a series of numerical experiments shows that the goodness-of-fit of an approximation may be a poor guide to its genetic significance. The genetic interpretation of GSDs is a poorly constrained problem that cannot be solved without taking into account the geological context of GSDs, which may be captured by the covariance structure of grain-size classes across a series of GSDs sampled in a contiguous area. Curve-fitting methods cannot exploit this geological context, which explains why the geological relevance of curve-fitting results obtained in black-box mode is questionable. The desired genetic interpretation of GSDs can be obtained by applying the end-member-modelling algorithm EMMA to a series of GSDs simultaneously. Many end-member GSDs estimated by EMMA do not conform to one of the popular theoretical GSD models. Consequently, parametric curve fitting with theoretical distributions is more likely to obscure than to reveal the existence of genetically significant grain-size populations in sediments, especially if such populations are present in small proportions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19533317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003707380700139X</els_id><sourcerecordid>19533317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhT2ARCn8A4ZMbAnnuIndBYEqKEiVWGC2XPtcXZXExU6Qyq8nVZg7Pende0-6j7E7DgUHXj_si4Ruh6EoAWQBohjlgs0AhMxBCnXFrlPaw-gqCTP2tMYOe7KmaY5Zi6ajbueHJnNoQ3sIiXoKXRZ8touGujzRL2aOUh9pO5xO6YZdetMkvP3XOft6fflcveWbj_X76nmTG1FDn4tKedxyLy13aomVrJxYWq4WpjbKlpb7SnIQqvTOlqasvXIGraiNAGV5acSc3U-7hxi-B0y9bilZbBrTYRiS5stKCMHlGFxMQRtDShG9PkRqTTxqDvqESO_1hEifEGkQepSx9jjVcHzihzDqZAk7i44i2l67QOcH_gCGknSz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19533317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Weltje, Gert Jan ; Prins, Maarten A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weltje, Gert Jan ; Prins, Maarten A.</creatorcontrib><description>All spatio-temporal grain-size patterns in sediments can be characterized by a mathematical representation of (un)mixing. This implies that an inverse model of (un)mixing would be ideally suited to obtain genetically meaningful interpretations of observed grain-size distributions (GSDs). GSDs are therefore often decomposed into theoretical end members by parametric curve-fitting procedures. Many researchers have been tempted to use goodness-of-fit measures as a means of justifying such decompositions in the absence of generic process-based models of end-member GSDs. A critical examination of parametric curve fitting through a series of numerical experiments shows that the goodness-of-fit of an approximation may be a poor guide to its genetic significance. The genetic interpretation of GSDs is a poorly constrained problem that cannot be solved without taking into account the geological context of GSDs, which may be captured by the covariance structure of grain-size classes across a series of GSDs sampled in a contiguous area. Curve-fitting methods cannot exploit this geological context, which explains why the geological relevance of curve-fitting results obtained in black-box mode is questionable. The desired genetic interpretation of GSDs can be obtained by applying the end-member-modelling algorithm EMMA to a series of GSDs simultaneously. Many end-member GSDs estimated by EMMA do not conform to one of the popular theoretical GSD models. Consequently, parametric curve fitting with theoretical distributions is more likely to obscure than to reveal the existence of genetically significant grain-size populations in sediments, especially if such populations are present in small proportions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Curve fitting ; End-member modelling ; Grain-size distribution ; Mixing ; Unmixing</subject><ispartof>Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.409-424</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weltje, Gert Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, Maarten A.</creatorcontrib><title>Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions</title><title>Sedimentary geology</title><description>All spatio-temporal grain-size patterns in sediments can be characterized by a mathematical representation of (un)mixing. This implies that an inverse model of (un)mixing would be ideally suited to obtain genetically meaningful interpretations of observed grain-size distributions (GSDs). GSDs are therefore often decomposed into theoretical end members by parametric curve-fitting procedures. Many researchers have been tempted to use goodness-of-fit measures as a means of justifying such decompositions in the absence of generic process-based models of end-member GSDs. A critical examination of parametric curve fitting through a series of numerical experiments shows that the goodness-of-fit of an approximation may be a poor guide to its genetic significance. The genetic interpretation of GSDs is a poorly constrained problem that cannot be solved without taking into account the geological context of GSDs, which may be captured by the covariance structure of grain-size classes across a series of GSDs sampled in a contiguous area. Curve-fitting methods cannot exploit this geological context, which explains why the geological relevance of curve-fitting results obtained in black-box mode is questionable. The desired genetic interpretation of GSDs can be obtained by applying the end-member-modelling algorithm EMMA to a series of GSDs simultaneously. Many end-member GSDs estimated by EMMA do not conform to one of the popular theoretical GSD models. Consequently, parametric curve fitting with theoretical distributions is more likely to obscure than to reveal the existence of genetically significant grain-size populations in sediments, especially if such populations are present in small proportions.</description><subject>Curve fitting</subject><subject>End-member modelling</subject><subject>Grain-size distribution</subject><subject>Mixing</subject><subject>Unmixing</subject><issn>0037-0738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQhT2ARCn8A4ZMbAnnuIndBYEqKEiVWGC2XPtcXZXExU6Qyq8nVZg7Pende0-6j7E7DgUHXj_si4Ruh6EoAWQBohjlgs0AhMxBCnXFrlPaw-gqCTP2tMYOe7KmaY5Zi6ajbueHJnNoQ3sIiXoKXRZ8touGujzRL2aOUh9pO5xO6YZdetMkvP3XOft6fflcveWbj_X76nmTG1FDn4tKedxyLy13aomVrJxYWq4WpjbKlpb7SnIQqvTOlqasvXIGraiNAGV5acSc3U-7hxi-B0y9bilZbBrTYRiS5stKCMHlGFxMQRtDShG9PkRqTTxqDvqESO_1hEifEGkQepSx9jjVcHzihzDqZAk7i44i2l67QOcH_gCGknSz</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Weltje, Gert Jan</creator><creator>Prins, Maarten A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions</title><author>Weltje, Gert Jan ; Prins, Maarten A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Curve fitting</topic><topic>End-member modelling</topic><topic>Grain-size distribution</topic><topic>Mixing</topic><topic>Unmixing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weltje, Gert Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, Maarten A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weltje, Gert Jan</au><au>Prins, Maarten A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentary geology</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>202</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>409-424</pages><issn>0037-0738</issn><abstract>All spatio-temporal grain-size patterns in sediments can be characterized by a mathematical representation of (un)mixing. This implies that an inverse model of (un)mixing would be ideally suited to obtain genetically meaningful interpretations of observed grain-size distributions (GSDs). GSDs are therefore often decomposed into theoretical end members by parametric curve-fitting procedures. Many researchers have been tempted to use goodness-of-fit measures as a means of justifying such decompositions in the absence of generic process-based models of end-member GSDs. A critical examination of parametric curve fitting through a series of numerical experiments shows that the goodness-of-fit of an approximation may be a poor guide to its genetic significance. The genetic interpretation of GSDs is a poorly constrained problem that cannot be solved without taking into account the geological context of GSDs, which may be captured by the covariance structure of grain-size classes across a series of GSDs sampled in a contiguous area. Curve-fitting methods cannot exploit this geological context, which explains why the geological relevance of curve-fitting results obtained in black-box mode is questionable. The desired genetic interpretation of GSDs can be obtained by applying the end-member-modelling algorithm EMMA to a series of GSDs simultaneously. Many end-member GSDs estimated by EMMA do not conform to one of the popular theoretical GSD models. Consequently, parametric curve fitting with theoretical distributions is more likely to obscure than to reveal the existence of genetically significant grain-size populations in sediments, especially if such populations are present in small proportions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.007</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0738
ispartof Sedimentary geology, 2007-12, Vol.202 (3), p.409-424
issn 0037-0738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19533317
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Curve fitting
End-member modelling
Grain-size distribution
Mixing
Unmixing
title Genetically meaningful decomposition of grain-size distributions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetically%20meaningful%20decomposition%20of%20grain-size%20distributions&rft.jtitle=Sedimentary%20geology&rft.au=Weltje,%20Gert%20Jan&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=202&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=409-424&rft.issn=0037-0738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19533317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-358feb1f7c1d89e575d39c184a6a8c2c1f5710382fdc2a26f8daec36a308c12a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19533317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true