Loading…

Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers

Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poultry science 2017-11, Vol.96 (11), p.3944-3948
Main Authors: Peebles, E D, Barbosa, T M, Cummings, T S, Dickson, J, Womack, S K, Gerard, P D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3
container_end_page 3948
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3944
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 96
creator Peebles, E D
Barbosa, T M
Cummings, T S
Dickson, J
Womack, S K
Gerard, P D
description Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage.
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps/pex201
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954063112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1954063112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1u1TAQha0KRC-FBS9QeUdZhI7tOD_L6qoFpCIkBOvIscetaRKnHueKPhMvSaJbWI1m9J2jozmMvRPwUalGXs50OeNvCeKE7YSWulCiFi_YDkDJQtetOGWviX4BSFFV9St2KlvQUILesT_7OM4mmRwOyNF7tJl49DxMPB4iP2CihTgtvV2ymTCui3FjmALlTRSnDc73yL-ahA_vibtAaAj5wVgbJuRmcnxOWMyDsTjilPl9HFyY7ngOI_LVYFPPKVok2s5PAQe3uX6PRLyGhvcphmEN8oa99GYgfPs8z9jPm-sf-8_F7bdPX_ZXt4VVEnKhalGVlfI96NJqQADwStmyaStpsKkt2FLJsu570WJZIzbKeadBON2grbw6YxdH3zXV44KUuzGQxWE4PqATrS6hUkLIFf1wRG1a0yb03ZzCaNJTJ6Dbuulm6o7drOz5s-3Sj-j-k__KUH8BpY6NnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1954063112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Peebles, E D ; Barbosa, T M ; Cummings, T S ; Dickson, J ; Womack, S K ; Gerard, P D</creator><creatorcontrib>Peebles, E D ; Barbosa, T M ; Cummings, T S ; Dickson, J ; Womack, S K ; Gerard, P D</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29050405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Chickens ; Injections - methods ; Injections - veterinary ; Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary ; Male ; Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Ovum ; Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Vaccination - methods ; Vaccination - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2017-11, Vol.96 (11), p.3944-3948</ispartof><rights>2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29050405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peebles, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, T S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womack, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, P D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Injections - methods</subject><subject>Injections - veterinary</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ovum</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kc1u1TAQha0KRC-FBS9QeUdZhI7tOD_L6qoFpCIkBOvIscetaRKnHueKPhMvSaJbWI1m9J2jozmMvRPwUalGXs50OeNvCeKE7YSWulCiFi_YDkDJQtetOGWviX4BSFFV9St2KlvQUILesT_7OM4mmRwOyNF7tJl49DxMPB4iP2CihTgtvV2ymTCui3FjmALlTRSnDc73yL-ahA_vibtAaAj5wVgbJuRmcnxOWMyDsTjilPl9HFyY7ngOI_LVYFPPKVok2s5PAQe3uX6PRLyGhvcphmEN8oa99GYgfPs8z9jPm-sf-8_F7bdPX_ZXt4VVEnKhalGVlfI96NJqQADwStmyaStpsKkt2FLJsu570WJZIzbKeadBON2grbw6YxdH3zXV44KUuzGQxWE4PqATrS6hUkLIFf1wRG1a0yb03ZzCaNJTJ6Dbuulm6o7drOz5s-3Sj-j-k__KUH8BpY6NnA</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Peebles, E D</creator><creator>Barbosa, T M</creator><creator>Cummings, T S</creator><creator>Dickson, J</creator><creator>Womack, S K</creator><creator>Gerard, P D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers</title><author>Peebles, E D ; Barbosa, T M ; Cummings, T S ; Dickson, J ; Womack, S K ; Gerard, P D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Injections - methods</topic><topic>Injections - veterinary</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ovum</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peebles, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, T S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womack, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerard, P D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peebles, E D</au><au>Barbosa, T M</au><au>Cummings, T S</au><au>Dickson, J</au><au>Womack, S K</au><au>Gerard, P D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3944</spage><epage>3948</epage><pages>3944-3948</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29050405</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps/pex201</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2017-11, Vol.96 (11), p.3944-3948
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954063112
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Chickens
Injections - methods
Injections - veterinary
Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary
Male
Marek Disease - prevention & control
Marek Disease Vaccines - administration & dosage
Ovum
Poultry Diseases - prevention & control
Vaccination - methods
Vaccination - veterinary
title Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20effects%20of%20in%20ovo%20versus%20subcutaneous%20administration%20of%20the%20Marek's%20disease%20vaccine%20and%20pre-placement%20holding%20time%20on%20the%20processing%20yield%20of%20Ross%20708%20broilers&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Peebles,%20E%20D&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3944&rft.epage=3948&rft.pages=3944-3948&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps/pex201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1954063112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3716463fb054c50e000f33c48962ae87c0c43247bb19e47ee83dfd501d58ec6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1954063112&rft_id=info:pmid/29050405&rfr_iscdi=true